Laboratory of Prehistoric Research, The Zinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave., Mount Carmel, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.
The Use-Wear Analysis Laboratory, The Zinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave., Mount Carmel, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.
J Hum Evol. 2021 Jan;150:102909. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102909. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
During the reanalysis of the finds from Jelinek's and Ronen's excavations at Tabun Cave, Israel, we encountered a cobble bearing traces of mechanical alterations similar to those recorded on grinding tools. However, the artifact derives from the early layers of the Acheulo-Yabrudian complex of the late Lower Paleolithic (ca. 350 ka), a time with no evidence for grinding or abrasion. Accordingly, we sought to determine whether the traces on the artifact can be attributed to purposeful human action. We conducted a detailed use-wear analysis of the cobble and implemented an experimental program, gaining positive results for the hypothesis of purposeful human practice. We argue that the significance and novelty of early abrading technology is that it marks a new mode of raw material manipulation-one that is categorically different from other modes of tool use observed among earlier hominins or other primates and animals. Throughout the Early Pleistocene, use of stone tools was associated with vertical motions (battering, pounding, striking) or with the application of a thin or narrow working edge, leveled at cutting or scraping. Conversely, abrading consists in applying a wide working surface in a continuous sequence of horizontal motions, geared to modify or reduce the surfaces of a targeted material. The emergence of this technology joins additional behavioral changes recently identified and attributed to the Middle Pleistocene, illustrating the growing and diversifying capabilities of early hominins to harness technology to shape their environment.
在对杰利尼克(Jelinek)和罗南(Ronen)在以色列塔本洞(Tabun Cave)发掘的发现物进行重新分析时,我们遇到了一块带有机械改造痕迹的鹅卵石,这些痕迹与磨料工具上记录的相似。然而,这件人工制品来自晚期旧石器时代阿舍利-亚伯拉罕文化复合体的早期层(约 35 万年),当时没有研磨或磨损的证据。因此,我们试图确定该人工制品上的痕迹是否可以归因于有目的的人类行为。我们对鹅卵石进行了详细的使用痕迹分析,并实施了一个实验计划,该计划对有目的的人类实践的假设得出了积极的结果。我们认为,早期磨损技术的重要性和新颖性在于它标志着一种新的原材料处理模式——与其他早期人类或其他灵长类动物和动物所观察到的其他工具使用模式完全不同。在整个早更新世,石器的使用与垂直运动(击打、敲击、打击)或与薄或窄的工作边缘的应用有关,这些运动是为了切割或刮削。相反,磨损是指在连续的水平运动中应用宽的工作表面,以改变或减少目标材料的表面。这项技术的出现与最近被确定并归因于中更新世的其他行为变化一起,说明了早期人类利用技术塑造环境的能力不断增强和多样化。