Suppr超能文献

在一项针对哮喘患者使用特布他林的研究中,一种新型多剂量干粉吸入器(都保)与压力定量吸入器的对比。

A new multiple dose powder inhaler, (Turbuhaler), compared with a pressurized inhaler in a study of terbutaline in asthmatics.

作者信息

Persson G, Gruvstad E, Ståhl E

机构信息

Clinic of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1988 Aug;1(8):681-4.

PMID:3234516
Abstract

Twelve adult asthmatic patients participated in an open, randomized, cross-over comparison between cumulatively increasing doses of terbutaline sulphate administered via the multiple dose powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) or via a pressurized inhaler. Turbuhaler and the pressurized inhaler showed equipotency both with respect to bronchodilatation and side effects. Both treatments produced a significant increase in pulmonary function measurements, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). No increase in pulse rate was seen with either treatment but there was an increase in tremor at higher doses with both treatments. Inhalation of beta-agonists via Turbuhaler seems to be an effective way of treating asthma.

摘要

12名成年哮喘患者参与了一项开放性、随机交叉比较试验,比较通过多剂量干粉吸入器(都保)或压力定量吸入器给予累积递增剂量硫酸特布他林的效果。都保和压力定量吸入器在支气管扩张和副作用方面显示出等效性。两种治疗方法均使肺功能测量指标、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和用力肺活量(FVC)显著增加。两种治疗方法均未使心率增加,但在较高剂量时,两种治疗方法均使震颤增加。通过都保吸入β受体激动剂似乎是治疗哮喘的一种有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验