• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同衰弱评估工具对功能障碍、认知衰退和死亡率预测能力的差异:一项纵向队列研究。

Differences in the predictive capability for functional impairment, cognitive decline and mortality of different frailty tools: A longitudinal cohort study.

作者信息

Contreras-Escámez Beatriz, Izquierdo Mikel, Galbete Jiménez Arkaitz, Gutiérrez-Valencia Marta, Cedeno-Veloz Bernardo A, Martínez-Velilla Nicolás

机构信息

Servicio de Geriatría, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España; Navarrabiomed-Departamento de Salud-Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, España.

Universidad Pública de Navarra, IDISNA, Pamplona, Navarra, España; CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 2020 Jul 10;155(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.01.028. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.medcli.2020.01.028
PMID:32349871
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There are multiple frailty detection tools, but they have not been specifically developed for the institutionalised population. The aim of this study is to ascertain at 3-year follow-up which tool predicts functional impairment and mortality most precisely.

METHODS

Longitudinal cohort study with 110 patients in Pamplona (Navarra)>65 years. Four frailty tools were applied (Fried Criteria, Rockwood Frailty Scale, FRAIL-NH and Imputed Fried Frailty Criteria). The power of the association between the scales and the results was assessed by linear regression and Cox's analyses.

RESULTS

46.5% of the sample died during time to follow-up, 68% of whom died in their nursing home, with 43-month mean survival. Of the studied population, 71.3% showed disability at 3 years, especially the frail subjects. The robust patients had longer hospitalizations (m=3.4 days) than the frail. Imputed Fried and FRAIL-NH found statistically significant differences between groups for the variables studied. Imputed Fried Frailty Criteria showed a significant HR of death for the frail subjects (HR=3.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The Imputed Fried and FRAIL-NH tools showed a higher predictive capability for functional and cognitive decline, but only the Imputed Fried Frailty Criteria found a significant relationship between frailty and mortality.

摘要

背景与目的

有多种衰弱检测工具,但它们并非专门为机构化人群开发。本研究的目的是在3年随访期确定哪种工具能最准确地预测功能损害和死亡率。

方法

对潘普洛纳(纳瓦拉)110名65岁以上患者进行纵向队列研究。应用了四种衰弱工具(弗里德标准、罗克伍德衰弱量表、FRAIL-NH和推算弗里德衰弱标准)。通过线性回归和考克斯分析评估量表与结果之间关联的强度。

结果

随访期间46.5%的样本死亡,其中68%在养老院死亡,平均生存43个月。在研究人群中,71.3%在3年时出现残疾,尤其是衰弱受试者。健康的患者住院时间(中位数=3.4天)比衰弱患者长。推算弗里德标准和FRAIL-NH在所研究变量的组间发现了统计学显著差异。推算弗里德衰弱标准显示衰弱受试者的死亡风险比显著(风险比=3.3)。

结论

推算弗里德标准和FRAIL-NH工具对功能和认知衰退显示出更高的预测能力,但只有推算弗里德衰弱标准发现衰弱与死亡率之间存在显著关系。

相似文献

1
Differences in the predictive capability for functional impairment, cognitive decline and mortality of different frailty tools: A longitudinal cohort study.不同衰弱评估工具对功能障碍、认知衰退和死亡率预测能力的差异:一项纵向队列研究。
Med Clin (Barc). 2020 Jul 10;155(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.01.028. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Heterogeneity of Different Tools for Detecting the Prevalence of Frailty in Nursing Homes: Feasibility and Meaning of Different Approaches.不同工具检测养老院衰弱患病率的异质性:不同方法的可行性和意义。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):898.e1-898.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
FRAILTOOLS study protocol: a comprehensive validation of frailty assessment tools to screen and diagnose frailty in different clinical and social settings and to provide instruments for integrated care in older adults.FRAILTOOLS 研究方案:全面验证虚弱评估工具,以在不同临床和社会环境中筛查和诊断虚弱,并为老年人的综合护理提供工具。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1042-1.
4
Predictive validity of two frailty tools for mortality in Chinese nursing home residents: frailty index based on common laboratory tests (FI-Lab) versus FRAIL-NH.两种衰弱工具对中国养老院居民死亡率预测的有效性:基于常见实验室检查的衰弱指数(FI-Lab)与 FRAIL-NH 的比较。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018 Dec;30(12):1445-1452. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1041-7. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
5
Predictive performance of four frailty screening tools in community-dwelling elderly.四种衰弱筛查工具在社区居住老年人中的预测性能。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 10;17(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0633-y.
6
Trajectories of physical frailty and cognitive impairment in older adults in United States nursing homes.美国养老院老年人身体虚弱和认知障碍的轨迹
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03012-8.
7
Frailty and cognitive status evaluation can better predict mortality in older adults?衰弱和认知状态评估是否能更好地预测老年人的死亡率?
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jul-Aug;77:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
8
Frailty, Cognitive Impairment, and Incident Major Neurocognitive Disorders: Results of the NuAge Cohort Study.衰弱、认知障碍与新发重大神经认知障碍:NuAge 队列研究结果。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;94(3):1079-1092. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230006.
9
Predicting Adverse Health Outcomes in Nursing Homes: A 9-Year Longitudinal Study and Development of the FRAIL-Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quick Screening Tool.预测养老院中的不良健康结局:一项为期9年的纵向研究及FRAIL-最小数据集(MDS)快速筛查工具的开发
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Dec;16(12):1042-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
10
Cognitive function in Prefrail and frail community-dwelling older adults in China.中国社区居住的衰弱前期和衰弱老年人的认知功能。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 27;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1056-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Exercise Intervention Characteristics and Outcomes in Frail and Pre-Frail Older Adults.身体锻炼干预对体弱及体弱前期老年人的特征及效果
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Dec 16;9(6):163. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9060163.
2
The FRAIL-NH Scale: Systematic Review of the Use, Validity and Adaptations for Frailty Screening in Nursing Homes.虚弱- NH 量表:系统评价在疗养院进行虚弱筛查的使用、有效性和适应性。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(10):1205-1216. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1694-3.