• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原材料采购策略的演变:来自以色列塔本洞深时序列的观点。

The evolution of raw material procurement strategies: A view from the deep sequence of Tabun Cave, Israel.

机构信息

Zinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel 3498838, Haifa, Israel.

School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2020 Jun;143:102787. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102787. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102787
PMID:32344263
Abstract

Changes in the ways Paleolithic foragers exploited raw material sources are linked to mobility, the demands of production, and investment in quarrying. Here, we analyze the use of raw materials in a long series of superimposed layers from Tabun Cave dating to the Middle Pleistocene, attributed to the Lower and Middle Paleolithic periods. Using the cortex preserved on the surfaces of artifacts, including blanks, tools and cores, we distinguished between flints obtained from primary and secondary geological contexts. The results from Tabun Cave indicate that the exploitation of secondary sources was fairly common during the earlier part of the Lower Paleolithic sequence. It decreased during the later part of the Acheulo-Yabrudian complex of the Lower Paleolithic, coinciding with growing use of predetermined technological strategies, which demand high-quality raw materials. By the Middle Paleolithic, primary and secondary raw materials are generally designated for different reduction trajectories, suggesting a growing distinction and formalization of technological strategies. The need for the 'best' stone for Middle Paleolithic laminar and Levallois production may have necessitated increased investment in raw material procurement. During most of the Lower Paleolithic, raw material needs could have been met easily through a purely embedded strategy, in which raw material was collected while focusing on other activities. Starting in the late Acheulo-Yabrudian and especially during the Middle Paleolithic, the focus on primary geological contexts may have demanded greater planning of visits to raw material outcrops. In other words, in the Middle Paleolithic and possibly already during the very end of the Lower Paleolithic, raw material procurement had greater influence on patterns of movement through the landscape.

摘要

旧石器时代的觅食者对原材料来源的利用方式的变化与流动性、生产需求以及对采石场的投资有关。在这里,我们分析了来自塔本洞穴的一系列叠加层的原材料利用情况,这些层的年代可追溯到中更新世,属于旧石器时代的下部和中期。我们利用保存在工具和核心等制品表面的外皮,区分了来自原生和次生地质环境的火石。塔本洞穴的结果表明,在旧石器时代下部序列的早期,对次生资源的利用相当普遍。在旧石器时代下部阿舍利-亚伯都利期复合体的后期,这种利用减少了,这与日益采用预定技术策略相吻合,这些策略需要高质量的原材料。到了中石器时代,原生和次生原材料通常用于不同的减少轨迹,这表明技术策略的区别和正式化程度不断提高。中石器时代层状和勒瓦娄哇技术对“最好”的石头的需求可能需要增加对原材料采购的投资。在大部分旧石器时代下部,通过纯粹的嵌入式策略很容易满足原材料需求,在这种策略中,在专注于其他活动的同时收集原材料。从阿舍利-亚伯都利期晚期开始,尤其是在中石器时代,对原生地质环境的关注可能需要更计划地访问原材料露头。换句话说,在中石器时代,可能已经在旧石器时代下部末期,原材料采购对景观中运动模式的影响更大。

相似文献

1
The evolution of raw material procurement strategies: A view from the deep sequence of Tabun Cave, Israel.原材料采购策略的演变:来自以色列塔本洞深时序列的观点。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jun;143:102787. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102787. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
2
Acheulo-Yabrudian and Early Middle Paleolithic at Hayonim Cave (Western Galilee, Israel): Continuity or break?阿舍利-雅布若文化期和中更新世早期在海诺姆洞(以色列加利利西部):连续还是断裂?
J Hum Evol. 2020 Feb;139:102733. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102733. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
3
A Middle Pleistocene abrading tool from Tabun Cave, Israel: A search for the roots of abrading technology in human evolution.以色列塔本洞穴的中更新世研磨工具:探寻人类进化中研磨技术的起源。
J Hum Evol. 2021 Jan;150:102909. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102909. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
The emergence of the Levallois technology in the Levant: A view from the Early Middle Paleolithic site of Misliya Cave, Israel.黎凡特地区勒瓦娄哇技术的出现:来自以色列米斯里亚洞早期中石器时代遗址的观点。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jul;144:102785. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102785. Epub 2020 May 16.
5
Systematic blade production at late Lower Paleolithic (400-200 kyr) Qesem Cave, Israel.系统刀生产在晚更新世(400-200 千年前)的以色列 Qesem 洞穴。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Oct;61(4):458-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
6
Dating the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Levant: a view from Misliya Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel.黎凡特下更新世至中更新世过渡时期的年代测定:来自以色列 Carmel 山 Misliya 洞的观察。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Nov;65(5):585-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
7
Interpreting the Quina and demi-Quina scrapers from Acheulo-Yabrudian Qesem Cave, Israel: Results of raw materials and functional analyses.解读来自以色列阿舍利-亚伯鲁德时期的 Qesem 洞穴中的奎那和准奎那刮刀:原材料和功能分析的结果。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jul;144:102798. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102798. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Predetermined flake production at the Lower/Middle Paleolithic boundary: Yabrudian scraper-blank technology.旧石器时代中晚期边界处的预定片状石器生产:亚布鲁迪安刮削器坯料技术。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 5;9(9):e106293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106293. eCollection 2014.
9
Recycling for a purpose in the late Lower Paleolithic Levant: Use-wear and residue analyses of small sharp flint items indicate a planned and integrated subsistence behavior at Qesem Cave (Israel).在旧石器时代晚期黎凡特的有目的回收利用:对小型燧石尖状器的使用痕迹和残留物分析表明,在 Qesem 洞穴(以色列)存在有计划和综合的生存行为。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Jun;131:109-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Hunter-gatherer mobility and embedded raw-material procurement strategies in the mediterranean upper paleolithic.地中海旧石器时代晚期狩猎采集者的流动性与嵌入式原材料获取策略
Evol Anthropol. 2016 May 6;25(3):164-74. doi: 10.1002/evan.21488.

引用本文的文献

1
The stone-to-metal transition reflected in the Iron Age copper production sites of Timna Valley, Israel.铁时代以色列蒂姆纳谷铜矿遗址中的石器到金属的转变。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 19;18(12):e0294569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294569. eCollection 2023.
2
Mechanical properties of lithic raw materials from Kazakhstan: Comparing chert, shale, and porphyry.哈萨克斯坦石器原料的机械性能:燧石、页岩和斑岩的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 22;17(4):e0265640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265640. eCollection 2022.