• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者作为研究的合作伙伴:研究人员有很多帮助。

Patients as Partners in Research: There Is Plenty of Help for Researchers.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 May;50(5):219-221. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.0104.

DOI:10.2519/jospt.2020.0104
PMID:32354313
Abstract

If including patients as equal partners in health care research is increasingly regarded as "the right thing to do," then it is important that researchers and patients "do it right." The research community should be aware of, use, and share resources that support best practices in this domain. The first editorial in the series focused on why researchers should engage patient partners on research teams. In this, the second editorial in the series, we concentrate on how to engage patient partners and highlight a selection of resources to help researchers and to demystify patient partnerships in research. .

摘要

如果将患者视为医疗保健研究中的平等伙伴越来越被视为“正确的做法”,那么研究人员和患者“正确地这样做”就很重要。研究界应该了解、使用和共享支持该领域最佳实践的资源。该系列的第一篇社论重点介绍了为什么研究人员应该让患者伙伴参与研究团队。在本系列的第二篇社论中,我们专注于如何让患者伙伴参与进来,并重点介绍了一系列资源,以帮助研究人员并揭开研究中患者伙伴关系的神秘面纱。

相似文献

1
Patients as Partners in Research: There Is Plenty of Help for Researchers.患者作为研究的合作伙伴:研究人员有很多帮助。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 May;50(5):219-221. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.0104.
2
Patients as Partners in Research: How to Talk About Compensation With Patient Partners.患者作为研究的伙伴:如何与患者伙伴谈论补偿。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Aug;50(8):413-414. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.0106.
3
Patients as Partners in Research: A Practical Example of How Researchers Are Contributing to the Patient-Partnership Revolution.患者作为研究的伙伴:研究人员如何为患者伙伴关系革命做出贡献的一个实际例子。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Jul;50(7):347-349. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.0105.
4
Patients as Partners in Research: It's the Right Thing to Do.患者参与研究:这是正确的做法。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Sep;49(9):623-626. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.0106.
5
Involving People With Lived Experience as Partners in Musculoskeletal Research: Lessons From a Survey of Aotearoa/New Zealand Musculoskeletal Researchers.让有亲身经历的人作为肌肉骨骼研究的合作伙伴:来自新西兰肌肉骨骼研究人员调查的经验教训。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jun;52(6):307-311. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10986. Epub 2022 May 16.
6
Increasing the Impact of Peer-Reviewed Publications Through Tailored Dissemination Strategies: Perspectives for Practice Feature in JOSPT.通过量身定制的传播策略提高同行评审出版物的影响力:《矫形与运动物理治疗杂志》实践专栏的观点
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;46(7):500-1. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.0110.
7
Broken Machines or Active Bodies? Part 1. Ways of Talking About Health and Why It Matters.损坏的机器还是活跃的身体?第一部分。谈论健康的方式及其重要性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023 May;53(5):236–238. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11879.
8
Evidence in Practice: A New Series for Clinicians.实践中的证据:临床医生的新系列。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;48(6):429. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.0105.
9
Types of Research Questions: Descriptive, Predictive, or Causal.研究问题的类型:描述性、预测性或因果性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Aug;50(8):468-469. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.0703.
10
Growth and Consequences.生长与后果
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;46(8):610-2. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.0111.

引用本文的文献

1
Recognising Consumers' Contributions to Health Research: Co-Designing a Remuneration Framework for the Australian Context.认识消费者对健康研究的贡献:为澳大利亚背景共同设计薪酬框架。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70314. doi: 10.1111/hex.70314.
2
Implementing the patient partnership approach to quality improvement of care and services: A multiple case study protocol.实施患者伙伴关系方法以改善医疗服务质量:一项多案例研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 22;19(7):e0307160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307160. eCollection 2024.
3
Intersectionality as a theoretical framework for researching health inequities in chronic pain.
交叉性作为研究慢性疼痛中健康不平等问题的理论框架。
Br J Pain. 2023 Oct;17(5):479-490. doi: 10.1177/20494637231188583. Epub 2023 Jul 9.
4
Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process.研究指南与清单中协同设计首选组件的开发:一项范围综述及改良德尔菲法流程的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 30;12:e50463. doi: 10.2196/50463.
5
Toward patient-centered treatment goals for duchenne muscular dystrophy: insights from the "Your Voice" study.迈向以患者为中心的杜氏肌营养不良症治疗目标:来自“Your Voice”研究的见解。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Apr 20;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02674-w.
6
Patient-partner engagement at the Centre de recherche du CHUS in the Province of Québec, Canada: from an intuitive methodology to outreach after three years of implementation.加拿大魁北克省CHUS研究中心的患者-伴侣参与情况:从直观方法到实施三年后的推广。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 16;7(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00258-1.