Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 420-757 West Hastings St. - Federal Tower, Vancouver, BC, V6C 1A1, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Environ Health. 2020 May 1;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-00601-1.
Nitrogen dioxide (NO) is a pervasive urban pollutant originating primarily from vehicle emissions. Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is associated with a considerable public health burden worldwide, but whether NO exposure is causally related to IHD morbidity remains in question. Our objective was to determine whether short term exposure to outdoor NO is causally associated with IHD-related morbidity based on a synthesis of findings from case-crossover and time-series studies.
MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Global Health and Toxline databases were searched using terms developed by a librarian. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were completed independently by two reviewers. Conflicts between reviewers were resolved through consensus and/or involvement of a third reviewer. Pooling of results across studies was conducted using random effects models, heterogeneity among included studies was assessed using Cochran's Q and I measures, and sources of heterogeneity were evaluated using meta-regression. Sensitivity of pooled estimates to individual studies was examined using Leave One Out analysis and publication bias was evaluated using Funnel plots, Begg's and Egger's tests, and trim and fill.
Thirty-eight case-crossover studies and 48 time-series studies were included in our analysis. NO was significantly associated with IHD morbidity (pooled odds ratio from case-crossover studies: 1.074 95% CI 1.052-1.097; pooled relative risk from time-series studies: 1.022 95% CI 1.016-1.029 per 10 ppb). Pooled estimates for case-crossover studies from Europe and North America were significantly lower than for studies conducted elsewhere. The high degree of heterogeneity among studies was only partially accounted for in meta-regression. There was evidence of publication bias, particularly for case-crossover studies. For both case-crossover and time-series studies, pooled estimates based on multi-pollutant models were smaller than those from single pollutant models, and those based on older populations were larger than those based on younger populations, but these differences were not statistically significant.
We concluded that there is a likely causal relationship between short term NO exposure and IHD-related morbidity, but important uncertainties remain, particularly related to the contribution of co-pollutants or other concomitant exposures, and the lack of supporting evidence from toxicological and controlled human studies.
二氧化氮(NO)是一种普遍存在的城市污染物,主要来源于车辆排放。缺血性心脏病(IHD)是全球范围内与相当大的公共卫生负担相关的疾病,但 NO 暴露是否与 IHD 发病率有因果关系仍存在疑问。我们的目的是根据病例交叉和时间序列研究的综合结果,确定短期暴露于室外 NO 是否与 IHD 相关的发病率有因果关系。
使用图书馆员制定的术语,在 MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、全球卫生和 Toxline 数据库中进行搜索。两名评审员独立进行筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。评审员之间的分歧通过协商解决,或由第三名评审员介入解决。使用随机效应模型对研究进行汇总,使用 Cochran's Q 和 I 测量评估纳入研究的异质性,并使用元回归评估异质性的来源。使用 Leave One Out 分析检查汇总估计值对个别研究的敏感性,并使用漏斗图、Begg 和 Egger 检验以及修剪和填充评估发表偏倚。
我们的分析纳入了 38 项病例交叉研究和 48 项时间序列研究。NO 与 IHD 发病率显著相关(病例交叉研究的汇总优势比:1.074,95%置信区间 1.052-1.097;时间序列研究的汇总相对风险:1.022,95%置信区间 1.016-1.029/每 10 ppb)。来自欧洲和北美的病例交叉研究的汇总估计值明显低于其他地方的研究。研究之间的高度异质性仅部分在元回归中得到解释。有证据表明存在发表偏倚,尤其是对于病例交叉研究。对于病例交叉和时间序列研究,多污染物模型的汇总估计值小于单一污染物模型,而基于较老人群的汇总估计值大于基于较年轻人群的汇总估计值,但这些差异无统计学意义。
我们的结论是,短期 NO 暴露与 IHD 相关的发病率之间可能存在因果关系,但仍存在重要的不确定性,特别是与共污染物或其他伴随暴露的贡献有关,以及缺乏来自毒理学和对照人体研究的支持证据。