Pan Pan, Su Longxiang, Zhang Qing, Long Yun, Wang Xiaoting, Liu Dawei
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Center of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Apr 15;7:111. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00111. eCollection 2020.
A series of quality control (QC) targets (SpO2≠100%, PaCO2≮40 mmHg, Pmean≯10 cmH2O) was put forward and widely used in a single intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The aim of this study was to assess whether these QC targets could improve the outcomes of critically ill patients. The real-time clinical data of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation at ICU admission between May 2013 and May 2017 in the Department of Critical Care Medicine of Peking Union Medical College Hospital were collected and analyzed. A total of 7,670 patients [mean age, 58 years; 3,943 (51.5%) male] were divided into the before QC ( = 3,936) and after QC ( = 3,734) groups. QC targets (SpO2, PaCO2, and Pmean) and respiratory parameters (FiO2%, PaO2, PEEP, tidal volume, and respiratory rate) within 72 h of ICU admission, primary outcomes (ICU mortality, 28-, 60-, and 90-day mortality) and secondary outcomes (discharge against medical advice, ICU admission days, mechanical ventilation times, and central venous pressure) were measured and compared between the before and after QC groups. The 72 h average of the Pmean, FiO2%, PaO2, and VT were significantly lower and PaCO2 was higher in the after QC than in the before QC group ( < 0.05). A lower 90-day mortality rate, less discharge against medical advice, fewer ICU admission days, and reduced mechanical ventilation times were found in the after QC group compared with the before QC group ( < 0.05). Interestingly, CVP was significantly lower in the after QC group than in the before QC group ( < 0.05). The QC targets (SpO2≠100%, PaCO2≮40 mmHg, Pmean≯10 cmH2O) contributed to avoiding high oxygen level hazards, protecting against lung injury, and improving circulatory function, which resulted in a better prognosis of critically ill patients.
提出了一系列质量控制(QC)指标(血氧饱和度[SpO₂]≠100%,动脉血二氧化碳分压[PaCO₂]≮40 mmHg,平均气道压[Pmean]≯10 cmH₂O)并在单个重症监护病房(ICU)环境中广泛应用。本研究的目的是评估这些质量控制指标是否能改善危重症患者的预后。收集并分析了2013年5月至2017年5月在北京协和医院重症医学科ICU入院时接受机械通气患者的实时临床数据。共7670例患者[平均年龄58岁;3943例(51.5%)为男性]被分为质量控制前(n = 3936)和质量控制后(n = 3734)两组。测量并比较了质量控制前后两组患者在ICU入院72小时内的质量控制指标(SpO₂、PaCO₂和Pmean)和呼吸参数(吸氧浓度[FiO₂%]、动脉血氧分压[PaO₂]、呼气末正压[PEEP]、潮气量和呼吸频率)、主要结局(ICU死亡率、28天、60天和90天死亡率)以及次要结局(自动出院、ICU住院天数、机械通气时间和中心静脉压)。质量控制后组的Pmean、FiO₂%、PaO₂和潮气量(VT)的72小时平均值显著低于质量控制前组,而PaCO₂则高于质量控制前组(P < 0.05)。与质量控制前组相比,质量控制后组的90天死亡率更低、自动出院更少、ICU住院天数更少且机械通气时间缩短(P < 0.05)。有趣的是,质量控制后组的中心静脉压显著低于质量控制前组(P < 0.05)。质量控制指标(SpO₂≠100%,PaCO₂≮40 mmHg,Pmean≯10 cmH₂O)有助于避免高氧水平危害、预防肺损伤并改善循环功能,从而使危重症患者的预后更好。