Radadiya Dhruvil, Gonzalez-Estrada Alexei, Lira-Vera Jorge Emilio, Lizarrga-Torres Katia, Mahapatra Shayan Sinha, Murguia-Fuentes Ricardo, Niezen Sebastian, Mohan Kaushik, Reddy Chakradhar, Devani Kalpit
Department of Internal Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, United States.
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2020 May;8(5):E598-E606. doi: 10.1055/a-1122-8566. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
Colonoscopy is an effective tool to prevent colorectal cancer. Social media has emerged as a source of medical information for patients.YouTube (a video sharing website) is the most popular video informative source. Therefore, we aimed to assess the educational quality of colonoscopy videos available on YouTube. We performed a YouTube search using the keyword "colonoscopy" yielded 429 videos, of which 255 met the inclusion criteria. Colonoscopy Data Quality Score (C-DQS) was created to rate the quality of the videos (-10 to +40 points) based on a colonoscopy education video available on the Ameican Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) website. Each video was scored by six blinded reviewers independently using C-DQS. The Global Quality Score (GQS) was used for score validation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the similarity of the scores among reviewers. Professional societies had the highest number of videos (44.3 %). Videos from professional societies (6.94) and media (6.87) had significantly higher mean C-DQS compared to those from alternative medicine providers (1.19), companies (1.16), and patients (2.60) ( < 0.05). Mean C-DQS score of videos from healthcare providers (4.40) was not statistically different than other sources. There was a high degree of agreement among reviewers for the videos from all sources (ICC = 0.934; < 0.001). YouTube videos are a poor source of information on colonoscopy. Professional societies and media are better sources of quality information for patient education on colonoscopy. The medical community may need to engage actively in enriching the quality of educational material available on YouTube.
结肠镜检查是预防结直肠癌的有效工具。社交媒体已成为患者获取医学信息的来源。YouTube(一个视频分享网站)是最受欢迎的视频信息源。因此,我们旨在评估YouTube上结肠镜检查视频的教育质量。
我们使用关键词“结肠镜检查”在YouTube上进行搜索,得到429个视频,其中255个符合纳入标准。基于美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)网站上的一个结肠镜检查教育视频,创建了结肠镜检查数据质量评分(C-DQS)来对视频质量进行评分(-10至+40分)。每个视频由六名不知情的评审员独立使用C-DQS进行评分。全球质量评分(GQS)用于评分验证。组内相关系数(ICC)用于评估评审员之间评分的相似性。
专业协会的视频数量最多(44.3%)。与替代医学提供者(1.19)、公司(1.16)和患者(2.60)的视频相比,专业协会(6.94)和媒体(6.87)的视频平均C-DQS显著更高(<0.05)。医疗保健提供者的视频平均C-DQS评分(4.40)与其他来源在统计学上没有差异。所有来源的视频在评审员之间都有高度的一致性(ICC = 0.934;<0.001)。
YouTube视频是结肠镜检查信息的不良来源。专业协会和媒体是患者结肠镜检查教育优质信息的更好来源。医学界可能需要积极参与提高YouTube上可用教育材料的质量。