• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Food and beverage marketing in schools: school superintendents' perspectives and practices after the healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.学校的食品和饮料营销:《健康无饥饿儿童法案》后学校负责人的观点和实践。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug;23(11):2024-2031. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004804. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
"On a Positive Path": School Superintendents' Perceptions of and Experiences With Local School Wellness Policy Implementation and Evaluation.“走上正轨”: 学校管理者对地方学校健康政策实施和评估的看法和经验。
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Nov;22(6):880-889. doi: 10.1177/1524839920907559. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
Wisconsin School Wellness Policies after Federal Legislation Change: Understanding Key Mechanisms of Policy Improvement.威斯康星州学校健康政策在联邦立法变革后的发展:理解政策改善的关键机制。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 May;121(5):872-882. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.082. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
"Bridging, brokering, and buffering": a theoretical exploration of school leaders' engagement with local school wellness policy implementation.“桥梁搭建、斡旋与缓冲”:对学校领导参与地方学校健康政策实施的理论探索
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 May 4;1:44. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00029-1. eCollection 2020.
5
School superintendents' perceptions of schools assisting students in obtaining public health insurance.学校管理者对学校协助学生获得公共健康保险的看法。
J Sch Health. 2011 Dec;81(12):756-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00655.x.
6
USDA Snack Policy Implementation: Best Practices From the Front Lines, United States, 2013-2014.美国农业部零食政策实施:2013 - 2014年美国前线最佳实践
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 16;13:E79. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160023.
7
Assessing the Relationship between District and State Policies and School Nutrition Promotion-Related Practices in the United States.评估美国地区和州政策与学校营养推广相关实践之间的关系。
Nutrients. 2020 Aug 7;12(8):2356. doi: 10.3390/nu12082356.
8
A School-Based Brand Marketing Program's Adherence to Federal Nutrition Criteria.基于学校的品牌营销计划对联邦营养标准的遵守情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Nov;53(5):710-713. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
9
District wellness policies and school-level practices in Minnesota, USA.美国明尼苏达州的地区健康政策及学校层面的实践
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jan;19(1):26-35. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001500. Epub 2015 May 20.
10
State-Level Guidance and District-Level Policies and Practices for Food Marketing in US School Districts.美国学区食品营销的州级指导意见和地区级政策与实践。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jun 7;15:E74. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170352.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of food and nonalcoholic beverage sponsorship and marketing in the school environment on the food choices of school-going children and adolescents: A scoping review, 2011-2023.2011 - 2023年学校环境中食品和非酒精饮料赞助及营销对在校儿童和青少年食物选择的影响:一项范围综述
Obes Rev. 2025 Aug;26(8):e13923. doi: 10.1111/obr.13923. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Identifying barriers and facilitators in the development and implementation of government-led food environment policies: a systematic review.识别政府主导的食品环境政策制定和实施中的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2022 Jul 7;80(8):1896-1918. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac016.

本文引用的文献

1
State-Level Guidance and District-Level Policies and Practices for Food Marketing in US School Districts.美国学区食品营销的州级指导意见和地区级政策与实践。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jun 7;15:E74. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170352.
2
High School Students' Recommendations to Improve School Food Environments: Insights From a Critical Stakeholder Group.高中生对改善学校饮食环境的建议:关键利益相关者群体的见解
J Sch Health. 2017 Nov;87(11):842-849. doi: 10.1111/josh.12562.
3
Insights on the Intersection of Health Equity and School Nutrition Policy Implementation: An Exploratory Qualitative Secondary Analysis.健康公平与学校营养政策实施交叉点的见解:探索性定性二次分析。
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Oct;44(5):685-695. doi: 10.1177/1090198117723961. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
4
Effects of Offering Look-Alike Products as Smart Snacks in Schools.在学校提供类似产品作为健康小零食的影响。
Child Obes. 2016 Dec;12(6):432-439. doi: 10.1089/chi.2016.0080. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
5
Local School Wellness Policy Implementation Under the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. Final rule.根据2010年《健康、无饥饿儿童法案》实施的地方学校健康政策。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Jul 29;81(146):50151-70.
6
National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program: Nutrition Standards for All Foods Sold in School as Required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. Final rule and interim final rule.国家学校午餐计划和学校早餐计划:2010年《健康、无饥饿儿童法案》要求的学校销售的所有食品的营养标准。最终规则和暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Jul 29;81(146):50131-51.
7
Television advertising, not viewing, is associated with negative dietary patterns in children.与儿童不良饮食模式相关的是电视广告,而非看电视本身。
Pediatr Obes. 2016 Apr;11(2):158-60. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12057. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
Commercialism in US elementary and secondary school nutrition environments: trends from 2007 to 2012.美国中小学营养环境中的商业化趋势:2007 年至 2012 年的趋势。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Mar;168(3):234-42. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4521.
9
Food and beverage marketing in schools: putting student health at the head of the class.学校中的食品饮料营销:将学生健康置于首位。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Mar;168(3):206-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5003.
10
Nutritional content of food and beverage products in television advertisements seen on children's programming.儿童节目中出现的电视广告里食品和饮料产品的营养成分。
Child Obes. 2013 Dec;9(6):524-31. doi: 10.1089/chi.2013.0072. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

学校的食品和饮料营销:《健康无饥饿儿童法案》后学校负责人的观点和实践。

Food and beverage marketing in schools: school superintendents' perspectives and practices after the healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.

机构信息

Institute for Health Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL60608, USA.

UConn Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT06103, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug;23(11):2024-2031. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004804. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980019004804
PMID:32345401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10200456/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Children are surrounded by ubiquitous forms of unhealthy food marketing at home and in schools. The US Department of Agriculture now restricts food and beverage marketing that does not meet Smart Snacks in School standards. School superintendents, as districts' top administrators, play a critical role in ensuring marketing policies are implemented and adhered to; however, there is limited research involving this stakeholder group. The current study examined superintendents' perspectives on food marketing in schools and the marketing provision in wellness policies, as well as experiences with the implementation of such policies.

DESIGN

Qualitative focus groups and follow-up interviews (with focus group participants) were conducted by trained researchers.

SETTING

Focus groups occurred at The School Superintendents' annual meeting; follow-up interviews were over the telephone.

PARTICIPANTS

Superintendents and assistant superintendents (n 39) from twenty-three states participated. Interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed; transcripts were team-coded in Atlas.ti using an iteratively revised coding guide to facilitate theme generation.

RESULTS

Despite common concerns that marketing to children was 'insidious', superintendents reported a wide range of food and beverage marketing policies. In addition, the main issue is fundraising - such as 'restaurant nights' - that results in marketing that occurs on- and off-campus and afterschool.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between perspectives and practices point to the challenges that superintendents face with budgetary constraints, as well as relationships with parent-teacher organisations. These findings provide important insights about superintendents' perspectives and challenges, particularly for government and child health advocates supporting school districts, to implement these policies.

摘要

目的

儿童在家庭和学校中处处都能接触到不健康的食品营销。美国农业部现在限制不符合“学校智能零食”标准的食品和饮料营销。作为学区的最高管理者,学校总监在确保实施和遵守营销政策方面发挥着关键作用;然而,涉及这一利益相关者群体的研究有限。本研究调查了总监们对学校食品营销的看法以及健康政策中的营销规定,以及实施这些政策的经验。

设计

由训练有素的研究人员进行了定性焦点小组和后续访谈(与焦点小组参与者)。

地点

焦点小组在学校总监年度会议上进行;后续访谈通过电话进行。

参与者

来自 23 个州的 39 名总监和助理总监参加了访谈。访谈进行了录音并由专业人员进行了转录;使用 Atlas.ti 对转录本进行了团队编码,使用迭代修订的编码指南来促进主题生成。

结果

尽管普遍担心向儿童营销是“阴险的”,但总监们报告了广泛的食品和饮料营销政策。此外,主要问题是筹款——例如“餐厅之夜”——导致校园内和校外以及课后的营销活动。

结论

观点和实践之间的差异表明,总监们面临着预算限制以及与家长教师组织的关系方面的挑战。这些发现为总监们的观点和挑战提供了重要的见解,特别是对于支持学区的政府和儿童健康倡导者,以实施这些政策。