• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

着床前心理社会评估与机械循环支持期间临床结局预测:哪些信息最具预后价值?

The Preimplantation Psychosocial Evaluation and Prediction of Clinical Outcomes During Mechanical Circulatory Support: What Information Is Most Prognostic?

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2021 Mar 1;105(3):608-619. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003287.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000003287
PMID:32345866
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial evaluations are required for long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) candidates, no matter whether MCS will be destination therapy (DT) or a bridge to heart transplantation. Although guidelines specify psychosocial contraindications to MCS, there is no comprehensive examination of which psychosocial evaluation domains are most prognostic for clinical outcomes. We evaluated whether overall psychosocial risk, determined across all psychosocial domains, predicted outcomes, and which specific domains appeared responsible for any effects.

METHODS

A single-site retrospective analysis was performed for adults receiving MCS between April 2004 and December 2017. Using an established rating system, we coded psychosocial evaluations to identify patients at low, moderate, or high overall risk. We similarly determined risk within each of 10 individual psychosocial domains. Multivariable analyses evaluated whether psychosocial risk predicted clinical decisions about MCS use (DT versus bridge), and postimplantation mortality, transplantation, rehospitalization, MCS pump exchange, and standardly defined adverse medical events (AEs).

RESULTS

In 241 MCS recipients, greater overall psychosocial risk increased the likelihood of a DT decision (odds ratio, 1.76; P = 0.017); and postimplantation pump exchange and occurrence of AEs (hazard ratios [HRs] ≥ 1.25; P ≤ 0.042). The individual AEs most strongly predicted were cardiac arrhythmias and device malfunctions (HRs ≥ 1.39; P ≤ 0.032). The specific psychosocial domains predicting at least 1 study outcome were mental health problem severity, poorer medical adherence, and substance use (odds ratios and HRs ≥ 1.32; P ≤ 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The psychosocial evaluation predicts not only clinical decisions about MCS use (DT versus bridge) but important postimplantation outcomes. Strategies to address psychosocial risk factors before or soon after implantation may help to reduce postimplantation clinical risks.

摘要

背景

无论是否将机械循环支持(MCS)作为终末期治疗(destination therapy,DT),都需要对长期接受 MCS 的患者进行心理社会评估。尽管指南规定了 MCS 的心理社会禁忌证,但目前尚未全面研究哪些心理社会评估领域对临床结局最具预测性。我们评估了整体心理社会风险是否可以预测结局,以及哪些特定的领域对结果有影响。

方法

对 2004 年 4 月至 2017 年 12 月期间在单中心接受 MCS 的成年人进行回顾性分析。使用已建立的评分系统对心理社会评估进行编码,以确定患者的整体风险低、中或高。我们还确定了 10 个单独心理社会领域内的风险。多变量分析评估了心理社会风险是否预测了 MCS 使用(DT 或桥接)的临床决策,以及植入后的死亡率、移植、再入院、MCS 泵更换和标准定义的不良医疗事件(AE)。

结果

在 241 例 MCS 患者中,较高的整体心理社会风险增加了 DT 决策的可能性(比值比,1.76;P=0.017);以及植入后泵更换和 AE 的发生(风险比[HR]≥1.25;P≤0.042)。预测至少 1 项研究结局的个体 AE 为心律失常和器械故障(HR≥1.39;P≤0.032)。预测至少 1 项研究结局的特定心理社会领域为心理健康问题严重程度、较差的医疗依从性和物质使用(比值比和 HR≥1.32;P≤0.010)。

结论

心理社会评估不仅可以预测 MCS 使用(DT 与桥接)的临床决策,还可以预测重要的植入后结局。在植入前或植入后不久采取策略来解决心理社会危险因素,可能有助于降低植入后的临床风险。

相似文献

1
The Preimplantation Psychosocial Evaluation and Prediction of Clinical Outcomes During Mechanical Circulatory Support: What Information Is Most Prognostic?着床前心理社会评估与机械循环支持期间临床结局预测:哪些信息最具预后价值?
Transplantation. 2021 Mar 1;105(3):608-619. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003287.
2
Utility of the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.持续血流左心室辅助装置植入患者中移植候选者心理社会评估的效用
Prog Transplant. 2018 Sep;28(3):220-225. doi: 10.1177/1526924818781559. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
The Approach to the Psychosocial Evaluation of Cardiac Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support Candidates.心脏移植和机械循环支持候选者的心理社会评估方法
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2019 Dec;16(6):201-211. doi: 10.1007/s11897-019-00443-0.
4
Medical and psychosocial predictors of mechanical circulatory support device implantation and competing outcomes in the Waiting for a New Heart Study.机械循环支持装置植入和候补心脏研究中竞争结果的医学和心理社会预测因素。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Jan;31(1):16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.07.018. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
5
Psychosocial factors and quality-of-life after heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support.心脏移植和机械循环支持后的心理社会因素和生活质量。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012 Oct;17(5):558-63. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283564f45.
6
The Impact of a High-risk Psychosocial Assessment on Outcomes After Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.高危心理社会评估对耐用性机械循环支持治疗后的结果的影响。
ASAIO J. 2021 Apr 1;67(4):436-442. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001229.
7
Bridging to a Long-Term Ventricular Assist Device With Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support.通过短期机械循环支持过渡到长期心室辅助装置
Artif Organs. 2018 Jun;42(6):589-596. doi: 10.1111/aor.13112. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: psychosocial and ethical implications.作为终末期治疗的心室辅助装置:心理社会及伦理意义
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):9-11. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-11-1-9.
9
Standardized Psychosocial Assessment Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.在植入左心室辅助装置之前进行标准化的心理社会评估。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Jan;12(1):e005377. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005377.
10
Mechanical Circulatory Support as Bridge to Transplantation for the Failing Single Ventricle.机械循环支持作为单心室衰竭患者移植的桥梁
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Risk and Recurrent Hospitalizations in Women and Men Following LVAD Implantation: A Multi-State Analysis of the INTERMACS Registry.左心室辅助装置植入术后男女患者的心理社会风险与再次住院情况:来自INTERMACS注册研究的多状态分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 22;12(6):198. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12060198.
2
Association between psychosocial factors and left ventricular assist device implant outcomes: A systematic review.心理社会因素与左心室辅助装置植入结局之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2024 Sep-Oct;90:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.007. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
3
Variation in Left Ventricular Assist Device Postdischarge Caregiver Requirements: Results From a Mixed-Methods Study With Equity Implications.
左心室辅助装置出院后照护者需求的变化:具有公平性影响的混合方法研究结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;15(8):e009583. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.009583. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
Sex Differences in Recovery and Device Replacement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy.作为心脏移植的终末期治疗,左心室辅助装置植入术后的恢复和设备更换存在性别差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e023294. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023294. Epub 2022 Feb 22.