Lin Zili, Wang Zhenyu, Chen Gang, Lin Taotao, Liu Wenge
Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;140:e53-e60. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.136. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
To explore 1) whether the degree of facet joint distraction during single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy affects functional outcome and 2) whether the degree of facet joint distraction is related to cervical sagittal parameters.
This study retrospectively analyzed data from 72 patients with single-segment cervical spondylotic radiculopathy from January 2013 to December 2018. Lateral cervical radiographs were performed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Disc height, interfacet distance, and segmental angle were measured from the lateral cervical radiographs to evaluate facet joint distraction, and cervical sagittal parameters were measured. The outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index scores.
Sixty-eight patients were included. ΔInterfacet distance was statistically significant in relation to ΔVAS score (P < 0.01). In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, less than the mean ΔVAS score for all patients was set as a positive result, and the critical value of Δinterfacet distance was 0.7 mm (P = 0.024, area under the curve = 0.659, sensitivity = 46.8%, specificity = 78.8%). According to the critical value determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve, all patients were divided into the appropriate distraction group or the excessive distraction group. There was a significant difference in VAS scores between the 2 groups (P < 0.05).
After undergoing single-segment ACDF for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, patients with an interfacet distance of 0.7 mm or more had worse VAS pain scores. However, this was not related to the improvement in postoperative Neck Disability Index scores; changes in the interfacet distance were not associated with changes in the cervical sagittal parameters.
探讨1)单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗神经根型颈椎病时小关节撑开程度是否影响功能预后,以及2)小关节撑开程度是否与颈椎矢状位参数相关。
本研究回顾性分析了2013年1月至2018年12月期间72名单节段神经根型颈椎病患者的数据。术前及术后12个月拍摄颈椎侧位X线片。从颈椎侧位X线片上测量椎间盘高度、小关节间距和节段角度,以评估小关节撑开情况,并测量颈椎矢状位参数。疗效指标包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈部功能障碍指数评分。
纳入68例患者。小关节间距变化量与VAS评分变化量具有统计学显著相关性(P < 0.01)。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,将所有患者的平均VAS评分变化量以下设定为阳性结果,小关节间距变化量的临界值为0.7 mm(P = 0.024,曲线下面积 = 0.659,灵敏度 = 46.8%,特异度 = 78.8%)。根据受试者工作特征曲线确定的临界值,将所有患者分为合适撑开组或过度撑开组。两组间VAS评分存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。
单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗神经根型颈椎病后,小关节间距为0.7 mm或更大的患者VAS疼痛评分更差。然而,这与术后颈部功能障碍指数评分的改善无关;小关节间距的变化与颈椎矢状位参数的变化无关。