Suppr超能文献

与结直肠癌筛查相关的YouTube视频质量

Quality of YouTube Videos Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening.

作者信息

Kahlam Aaron, Pai Suraj, Kahlam Jasneel, Ahlawat Sushil

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.

Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jan 12;15(1):e33684. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33684. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction YouTube, an unregulated video-sharing website, is the second most visited website on the internet. As more patients turn to the internet for information about colon cancer screening, it is important to understand what they are consuming online. Our goal was to evaluate YouTube videos about colon cancer screening to better understand the information patients are accessing. Methods We searched YouTube on October 28, 2020, using the following search terms sorted by relevance and view count: colonoscopy, colon cancer screening, virtual colonoscopy, colonoscopy alternatives, and cologuard. Videos longer than 10 minutes, not in English, and duplicates were excluded. Three evaluators graded each video using the DISCERN criteria. Numerical data were averaged into a composite score. Two-sided t-tests and one-way ANOVA tests were used to compare mean ratings between groups. Results Fifty videos were analyzed, with a total of 23,148,938 views, averaging 462,979 views per video. The average overall rating was 3.16/5. There was no difference between search methods, search terms, or presence of a physician. The average ratings for videos with gastroenterologists (3.08), other physicians (3.35), and non-physicians (3.09) were not significantly different. Videos without physicians had more views on average (1,148,677) compared to videos with gastroenterologists (157,846, p=0.013) or other physicians (35,730, p=0.013). Conclusion YouTube videos related to colon cancer screening were of good quality regardless of search terms, search methods, or presence of a physician. However, videos without physicians were viewed more frequently. Physicians should continue making videos that address deficits while increasing viewership.

摘要

引言 YouTube是一个不受监管的视频分享网站,是互联网上访问量第二大的网站。随着越来越多的患者转向互联网获取有关结肠癌筛查的信息,了解他们在网上浏览的内容非常重要。我们的目标是评估YouTube上有关结肠癌筛查的视频,以更好地了解患者获取的信息。方法 我们于2020年10月28日在YouTube上进行搜索,使用按相关性和观看次数排序的以下搜索词:结肠镜检查、结肠癌筛查、虚拟结肠镜检查、结肠镜检查替代方法和便隐血检测。时长超过10分钟、非英语以及重复的视频被排除。三名评估人员使用DISCERN标准对每个视频进行评分。数值数据被平均为一个综合分数。使用双侧t检验和单因素方差分析来比较组间平均评分。结果 共分析了50个视频,总观看次数为23,148,938次,每个视频平均观看次数为462,979次。平均总体评分为3.16/5。搜索方法、搜索词或是否有医生参与之间没有差异。有胃肠病学家参与的视频(3.08)、有其他医生参与的视频(3.35)和无医生参与的视频(3.09)的平均评分没有显著差异。与有胃肠病学家参与的视频(157,846次,p = 0.013)或有其他医生参与的视频(35,730次,p = 0.013)相比,无医生参与的视频平均观看次数更多(1,148,677次)。结论 与结肠癌筛查相关的YouTube视频,无论搜索词、搜索方法或是否有医生参与,质量都不错。然而,无医生参与的视频观看频率更高。医生应继续制作解决不足之处同时提高观看量的视频。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验