Suppr超能文献

膳食总抗氧化能力预测全因死亡率的相对有效性与美国成年人饮食质量指数的比较。

Relative Validity of Dietary Total Antioxidant Capacity for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in Comparison to Diet Quality Indexes in US Adults.

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.

Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 04310, Korea.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Apr 25;12(5):1210. doi: 10.3390/nu12051210.

Abstract

While traditionally diet quality index scores (DQIS) as noted later in this abstract have been used to predict health outcomes, dietary total antioxidant capacity (TAC), a useful tool for assessing total antioxidant power in the diet, may also be a novel predictor. This study evaluated the associations between dietary TAC and DQIS and all-cause mortality. Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1988-1994 and 1999-2006, 23,797 US adults were followed-up until 2015. Dietary TAC and DQIS including the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010), alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED), and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) were calculated using a 1-day 24 h dietary recall. US adults in the highest quintiles of DQIS had lower rates of all-cause mortality compared to those in the lowest quintiles (HEI-2015 hazard ratio (HR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.98; AHEI-2010 HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94; aMED HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90; DASH HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.92). Similarly, those in the highest quintile of dietary TAC also had a lower all-cause mortality than those in the lowest quintile (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79-0.98). These findings suggest that dietary TAC might be a relatively valid predictor of all-cause mortality in the US population compared to the DQIS.

摘要

虽然传统上饮食质量指数评分(DQIS)如本摘要稍后所述,用于预测健康结果,但饮食总抗氧化能力(TAC),一种用于评估饮食中总抗氧化能力的有用工具,也可能是一种新的预测因子。本研究评估了饮食 TAC 与 DQIS 和全因死亡率之间的关联。基于 1988-1994 年和 1999-2006 年的全国健康和营养检查调查(NHANES),对 23797 名美国成年人进行了随访,直到 2015 年。使用 1 天 24 小时饮食回忆法计算饮食 TAC 和 DQIS,包括健康饮食指数-2015(HEI-2015)、替代健康饮食指数-2010(AHEI-2010)、替代地中海饮食(aMED)和停止高血压的饮食方法(DASH)。与最低五分位数相比,DQIS 最高五分位数的成年人全因死亡率较低(HEI-2015 风险比(HR):0.87,95%置信区间(CI):0.77-0.98;AHEI-2010 HR:0.84,95% CI:0.74-0.94;aMED HR:0.79,95% CI:0.69-0.90;DASH HR:0.80,95% CI:0.70-0.92)。同样,饮食 TAC 最高五分位数的成年人全因死亡率也低于最低五分位数(HR:0.88,95% CI:0.79-0.98)。这些发现表明,与 DQIS 相比,饮食 TAC 可能是美国人群全因死亡率的相对有效预测因子。

相似文献

9

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015.评价 2015 年健康饮食指数。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1622-1633. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.019.
9
Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases.氧化应激、衰老和疾病。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Apr 26;13:757-772. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S158513. eCollection 2018.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验