University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing.
Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2583.
IMPORTANCE: Family caregivers of persons with advanced heart failure perform numerous daily tasks to assist their relatives and are at high risk for distress and poor quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a nurse-led palliative care telehealth intervention (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends Comprehensive Heart Failure for Patients and Caregivers [ENABLE CHF-PC]) on quality of life and mood of family caregivers of persons with New York Heart Association Class III/IV heart failure over 16 weeks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled caregivers aged 18 years and older who self-identified as an unpaid close friend or family member who knew the patient well and who was involved with their day-to-day medical care. Participants were recruited from outpatient heart failure clinics at a large academic tertiary care medical center and a Veterans Affairs medical center from August 2016 to October 2018. INTERVENTION: Four weekly psychosocial and problem-solving support telephonic sessions lasting between 20 and 60 minutes facilitated by a trained nurse coach plus monthly follow-up for 48 weeks. The usual care group received no additional intervention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were quality of life (measured using the Bakas Caregiver Outcomes Scale), mood (anxiety and/or depressive symptoms measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and burden (measured using the Montgomery-Borgatta Caregiver Burden scales) over 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes were global health (measured using the PROMIS Global Health instrument) and positive aspects of caregiving. RESULTS: A total of 158 family caregivers were randomized, 82 to the intervention and 76 to usual care. The mean (SD) age was 57.9 (11.6) years, 135 (85.4%) were female, 82 (51.9%) were African American, and 103 (65.2%) were the patient's spouse or partner. At week 16, the mean (SE) Bakas Caregiver Outcomes Scale score was 66.9 (2.1) in the intervention group and 63.9 (1.7) in the usual care group; over 16 weeks, the mean (SE) Bakas Caregiver Outcomes Scale score improved 0.7 (1.7) points in the intervention group and 1.1 (1.6) points in the usual care group (difference, -0.4; 95% CI, -5.1 to 4.3; Cohen d = -0.03). At week 16, no relevant between-group differences were observed between the intervention and usual care groups for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety measure (mean [SE] improvement from baseline, 0.3 [0.3] vs 0.4 [0.3]; difference, -0.1 [0.5]; d = -0.02) or depression measure (mean [SE] improvement from baseline, -0.2 [0.4] vs -0.3 [0.3]; difference, 0.1 [0.5]; d = 0.03). No between-group differences were observed in the Montgomery-Borgatta Caregiver Burden scales (d range, -0.18 to 0.0). Differences in secondary outcomes were also not significant (d range, -0.22 to 0.0). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This 2-site randomized clinical trial of a telehealth intervention for family caregivers of patients with advanced heart failure, more than half of whom were African American and most of whom were not distressed at baseline, did not demonstrate clinically better quality of life, mood, or burden compared with usual care over 16 weeks. Future interventions should target distressed caregivers and assess caregiver effects on patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505425.
重要性:患有晚期心力衰竭的患者的家庭护理人员执行许多日常任务来帮助他们的亲属,并且他们处于困扰和生活质量差的高风险之中。
目的:确定护士主导的姑息治疗远程医疗干预(Educate,Nurture,Advise,Before Life Ends Comprehensive Heart Failure for Patients and Caregivers [ENABLE CHF-PC])对纽约心脏协会 III/IV 级心力衰竭患者的家庭护理人员的生活质量和情绪的影响,为期 16 周。
设计、地点和参与者:这项单盲随机临床试验招募了年龄在 18 岁及以上的护理人员,他们自认为是不领薪的亲密朋友或家庭成员,他们了解患者并参与他们的日常医疗护理。参与者是从一家大型学术三级护理医疗中心和退伍军人事务医疗中心的门诊心力衰竭诊所招募的,招募时间为 2016 年 8 月至 2018 年 10 月。
干预措施:每周进行四次 20 至 60 分钟的心理社会和解决问题的支持电话会议,由一名经过培训的护士教练进行,外加每月 48 周的后续电话会议。常规护理组不接受其他干预措施。
主要结果和措施:主要结果是 16 周内的生活质量(使用 Bakas 护理人员结果量表衡量)、情绪(使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表衡量的焦虑和/或抑郁症状)和负担(使用蒙哥马利-博加塔护理人员负担量表衡量)。次要结果是全球健康(使用 PROMIS 全球健康工具衡量)和护理的积极方面。
结果:共有 158 名家庭护理人员被随机分配,82 名接受干预,76 名接受常规护理。平均(SD)年龄为 57.9(11.6)岁,135 名(85.4%)为女性,82 名(51.9%)为非裔美国人,103 名(65.2%)为患者的配偶或伴侣。在第 16 周时,干预组的 Bakas 护理人员结果量表平均(SE)得分为 66.9(2.1),常规护理组为 63.9(1.7);在 16 周期间,干预组的 Bakas 护理人员结果量表平均(SE)得分提高了 0.7(1.7)点,常规护理组提高了 1.1(1.6)点(差异,-0.4;95%CI,-5.1 至 4.3;Cohen d = -0.03)。在第 16 周时,干预组和常规护理组之间在医院焦虑和抑郁量表焦虑测量(从基线的平均(SE)改善,0.3[0.3] 与 0.4[0.3];差异,-0.1[0.5];d = -0.02)或抑郁测量(从基线的平均(SE)改善,-0.2[0.4] 与-0.3[0.3];差异,0.1[0.5];d = 0.03)方面没有观察到相关的组间差异。在蒙哥马利-博加塔护理人员负担量表(d 范围,-0.18 至 0.0)方面也没有观察到组间差异。次要结果也没有显著差异(d 范围,-0.22 至 0.0)。
结论和相关性:这项针对晚期心力衰竭患者的家庭护理人员的 2 个地点随机临床试验,其中一半以上为非裔美国人,大多数在基线时没有感到困扰,与常规护理相比,在 16 周内没有显示出更好的生活质量、情绪或负担。未来的干预措施应针对困扰的护理人员,并评估护理人员对患者结局的影响。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02505425。
Cancers (Basel). 2025-8-7
J Med Internet Res. 2025-5-5
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2025-4-8
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017-7-18
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017-12