• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用心肺适能数据进行机器学习预测高血压:亨利福特锻炼测试(FIT)项目。

Using machine learning on cardiorespiratory fitness data for predicting hypertension: The Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) Project.

机构信息

King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudia Arabia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195344. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195344
PMID:29668729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5905952/
Abstract

This study evaluates and compares the performance of different machine learning techniques on predicting the individuals at risk of developing hypertension, and who are likely to benefit most from interventions, using the cardiorespiratory fitness data. The dataset of this study contains information of 23,095 patients who underwent clinician- referred exercise treadmill stress testing at Henry Ford Health Systems between 1991 and 2009 and had a complete 10-year follow-up. The variables of the dataset include information on vital signs, diagnosis and clinical laboratory measurements. Six machine learning techniques were investigated: LogitBoost (LB), Bayesian Network classifier (BN), Locally Weighted Naive Bayes (LWB), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Tree Forest (RTF). Using different validation methods, the RTF model has shown the best performance (AUC = 0.93) and outperformed all other machine learning techniques examined in this study. The results have also shown that it is critical to carefully explore and evaluate the performance of the machine learning models using various model evaluation methods as the prediction accuracy can significantly differ.

摘要

本研究评估和比较了不同机器学习技术在使用心肺适能数据预测发生高血压风险的个体和最有可能从干预中受益的个体方面的表现。本研究的数据集包含了 1991 年至 2009 年间在亨利福特健康系统接受临床医生推荐的跑步机压力测试的 23095 名患者的信息,并且有完整的 10 年随访。数据集的变量包括生命体征、诊断和临床实验室测量信息。研究考察了六种机器学习技术:LogitBoost(LB)、贝叶斯网络分类器(BN)、局部加权朴素贝叶斯(LWB)、人工神经网络(ANN)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机树森林(RTF)。使用不同的验证方法,RTF 模型表现出最佳性能(AUC=0.93),优于本研究中检查的所有其他机器学习技术。研究结果还表明,使用各种模型评估方法仔细探索和评估机器学习模型的性能至关重要,因为预测准确性可能会有很大差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/a4fc2fda811a/pone.0195344.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/75ca73d5c4ed/pone.0195344.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/353044ae2323/pone.0195344.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/c34894c8455e/pone.0195344.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/90bf4b174560/pone.0195344.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/c0c767a8f001/pone.0195344.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/16bf59097ad9/pone.0195344.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/a4fc2fda811a/pone.0195344.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/75ca73d5c4ed/pone.0195344.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/353044ae2323/pone.0195344.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/c34894c8455e/pone.0195344.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/90bf4b174560/pone.0195344.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/c0c767a8f001/pone.0195344.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/16bf59097ad9/pone.0195344.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f4/5905952/a4fc2fda811a/pone.0195344.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Using machine learning on cardiorespiratory fitness data for predicting hypertension: The Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) Project.利用心肺适能数据进行机器学习预测高血压:亨利福特锻炼测试(FIT)项目。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195344. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict all-cause mortality using fitness data: the Henry ford exercIse testing (FIT) project.使用健身数据比较机器学习技术预测全因死亡率:亨利福特锻炼测试(FIT)项目。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0566-6.
3
Predicting diabetes mellitus using SMOTE and ensemble machine learning approach: The Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) project.使用SMOTE和集成机器学习方法预测糖尿病:亨利·福特运动测试(FIT)项目。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0179805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179805. eCollection 2017.
4
On the interpretability of machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension.基于机器学习的高血压预测模型的可解释性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0874-0.
5
Using Machine Learning to Define the Association between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and All-Cause Mortality (from the Henry Ford Exercise Testing Project).利用机器学习确定心肺适能与全因死亡率之间的关联(来自亨利·福特运动测试项目)。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;120(11):2078-2084. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.08.029. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
6
Radiogenomics of lower-grade gliomas: machine learning-based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status.低级别胶质瘤的放射基因组学:基于机器学习的 MRI 纹理分析预测 1p/19q 缺失状态。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):877-886. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06492-2. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
7
Machine Learning Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease.机器学习混合模型预测慢性肾脏病。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023 Mar 14;2023:9266889. doi: 10.1155/2023/9266889. eCollection 2023.
8
Statistical characterization and classification of colon microarray gene expression data using multiple machine learning paradigms.使用多种机器学习范例对结肠微阵列基因表达数据进行统计特征描述和分类。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Jul;176:173-193. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
9
Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.机器学习算法在(放化疗)治疗结果预测中的应用:分类器的实证比较。
Med Phys. 2018 Jul;45(7):3449-3459. doi: 10.1002/mp.12967. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
10
Application of Artificial Intelligence for Preoperative Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Blood Biomarkers.基于血液生物标志物的人工智能在卵巢上皮性癌术前诊断和预后预测中的应用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 May 15;25(10):3006-3015. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3378. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis of variants of machine learning and time series models in predicting women's participation in the labor force.机器学习和时间序列模型变体在预测女性劳动力参与率方面的比较分析。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Nov 11;10:e2430. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2430. eCollection 2024.
2
Improving cardiovascular risk stratification through multivariate time-series analysis of cardiopulmonary exercise test data.通过心肺运动试验数据的多变量时间序列分析改善心血管风险分层。
iScience. 2024 Aug 22;27(9):110792. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110792. eCollection 2024 Sep 20.
3
Predicting new cases of hypertension in Swedish primary care with a machine learning tool.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict all-cause mortality using fitness data: the Henry ford exercIse testing (FIT) project.使用健身数据比较机器学习技术预测全因死亡率:亨利福特锻炼测试(FIT)项目。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0566-6.
2
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药学协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
3
使用机器学习工具预测瑞典初级保健中的高血压新病例。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jun 30;44:102806. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102806. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Digitalization of hypertension management: a paradigm shift.高血压管理的数字化:范式转变。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Nov;397(11):8477-8483. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03229-x. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
5
FIT calculator: a multi-risk prediction framework for medical outcomes using cardiorespiratory fitness data.FIT 计算器:一种基于心肺健康数据的医疗结果多风险预测框架。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 16;14(1):8745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59401-z.
6
Predicting hypertension control using machine learning.利用机器学习预测高血压控制情况。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 20;19(3):e0299932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299932. eCollection 2024.
7
Machine learning-based models to predict the conversion of normal blood pressure to hypertension within 5-year follow-up.基于机器学习的模型预测正常血压在 5 年内转为高血压。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0300201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300201. eCollection 2024.
8
Prognostic risk models for incident hypertension: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis.预测高血压事件的预后风险模型:PRISMA 系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0294148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294148. eCollection 2024.
9
Development of risk models of incident hypertension using machine learning on the HUNT study data.利用 HUNT 研究数据的机器学习开发偶发性高血压风险模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56170-7.
10
Choice of refractive surgery types for myopia assisted by machine learning based on doctors' surgical selection data.基于医生手术选择数据的机器学习辅助近视屈光手术类型选择。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02451-0.
Predicting diabetes mellitus using SMOTE and ensemble machine learning approach: The Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) project.使用SMOTE和集成机器学习方法预测糖尿病:亨利·福特运动测试(FIT)项目。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0179805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179805. eCollection 2017.
4
Hypertension-related Mortality in the United States, 2000-2013.2000 - 2013年美国高血压相关死亡率
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Mar(193):1-8.
5
Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the Henry Ford Exercise Testing (FIT) Project.心肺适能与心房颤动事件风险:来自亨利福特运动测试(FIT)项目的结果。
Circulation. 2015 May 26;131(21):1827-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014833. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
6
Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential.医疗保健中的大数据分析:前景与潜力。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014 Feb 7;2:3. doi: 10.1186/2047-2501-2-3. eCollection 2014.
7
Cardiorespiratory fitness and incident diabetes: the FIT (Henry Ford ExercIse Testing) project.心肺适能与糖尿病发病风险:FIT(亨利福特运动测试)研究。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jun;38(6):1075-81. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2714. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
Physical fitness and hypertension in a population at risk for cardiovascular disease: the Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) Project.心血管疾病高危人群的体能与高血压:亨利·福特运动测试(FIT)项目
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Dec;3(6):e001268. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001268.
9
Liberal versus restrictive blood transfusion strategy: 3-year survival and cause of death results from the FOCUS randomised controlled trial.宽松与严格输血策略:FOCUS随机对照试验的3年生存率及死亡原因结果
Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1183-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62286-8. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
10
Prognostic value of exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: the FIT (Henry Ford ExercIse Testing) project.运动能力对冠心病患者的预后价值:FIT(亨利·福特运动测试)项目
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Dec;89(12):1644-54. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Oct 14.