Suppr超能文献

虚弱- NH 量表:系统评价在疗养院进行虚弱筛查的使用、有效性和适应性。

The FRAIL-NH Scale: Systematic Review of the Use, Validity and Adaptations for Frailty Screening in Nursing Homes.

机构信息

Shin J. Liau, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 407 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. E-mail:

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(10):1205-1216. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1694-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate frailty prevalence, cross-sectional associations, predictive validity, concurrent validity, and cross-cultural adaptations of the FRAIL-NH scale.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Frail residents living in nursing homes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2015 to June 2021 for primary studies that used the FRAIL-NH scale, irrespective of study designs and publication language.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 studies conducted across 20 countries utilized the FRAIL-NH scale; majority in Australia (n=14), followed by China (n=6), United States (n=3), and Spain (n=3). The scale has been translated and back-translated into Brazilian Portuguese, Chinese, and Japanese. Various cut-offs have been used, with ≥2 and ≥6 being the most common cut-offs for frail and most frail, respectively. When defined using these cut-offs, frailty prevalence varied from 15.1-79.5% (frail) to 28.5-75.0% (most frail). FRAIL-NH predicted falls (n=2), hospitalization or length of stay (n=4), functional or cognitive decline (n=4), and mortality (n=9) over a median follow-up of 12 months. FRAIL-NH has been compared to 16 other scales, and was correlated with Fried's phenotype (FP), Frailty Index (FI), and FI-Lab. Four studies reported fair-to-moderate agreements between FRAIL-NH and FI, FP, and the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Ten studies assessed the sensitivity and specificity of different FRAIL-NH cut-offs, with ≥8 having the highest sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (82.8%) for classifying residents as frail based on FI, while two studies reported an optimal cut-off of ≥2 based on FI and FP, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In seven years, the FRAIL-NH scale has been applied in 20 countries and adapted into three languages. Despite being applied with a range of cut-offs, FRAIL-NH was associated with higher care needs and demonstrated good agreement with other well-established but more complex scales. FRAIL-NH was predictive of adverse outcomes across different settings, highlighting its value in guiding care for frail residents in nursing homes.

摘要

目的

调查衰弱的流行程度、横断面关联、预测效度、同时效度和 FRAIL-NH 量表的跨文化适应性。

设计

系统评价。

设置和参与者

居住在养老院的衰弱居民。

方法

2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月,我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆中的原始研究,这些研究使用了 FRAIL-NH 量表,无论研究设计和出版语言如何。

结果

共有 40 项研究在 20 个国家进行,使用了 FRAIL-NH 量表;其中大多数来自澳大利亚(n=14),其次是中国(n=6)、美国(n=3)和西班牙(n=3)。该量表已被翻译成巴西葡萄牙语、中文和日语,并进行了回译。已经使用了各种截断值,其中≥2 和≥6 分别是衰弱和最衰弱的最常见截断值。当使用这些截断值定义时,衰弱的流行率从 15.1-79.5%(衰弱)到 28.5-75.0%(最衰弱)不等。FRAIL-NH 预测了跌倒(n=2)、住院或住院时间(n=4)、功能或认知下降(n=4)以及 12 个月中位随访期间的死亡率(n=9)。FRAIL-NH 已与 16 种其他量表进行了比较,并与 Fried 表型(FP)、衰弱指数(FI)和 FI-Lab 相关。四项研究报告了 FRAIL-NH 与 FI、FP 和综合老年评估之间的公平至中度一致性。十项研究评估了不同 FRAIL-NH 截断值的敏感性和特异性,≥8 对根据 FI 分类居民为衰弱的敏感性(94.1%)和特异性(82.8%)最高,而两项研究分别报告了基于 FI 和 FP 的最佳截断值≥2。

结论

在七年内,FRAIL-NH 量表已在 20 个国家应用,并已改编成三种语言。尽管使用了一系列截断值,但 FRAIL-NH 与更高的护理需求相关,并与其他经过验证但更复杂的量表具有良好的一致性。FRAIL-NH 对不同环境下的不良结局具有预测性,这突出了其在指导养老院衰弱居民护理方面的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c4/12275552/98e6883396e1/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验