Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Kayseri City Hospital, Turkey, Kayseri, Turkey.
Clinic of Radiology, Kayseri City Hospital, Turkey, Kayseri, Turkey.
Radiol Med. 2021 Jan;126(1):14-21. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01201-2. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
We evaluated the dosimetric results of the identification of the left ventricle (LV) and left anterior descending artery (LAD) as organs at risk (OARs) in adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).
Twenty-two patients who had previously received RT in our center were evaluated retrospectively. All patients had undergone BCS operation for left breast cancer. LV and LAD were contoured as OARs on the same simulation CTs for these patients whose treatment was previously completed in which LV and LAD were not defined as OARs. Complying with the initial plans, intensity-modulated RT plans with 7-9 fields were made on the computer. Planning target volume (PTV), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), monitor unit (MU) values, and doses of OARs were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.05).
There were no significant differences in PTV 50 (D 50% and D 98%), PTV 60 (D 2% and D 50%), HI, CI, and MU values when treatment plans and control plans were compared (p > 0.05). While it was possible to protect the heart, LAD, and LV better, LAD and LV were not contoured in the treatment plans, and they received higher doses compared to the control plans (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the other OARs.
In conclusion, it is essential to define the lower anatomical regions of the heart as OARs. Otherwise, the doses taken by these regions are ignored and may be maintained less than possible. In our study, it was shown that LV and LAD doses were significantly reduced even in the same center and planning by the same team.
我们评估了在保乳手术后辅助放疗(RT)中识别左心室(LV)和左前降支(LAD)作为危及器官(OAR)的剂量学结果。
回顾性评估了 22 例先前在我们中心接受 RT 的患者。所有患者均因左侧乳腺癌接受了保乳手术。在这些患者的同一模拟 CT 上勾画了 LV 和 LAD 作为 OAR,这些患者的治疗之前完成,LV 和 LAD 未被定义为 OAR。根据初始计划,在计算机上制作了 7-9 野强度调制 RT 计划。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较计划靶区(PTV)、均匀性指数(HI)、适形指数(CI)、监测单位(MU)值和 OAR 剂量(p<0.05)。
当比较治疗计划和对照计划时,PTV50(D50%和 D98%)、PTV60(D2%和 D50%)、HI、CI 和 MU 值没有显著差异(p>0.05)。虽然可以更好地保护心脏、LAD 和 LV,但在治疗计划中没有勾画 LAD 和 LV,它们的剂量比对照计划高(p<0.05)。其他 OAR 没有显著差异。
总之,将心脏的下部解剖区域定义为 OAR 是至关重要的。否则,这些区域的剂量将被忽略,并且可能保持在尽可能低的水平。在我们的研究中,即使在同一个中心和同一个团队进行规划,LV 和 LAD 的剂量也明显降低。