Miller Robert J H, Klein Eyal, Gransar Heidi, Slomka Piotr J, Friedman John D, Hayes Sean, Thomson Louise, Tamarappoo Balaji, Rozanski Alan, Berman Daniel S
Departments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Departments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Aug 15;313:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
Accurate risk stratification in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) is critical for patient management. Prior myocardial infarction (MI) or revascularization without MI are often equated as known CAD. We compared the prognostic significance of prior MI and previous revascularization in patients undergoing single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).
Consecutive patients undergoing SPECT MPI at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center between 1992 and 2012 were included. Medical history, including history of MI or revascularization, was collected prospectively. Association with all-cause mortality was assessed with multivariable Cox analysis, adjusted for patient demographics, medical history, medications, and SPECT MPI results.
In total, 50,121 patients were identified including 7428 (14.8%) with a history of previous MI and 3608 (7.2%) with a history of revascularization without prior MI. During a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 19,696 (39.3%) patients died including 4467 (60.1%) with a history of MI and 1880 (52.1%) with a history of revascularization. Prior MI (adjusted HR 1.12, p=0.001) and prior revascularization without MI (adjusted HR 1.15, p<0.001) were independently associated with increased all-cause mortality. Previous MI (adjusted HR 1.27, p<0.001) and previous revascularization without MI (adjusted HR 1.21, p<0.001) were significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality only in patients without ischemia.
In this large cohort of patients undergoing SPECT MPI, previous MI and previous revascularization without MI were independent predictors of all-cause mortality, with no significant difference in associated risk. History of CAD may be particularly important for risk stratification in patients without ischemia.
已知冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的准确风险分层对患者管理至关重要。既往心肌梗死(MI)或无MI的血运重建常被等同于已知CAD。我们比较了既往MI和既往血运重建在接受单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)心肌灌注成像(MPI)患者中的预后意义。
纳入1992年至2012年间在雪松西奈医疗中心接受SPECT MPI的连续患者。前瞻性收集病史,包括MI或血运重建史。通过多变量Cox分析评估与全因死亡率的关联,并对患者人口统计学、病史、药物治疗和SPECT MPI结果进行校正。
共纳入50121例患者,其中7428例(14.8%)有既往MI史,3608例(7.2%)有既往无MI的血运重建史。在中位随访8.0年期间,19696例(39.3%)患者死亡,其中4467例(60.1%)有MI史,1880例(52.1%)有血运重建史。既往MI(校正风险比[HR]1.12,p = 0.001)和既往无MI的血运重建(校正HR 1.15,p<0.001)与全因死亡率增加独立相关。仅在无缺血的患者中,既往MI(校正HR 1.27,p<0.001)和既往无MI的血运重建(校正HR 1.21,p<0.001)与全因死亡率增加显著相关。
在这一接受SPECT MPI的大型患者队列中,既往MI和既往无MI的血运重建是全因死亡率的独立预测因素,相关风险无显著差异。CAD病史对于无缺血患者的风险分层可能尤为重要。