St. Joseph's Heart Rhythm Center, Rzeszów, Poland.
Division of Clinical Electrophysiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.029. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) arising from the inaccessible basal region of the left ventricular summit (LVS) is challenging due to proximity to coronary vessels, epicardial fat, and poor radiofrequency (RF) delivery within the distal coronary venous system.
The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of an anatomic approach to inaccessible LVS-VAs using bipolar radiofrequency (Bi-RFCA) delivered from the anatomically adjacent left pulmonic cusp (LPC) to the opposite left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT).
Patients from 3 centers who had undergone Bi-RFCA for inaccessible LVS-VAs refractory to conventional RFCA using an anatomic approach targeting the adjacent LPC (reversed U approach) with catheter tip pointing inferiorly within the LPC and LVOT were reviewed.
Seven patients (age 59 ± 12 years; 3 women) underwent Bi-RF from the LPC to the LVOT for LVS-VAs after ≥1 failed conventional RFCA. Bi-RFCA (power 36 ± 7 W; duration 333 ± 107 seconds) resulted in VA suppression in 5 of 7 patients. In 2 cases, Bi-RFCA was successfully performed using dextrose 5% in water. No complications occurred. After mean follow-up of 14 ± 6 months, no recurrent VT was documented in 2 of 2 patients with baseline VT. Mean 84% reduction in premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden (31% ± 13% vs 4% ± 5% PVCs per day; P = .0027) was documented in the other patients.
In patients with LVS-VAs arising from the inaccessible region and refractory to conventional RFCA, an anatomic approach using Bi-RFCA from the LPC and opposite LVOT is an effective alternative approach.
由于靠近冠状动脉、心外膜脂肪和远端冠状静脉系统内的射频(RF)传递不良,因此经导管消融(RFCA)治疗起源于左心室顶(LVS)难以触及的基底区域的室性心律失常(VA)具有挑战性。
本研究旨在描述一种解剖方法在无法触及的 LVS-VA 中的应用,该方法使用从解剖上相邻的左肺动脉瓣(LPC)到相反的左心室流出道(LVOT)传递的双极射频(Bi-RFCA)。
回顾了 3 个中心的患者,他们接受了 Bi-RFCA 治疗,这些患者因无法触及的 LVS-VA 而无法接受常规 RFCA 治疗,采用靶向相邻 LPC(反向 U 方法)的解剖方法,导管尖端指向 LPC 和 LVOT 下方。
7 名患者(年龄 59 ± 12 岁;3 名女性)在至少 1 次常规 RFCA 失败后,经 LPC 至 LVOT 进行 Bi-RFCA 治疗 LVS-VA。Bi-RFCA(功率 36 ± 7 W;持续时间 333 ± 107 秒)使 7 名患者中的 5 名患者的 VA 得到抑制。在 2 例中,成功使用 5%葡萄糖水进行了 Bi-RFCA。未发生并发症。平均随访 14 ± 6 个月后,2 例基线 VT 的患者均未记录到复发性 VT。其他患者记录到过早收缩(PVC)负荷平均减少 84%(31%±13%的 PVC 与每天 4%±5%的 PVC;P=0.0027)。
对于起源于难以触及区域且对常规 RFCA 难治的 LVS-VA 患者,使用 LPC 和相反的 LVOT 的 Bi-RFCA 的解剖方法是一种有效的替代方法。