• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对健康与幸福类智能手机应用的使用及参与度的影响:系统评价

Influences on the Uptake of and Engagement With Health and Well-Being Smartphone Apps: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Szinay Dorothy, Jones Andy, Chadborn Tim, Brown Jamie, Naughton Felix

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e17572. doi: 10.2196/17572.

DOI:10.2196/17572
PMID:32348255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7293059/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The public health impact of health and well-being digital interventions is dependent upon sufficient real-world uptake and engagement. Uptake is currently largely dependent on popularity indicators (eg, ranking and user ratings on app stores), which may not correspond with effectiveness, and rapid disengagement is common. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify factors that influence uptake and engagement with health and well-being apps to inform new approaches that promote the effective use of such tools.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to understand what is known about influences on the uptake of and engagement with health and well-being smartphone apps among adults.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. Studies conducted on adults were included if they focused on health and well-being smartphone apps reporting on uptake and engagement behavior. Studies identified through a systematic search in Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, or MEDLARS Online (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsychINFO, Scopus, Cochrane library databases, DataBase systems and Logic Programming (DBLP), and Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital library were screened, with a proportion screened independently by 2 authors. Data synthesis and interpretation were undertaken using a deductive iterative process. External validity checking was undertaken by an independent researcher. A narrative synthesis of the findings was structured around the components of the capability, opportunity, motivation, behavior change model and the theoretical domains framework (TDF).

RESULTS

Of the 7640 identified studies, 41 were included in the review. Factors related to uptake (U), engagement (E), or both (B) were identified. Under capability, the main factors identified were app literacy skills (B), app awareness (U), available user guidance (B), health information (E), statistical information on progress (E), well-designed reminders (E), features to reduce cognitive load (E), and self-monitoring features (E). Availability at low cost (U), positive tone, and personalization (E) were identified as physical opportunity factors, whereas recommendations for health and well-being apps (U), embedded health professional support (E), and social networking (E) possibilities were social opportunity factors. Finally, the motivation factors included positive feedback (E), available rewards (E), goal setting (E), and the perceived utility of the app (E).

CONCLUSIONS

Across a wide range of populations and behaviors, 26 factors relating to capability, opportunity, and motivation appear to influence the uptake of and engagement with health and well-being smartphone apps. Our recommendations may help app developers, health app portal developers, and policy makers in the optimization of health and well-being apps.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7da7/7293059/83f7c483a3a0/jmir_v22i5e17572_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7da7/7293059/83f7c483a3a0/jmir_v22i5e17572_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7da7/7293059/83f7c483a3a0/jmir_v22i5e17572_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

健康与幸福数字干预措施对公众健康的影响取决于在现实世界中的充分采用和参与度。目前,采用情况在很大程度上依赖于人气指标(例如应用商店中的排名和用户评分),而这些指标可能与有效性不相符,而且迅速不再参与的情况很常见。因此,迫切需要确定影响健康与幸福类应用程序采用和参与度的因素,以便为促进有效使用此类工具的新方法提供信息。

目的

本综述旨在了解关于成年人对健康与幸福类智能手机应用程序的采用和参与度的影响因素的已知情况。

方法

我们对定量、定性和混合方法研究进行了系统综述。纳入的针对成年人的研究需聚焦于报告采用和参与行为的健康与幸福类智能手机应用程序。通过在医学文献分析与检索系统在线平台(即MEDLARS在线平台,MEDLINE)、EMBASE、护理及相关健康文献累积索引数据库(CINAHL)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychINFO)、Scopus数据库、考克兰图书馆数据库、数据库系统与逻辑编程数据库(DBLP)以及美国计算机协会(ACM)数字图书馆中进行系统检索所识别出的研究进行筛选,由两位作者独立筛选一定比例的研究。采用演绎迭代过程进行数据综合与解读。由一名独立研究人员进行外部效度核查。研究结果的叙述性综合围绕能力、机会、动机、行为改变模型以及理论领域框架(TDF)的组成部分展开。

结果

在识别出的7640项研究中,41项被纳入本综述。确定了与采用(U)、参与度(E)或两者(B)相关的因素。在能力方面,确定的主要因素包括应用程序读写技能(B)、应用程序知晓度(U)、可用的用户指南(B)、健康信息(E)、进展的统计信息(E)、精心设计的提醒(E)、减少认知负荷的功能(E)以及自我监测功能(E)。低成本可用性(U)、积极的语气和个性化(E)被确定为物质机会因素,而健康与幸福类应用程序的推荐(U)、嵌入式健康专业支持(E)以及社交网络(E)可能性则是社会机会因素。最后,动机因素包括积极反馈(E)、可用奖励(E)、目标设定(E)以及应用程序的感知效用(E)。

结论

在广泛的人群和行为中,与能力、机会和动机相关的26个因素似乎会影响成年人对健康与幸福类智能手机应用程序的采用和参与度。我们的建议可能有助于应用程序开发者、健康应用程序门户开发者以及政策制定者优化健康与幸福类应用程序。

相似文献

1
Influences on the Uptake of and Engagement With Health and Well-Being Smartphone Apps: Systematic Review.对健康与幸福类智能手机应用的使用及参与度的影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e17572. doi: 10.2196/17572.
2
Perceptions of Factors Influencing Engagement With Health and Well-being Apps in the United Kingdom: Qualitative Interview Study.英国民众对影响健康与幸福类应用程序使用因素的认知:定性访谈研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 16;9(12):e29098. doi: 10.2196/29098.
3
Influences on the Uptake of Health and Well-being Apps and Curated App Portals: Think-Aloud and Interview Study.健康与福祉类应用和精选应用门户的使用影响因素:出声思维和访谈研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 27;9(4):e27173. doi: 10.2196/27173.
4
Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.智能手机应用程序能否增加身体活动?系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(3):e12053. doi: 10.2196/12053.
5
Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma.用于哮喘的智能手机和平板电脑自我管理应用程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD010013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010013.pub2.
6
The Reviews Are in: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Consumer Perspectives on Apps for Bipolar Disorder.评论如下:关于双相情感障碍应用程序消费者观点的定性内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 7;19(4):e105. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7273.
7
When and Why Adults Abandon Lifestyle Behavior and Mental Health Mobile Apps: Scoping Review.成年人何时以及为何放弃生活方式行为和心理健康移动应用程序:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 18;26:e56897. doi: 10.2196/56897.
8
The Acceptability, Engagement, and Feasibility of Mental Health Apps for Marginalized and Underserved Young People: Systematic Review and Qualitative Study.边缘化和服务不足的年轻人使用心理健康应用的可接受性、参与度和可行性:系统评价和定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 30;26:e48964. doi: 10.2196/48964.
9
Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Experiences of Using Publicly Available Physical Activity Mobile Apps: Qualitative Study.乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌幸存者使用公共可用的体育活动移动应用程序的体验:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 4;7(1):e10918. doi: 10.2196/10918.
10
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.影响移动医疗应用程序用于预防或管理非传染性疾病的依从性的因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobile App-Assisted Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes in Ningbo, China: 12-Month Retrospective Cohort Study.中国宁波2型糖尿病患者移动应用辅助血糖自我监测:12个月回顾性队列研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Sep 2;13:e65919. doi: 10.2196/65919.
2
Promoting trust and intention to adopt health information generated by ChatGPT among healthcare customers: An empirical study.促进医疗保健客户对ChatGPT生成的健康信息的信任和采用意愿:一项实证研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 28;11:20552076251374121. doi: 10.1177/20552076251374121. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
User Character Strengths and Engagement Prediction on a Digital Mental Health Platform for Young People: Longitudinal Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the addition of a supportive chatbot promote user engagement with a smoking cessation app? An experimental study.添加支持性聊天机器人是否能促进用户对戒烟应用程序的参与度?一项实验研究。
Digit Health. 2019 Sep 30;5:2055207619880676. doi: 10.1177/2055207619880676. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
2
Engagement features judged by excessive drinkers as most important to include in smartphone applications for alcohol reduction: A mixed-methods study.酗酒者认为对减少酒精摄入的智能手机应用程序最重要的参与功能:一项混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2018 Jul 16;4:2055207618785841. doi: 10.1177/2055207618785841. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
3
青少年数字心理健康平台上的用户性格优势与参与度预测:纵向观察研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 25;27:e73793. doi: 10.2196/73793.
4
Examining sleep health and its associations with technology use among older adults in Sweden: insights from a population-based study.瑞典老年人睡眠健康及其与技术使用的关联研究:基于人群研究的见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 22;25(1):2896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23894-8.
5
Mobile Health Adoption in High-Risk Pregnancies Using Cluster Analysis of Biopsychosocial Outcomes: Observational Longitudinal Cohort Study.利用生物心理社会结局的聚类分析在高危妊娠中采用移动健康:观察性纵向队列研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 21;12:e67680. doi: 10.2196/67680.
6
Factors Influencing Engagement in a Digital Substance Use Prevention Program: Qualitative Study Using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Model and Theoretical Domains Framework.影响参与数字药物使用预防项目的因素:运用能力、机会、动机模型及理论领域框架的定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 14;13:e64861. doi: 10.2196/64861.
7
Health Care Workers' Experience With a Psychological Self-Monitoring App During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study.医护人员在新冠疫情期间使用心理自我监测应用程序的体验:混合方法研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 7;13:e70412. doi: 10.2196/70412.
8
Integrating Patient Choice and Collaborative Care Managers to Implement eHealth Tools in Depression: Self-Report Pilot Study.整合患者选择与协作护理经理以在抑郁症中实施电子健康工具:自我报告试点研究。
J Particip Med. 2025 Jul 31;17:e55349. doi: 10.2196/55349.
9
Parental and Demographic Predictors of Engagement in an mHealth Intervention: Observational Study From the Let's Grow Trial.移动健康干预参与度的父母及人口统计学预测因素:来自“一起成长”试验的观察性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jul 15;13:e60478. doi: 10.2196/60478.
10
Developing and Integrating Digital Sources in an Accessible and Sustainable Online Platform for Adolescents and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Collaborative Design Approach.在一个面向青少年和青年癌症幸存者的无障碍且可持续的在线平台中开发和整合数字资源:协作设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 11;9:e60897. doi: 10.2196/60897.
A Mixed Methods Study to Explore the Effects of Program Design Elements and Participant Characteristics on Parents' Engagement With an mHealth Program to Promote Healthy Infant Feeding: The Growing Healthy Program.
一项混合方法研究,旨在探讨项目设计要素和参与者特征对父母参与一项促进健康婴儿喂养的移动健康项目(“健康成长项目”)的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 25;10:397. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00397. eCollection 2019.
4
Understanding the Use of Smartphone Apps for Health Information Among Pregnant Chinese Women: Mixed Methods Study.了解中国孕妇使用智能手机应用获取健康信息的情况:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 18;7(6):e12631. doi: 10.2196/12631.
5
The Comparative Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Interventions in Improving Health Outcomes: Meta-Analytic Review.手机干预在改善健康结果方面的比较效果:荟萃分析评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 3;7(4):e11244. doi: 10.2196/11244.
6
The Characteristics and Quality of Mobile Phone Apps Targeted at Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: A Window of Opportunity for Health Information Dissemination?中国面向男男性行为者的手机应用程序的特征和质量:健康信息传播的契机?
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 27;7(3):e12573. doi: 10.2196/12573.
7
Exploring Users' Experiences of the Uptake and Adoption of Physical Activity Apps: Longitudinal Qualitative Study.探索用户对体育活动应用程序的接受和采用的体验:纵向定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 8;7(2):e11636. doi: 10.2196/11636.
8
Mobile Health Interventions for Self-Control of Unhealthy Alcohol Use: Systematic Review.移动健康干预措施对控制不健康饮酒的作用:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 29;7(1):e10899. doi: 10.2196/10899.
9
Developing Typologies of User Engagement With the BRANCH Alcohol-Harm Reduction Smartphone App: Qualitative Study.构建BRANCH酒精危害减少智能手机应用程序用户参与类型:定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 13;6(12):e11692. doi: 10.2196/11692.
10
To Prompt or Not to Prompt? A Microrandomized Trial of Time-Varying Push Notifications to Increase Proximal Engagement With a Mobile Health App.推送还是不推送?一项关于随时间变化的推送通知以增加与移动健康应用近端互动的微随机试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 29;6(11):e10123. doi: 10.2196/10123.