Brown Janine L, Bansiddhi Pakkanut, Khonmee Jaruwan, Thitaram And Chatchote
Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA.
Center of Elephant and Wildlife Research, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 23;10(4):737. doi: 10.3390/ani10040737.
This review paper is a synthesis of results from multiple studies that we have conducted over the past several years using similar methodologies to identify factors related to welfare of captive populations of elephants in North American zoos and Thailand tourist camps. Using multiple conservation physiology tools, we found that, despite vastly disparate management systems, there are commonalities in how environmental and husbandry factors affect physical and physiological outcomes. Elephants appear to have better welfare, based on fecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGM) analyses, when housed under conditions that provide a more enriched, stimulating, and less restrictive environment. We also found it is essential to balance diet and exercise for good body condition and metabolic function. In Thailand, use of tools to control elephants, such as the ankus (i.e., guide, hook) and chains, did not equate to poor welfare per se, nor did riding; however, improper uses were associated with higher wound scores and FGM concentrations. Foot health was good overall in both regions, with cracks being the most common problem, and better foot scores were found in elephants kept on softer substrates. Based on these findings, science-based guidelines are being developed in Thailand, while in North America, changes are being incorporated into elephant standards and husbandry resource guides. Management across venues can be improved by encouraging elephant exploration and exercise, establishing socially compatibility groups, ensuring proper use of tools, and providing balanced diets. We contend there is no "one-size-fits-all" management strategy to guarantee good welfare for elephants, but there are essential needs that must be met regardless of where or how they are managed. Future studies are needed to find ways to better socialize elephants; determine how temperament affects coping styles and resilience; study the importance of good handler-elephant relationships; identify more ways for elephants to engage with the environment; and assess the effect of life history on subsequent physiological and psychological well-being.
这篇综述论文综合了我们在过去几年中使用类似方法进行的多项研究结果,这些研究旨在确定与北美动物园和泰国旅游营地中圈养大象种群福利相关的因素。通过使用多种保护生理学工具,我们发现,尽管管理系统差异巨大,但在环境和饲养因素如何影响身体和生理结果方面存在共性。根据粪便糖皮质激素代谢物(FGM)分析,大象在提供更丰富、刺激且限制较少的环境中饲养时,似乎福利状况更好。我们还发现,平衡饮食和运动对于良好的身体状况和代谢功能至关重要。在泰国,使用诸如象钩(即引导、钩子)和链条等工具控制大象本身并不等同于福利差,骑乘也是如此;然而,不当使用与更高的伤口评分和FGM浓度相关。两个地区的大象足部健康总体良好,裂缝是最常见的问题,在较软基质上饲养的大象足部评分更高。基于这些发现,泰国正在制定基于科学的指导方针,而在北美,相关变化正被纳入大象标准和饲养资源指南中。通过鼓励大象探索和运动、建立社会兼容群体、确保工具的正确使用以及提供均衡饮食,可以改善各场所的管理。我们认为,不存在保证大象良好福利的“一刀切”管理策略,但无论大象在哪里或以何种方式管理,都有一些基本需求必须得到满足。未来的研究需要找到更好的方法使大象社会化;确定气质如何影响应对方式和恢复力;研究良好的饲养员与大象关系的重要性;确定大象与环境互动的更多方式;并评估生活史对后续生理和心理健康的影响。