Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415th Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China.
Department of Orthopedics, Hospital (T.C.M) Affiliated to Southwest Medical University, 182th Chunhui Road, Luzhou, Sichuan Province, 646000, People's Republic of China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 15;17(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02983-z.
To evaluate the relationship of postoperative cervical axial pain with different vertebral distraction methods used during ACDF procedures in cervical spondylosis patients.
Ninety-four single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with significantly loss of intervertebral disc height who underwent ACDF surgery in our institute between January 2018 and January 2020 were enrolled. Cervical spine lateral radiographs were taken preoperatively, 3 days, 1-month, 2-month and 6-month after the surgery. The intervertebral disc height (IDH), interfacet distance (IFD), JOA (Japanese Orthopaedic Association) score, NDI (Neck Disability Index) score, nVAS (Neck Visual Analogue Scale) score and aVAS (Arm Visual Analogue Scale) score were measured. The correlation of clinical parameters and intervertebral disc height was evaluated. Then the correlation of clinical outcomes and different distraction method was evaluated. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, one uses Casper pin distractor system alone for distraction (Caspar alone group) and the other uses spreader assisted distraction method (Casper + spreader group). In biomechanical study, four cervical spine cadavers were selected for facet pressure measurements under different vertebral distraction methods, and the facet joint pressure was measured using force sensors.
Satisfactory cervical fusion and neurological recovery were achieved in all patients. No significant correlation of IDH, IFD, JOA, NDI or aVAS with nVAS score was found. No significant difference between the change in disc height and clinical outcomes was found. However, by comparing the clinical parameters of patients in different vertebral distraction groups, we found significant changes in the early nVAS and NDI scores (P = 0.11, P = 0.48) of the Casper + spreader group (3 days postoperation), and was associated with a better nVAS score at 2 months postoperation (P < 0.05). The biomechanical study in cervical cadavers also showed significantly and continuously decreased facet joint pressure in the spreader assisted vertebral distraction group (P < 0.01).
Spreader-assisted vertebral distraction method effectively alleviates postoperative neck pain in degenerative cervical spondylosis patients treated with ACDF. The mechanism may be related to the transient relief of facet joint pressure during the vertebral distraction procedure in ACDF.
评估颈椎间盘突出症患者前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)术中不同节段撑开方法与术后颈椎轴向疼痛的关系。
纳入 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月在我院行 ACDF 手术的单节段颈椎脊髓型颈椎病患者 94 例,术前、术后 3d、1 个月、2 个月及 6 个月拍摄颈椎侧位 X 线片,测量椎间隙高度(IDH)、椎间距离(IFD)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分、颈部视觉模拟评分(nVAS)和上肢视觉模拟评分(aVAS)。评估临床参数与椎间隙高度的相关性,然后评估临床疗效与不同撑开方法的相关性。将患者随机分为两组,一组单独使用 Casper 钉撑开系统(Caspar 组),另一组使用撑开器辅助撑开(Caspar+spreader 组)。在生物力学研究中,选择 4 具颈椎尸体,在不同撑开方法下测量小关节压力,使用力传感器测量小关节压力。
所有患者均获得满意的颈椎融合和神经功能恢复。未发现 IDH、IFD、JOA、NDI 或 aVAS 与 nVAS 评分之间存在显著相关性。椎间隙高度的变化与临床疗效无显著差异。然而,通过比较不同撑开组患者的临床参数,发现 Caspar+spreader 组患者术后 3d 的 nVAS 和 NDI 评分早期变化有显著差异(P=0.11,P=0.48),术后 2 个月 nVAS 评分改善与较好(P<0.05)。颈椎尸体的生物力学研究也显示,撑开器辅助撑开组小关节压力显著且持续降低(P<0.01)。
撑开器辅助撑开方法可有效缓解退行性颈椎病患者 ACDF 术后颈痛,其机制可能与 ACDF 术中撑开过程中关节突关节压力的短暂缓解有关。