Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Muenster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, D-48149 Muenster, Germany.
Cells in Motion" Interfaculty Centre, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Cells. 2020 Apr 23;9(4):1054. doi: 10.3390/cells9041054.
Ligand-based selectivity in signal transduction (biased signaling) is an emerging field of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) research and might allow the development of drugs with targeted activation profiles. Human formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) is a GPCR that detects potentially hazardous states characterized by the appearance of N-formylated peptides that originate from either bacteria or mitochondria during tissue destruction; however, the receptor also responds to several non-formylated agonists from various sources. We hypothesized that an additional layer of FPR signaling is encoded by biased agonism, thus allowing the discrimination of the source of threat. We resorted to the comparative analysis of FPR1 agonist-evoked responses across three prototypical GPCR signaling pathways, i.e., the inhibition of cAMP formation, receptor internalization, and ERK activation, and analyzed cellular responses elicited by several bacteria- and mitochondria-derived ligands. We also included the anti-inflammatory annexinA1 peptide Ac2-26 and two synthetic ligands, the W-peptide and the small molecule FPRA14. Compared to the endogenous agonists, the bacterial agonists displayed significantly higher potencies and efficacies. Selective pathway activation was not observed, as both groups were similarly biased towards the inhibition of cAMP formation. The general agonist bias in FPR1 signaling suggests a source-independent pathway selectivity for transmission of pro-inflammatory danger signaling.
配体依赖性信号转导(偏向信号)是 G 蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)研究的一个新兴领域,可能允许开发具有靶向激活谱的药物。人源甲酰肽受体 1(FPR1)是一种 GPCR,可检测到潜在的危险状态,其特征是在组织破坏过程中出现来自细菌或线粒体的 N 甲酰化肽;然而,该受体还对来自各种来源的几种非甲酰化激动剂做出反应。我们假设,偏向激动剂编码了 FPR 信号传递的另一层,从而能够区分威胁的来源。我们采用了比较分析 FPR1 激动剂在三种典型的 GPCR 信号通路中引发的反应,即 cAMP 形成的抑制、受体内化和 ERK 激活,并分析了几种细菌和线粒体衍生配体引起的细胞反应。我们还包括抗炎 annexinA1 肽 Ac2-26 和两种合成配体,W-肽和小分子 FPRA14。与内源性激动剂相比,细菌激动剂显示出明显更高的效力和功效。未观察到选择性途径激活,因为两组在抑制 cAMP 形成方面具有相似的偏向性。FPR1 信号传递中普遍存在的激动剂偏向表明,对于促炎危险信号的传递,存在一种与来源无关的途径选择性。