• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产手术室中的父亲与母婴结局

Fathers in the cesarean section room and maternal/neonatal outcomes.

作者信息

Sakala E P, Henry R A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loma, Linda University Medical Center, CA 92350.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 1988 Fall;8(4):342-6.

PMID:3236104
Abstract

Two hundred twenty-seven consecutive full-term deliveries by cesarean section over a 10-month period were divided into "father present" and "father absent" groups. The father present group tended to have received prenatal care in the private office and to have experienced regional anesthesia more frequently. Apgar scores at one and five minutes were significantly higher when deliveries occurred with the fathers present. The time from skin incision to delivery of neonate was longer but the numbers of transfusions were significantly lower in the father present group. However, when the two groups were further analyzed controlling for anesthesia mode, the differences disappeared with the exception of higher Apgar scores at five minutes with father present and regional anesthesia. No adverse consequences were noted from fathers' presence.

摘要

在10个月期间连续进行的227例足月剖宫产分娩被分为“父亲在场”组和“父亲不在场”组。“父亲在场”组倾向于在私人诊所接受产前护理,且更频繁地接受区域麻醉。当父亲在场时进行分娩,1分钟和5分钟时的阿氏评分显著更高。“父亲在场”组从皮肤切开到新生儿娩出的时间更长,但输血次数显著更低。然而,当对两组进一步分析以控制麻醉方式时,除了父亲在场且采用区域麻醉时5分钟阿氏评分更高外,差异消失。未观察到父亲在场带来的不良后果。

相似文献

1
Fathers in the cesarean section room and maternal/neonatal outcomes.剖宫产手术室中的父亲与母婴结局
J Perinatol. 1988 Fall;8(4):342-6.
2
The effect of general and epidural anesthesia upon neonatal Apgar scores in repeat cesarean section.全身麻醉和硬膜外麻醉对再次剖宫产新生儿阿氏评分的影响。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Nov;155(5):641-5.
3
Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.中央胎儿监护:对围产期结局及剖宫产率的影响
Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00120.x.
4
[Effect of general anesthesia used in cesarean section on maternal-neonatal outcome of pregnancy complicated with severe thrombocytopenia].剖宫产术中全身麻醉对妊娠合并严重血小板减少症母婴结局的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;44(9):665-8.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: the impact of anesthesia.剖宫产术后的母婴结局:麻醉的影响
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Jan;20(1):53-7. doi: 10.1080/14767050601134645.
6
Evaluating the thirty minute interval in emergency cesarean sections.评估急诊剖宫产术中的30分钟间隔时间。
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Aug;179(2):151-5.
7
Skin-to-skin care with the father after cesarean birth and its effect on newborn crying and prefeeding behavior.剖宫产术后父亲与新生儿的皮肤接触护理及其对新生儿啼哭和喂养前行为的影响。
Birth. 2007 Jun;34(2):105-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00162.x.
8
Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference?因怀疑胎儿窘迫而行剖宫产。决定-切开时间有影响吗?
J Reprod Med. 1997 Jun;42(6):347-52.
9
Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.分娩第二阶段与第一阶段相比,经初次剖宫产的母婴结局比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):917-21. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe.
10
[Neonatal effects of uterine incision-to-delivery interval during elective cesarean section under epidural anesthesia].[硬膜外麻醉下择期剖宫产术中子宫切开至分娩间隔对新生儿的影响]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1993 Feb;28(2):67-9, 121.

引用本文的文献

1
Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review.手术室内配偶陪伴行紧急剖宫产术的效果:系统评价。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Dec 1;39(12):939-952. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001761. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
[Mother's experience of planned caesarean section in the absence of the father or companion: Impact of Covid-19 pandemic-related lockdown].[母亲在没有父亲或陪伴者在场情况下进行剖宫产的经历:新冠疫情相关封锁措施的影响]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2022 Jul-Aug;50(7-8):511-518. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 30.