Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
The Beijer Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0232187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232187. eCollection 2020.
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) can come in different forms, presenting problems for diagnostic classification. Here, we examined personality traits in a large sample of patients (N = 265) diagnosed with SAD in comparison to healthy controls (N = 164) by use of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and Karolinska Scales of Personality (KSP). In addition, we identified subtypes of SAD based on cluster analysis of the NEO-PI-R Big Five personality dimensions. Significant group differences in personality traits between patients and controls were noted on all Big Five dimensions except agreeableness. Group differences were further noted on most lower-order facets of NEO-PI-R, and nearly all KSP variables. A logistic regression analysis showed, however, that only neuroticism and extraversion remained significant independent predictors of patient/control group when controlling for the effects of the other Big Five dimensions. Also, only neuroticism and extraversion yielded large effect sizes when SAD patients were compared to Swedish normative data for the NEO-PI-R. A two-step cluster analysis resulted in three separate clusters labelled Prototypical (33%), Introvert-Conscientious (29%), and Instable-Open (38%) SAD. Individuals in the Prototypical cluster deviated most on the Big Five dimensions and they were at the most severe end in profile analyses of social anxiety, self-rated fear during public speaking, trait anxiety, and anxiety-related KSP variables. While additional studies are needed to determine if personality subtypes in SAD differ in etiological and treatment-related factors, the present results demonstrate considerable personality heterogeneity in socially anxious individuals, further underscoring that SAD is a multidimensional disorder.
社交焦虑障碍(SAD)可能表现出不同的形式,这给诊断分类带来了问题。在这里,我们使用修订版 NEO 人格量表(NEO-PI-R)和卡罗林斯卡人格量表(KSP),在 265 名被诊断为 SAD 的患者和 164 名健康对照者的大样本中检查了人格特质。此外,我们还根据 NEO-PI-R 大五人格维度的聚类分析,确定了 SAD 的亚型。在患者和对照组之间,除了宜人性外,在所有大五维度上的人格特质都存在显著的组间差异。在 NEO-PI-R 的大多数低阶特质和几乎所有 KSP 变量上,也都存在组间差异。然而,逻辑回归分析表明,当控制其他大五维度的影响时,只有神经质和外向性仍然是患者/对照组的独立显著预测因素。此外,只有神经质和外向性在将 SAD 患者与 NEO-PI-R 的瑞典常模数据进行比较时,才产生了较大的效应量。两步聚类分析产生了三个独立的聚类,分别命名为原型(33%)、内向-尽责(29%)和不稳定-开放(38%)的 SAD。在大五维度上,原型聚类的个体偏差最大,在社交焦虑、公开演讲时的自我恐惧、特质焦虑和焦虑相关的 KSP 变量的特征分析中,他们处于最严重的一端。虽然需要进一步的研究来确定 SAD 中的人格亚型在病因和治疗相关因素上是否存在差异,但目前的结果表明,社交焦虑个体存在相当大的人格异质性,进一步强调了 SAD 是一种多维障碍。