Department of Palliative Medicine, Munich University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Statistical Consulting Unit (StaBLab), Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;34(6):806-816. doi: 10.1177/0269216320911595. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
Informal caregivers of palliative patients show higher levels of depression and distress compared with the general population. Fegg's (2013) existential behavioural therapy was shortened to two individual 1-h sessions (short-term existential behavioural therapy).
Testing the effectiveness of sEBT on psychological symptoms of informal caregivers in comparison with active control.
Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Informal caregivers of palliative in-patients.
The primary outcome was depression; secondary outcomes were anxiety, subjective distress and minor mental disorders, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, quality of life and direct health care costs. General linear mixed models allow several measurements per participant and change over time. Reasons for declining the intervention were investigated by Rosenstock's Health Belief Model.
Overall inclusion rate was 41.0%. Data of 157 caregivers were available (63.1% females; mean age: 54.6 years, standard deviation (SD): 14.1); 127 participants were included in the main analysis. Participation in sEBT or active control was not significantly associated with post-treatment depression. Outcomes showed prevailingly significant association with time of investigation. Self-efficacy, scepticism of benefit of the intervention, belief of better coping alone and support by family and friends were significant factors in declining participation in the randomised controlled trial.
Inclusion rate was tripled compared with a previously evaluated longer EBT group intervention. By shortening the intervention, inclusion rate was traded for effectiveness and the intervention could not impact caregivers' psychological state. Early integration of sEBT and combination of individual and group setting and further study of the optimal length for caregiver interventions are suggested.
与普通人群相比,姑息治疗患者的非正式照护者表现出更高水平的抑郁和困扰。Fegg(2013 年)的存在行为疗法被缩短为两个单独的 1 小时疗程(短期存在行为疗法)。
与主动对照相比,测试 sEBT 对非正式照护者心理症状的有效性。
随机对照试验。
设置/参与者:姑息治疗住院患者的非正式照护者。
主要结局是抑郁;次要结局是焦虑、主观困扰和轻度精神障碍、积极和消极情绪、生活满意度、生活质量和直接医疗保健费用。一般线性混合模型允许每个参与者进行多次测量,并随时间变化。拒绝干预的原因通过罗森斯托克健康信念模型进行调查。
总体纳入率为 41.0%。共有 157 名照护者的数据可用(63.1%为女性;平均年龄:54.6 岁,标准差(SD):14.1);127 名参与者纳入主要分析。sEBT 或主动对照的参与与治疗后抑郁无显著相关性。结果与调查时间普遍显著相关。自我效能、对干预益处的怀疑、单独应对能力更好的信念以及来自家庭和朋友的支持是拒绝参与随机对照试验的重要因素。
与以前评估的更长时间的 EBT 组干预相比,纳入率增加了两倍。通过缩短干预,纳入率换来了有效性,干预无法影响照护者的心理状态。建议早期整合 sEBT,并将个体和团体设置相结合,并进一步研究最佳的照护者干预长度。