Pandidan Sara, Mechler Adam
La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Biophys Chem. 2020 Jun;262:106381. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2020.106381. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
The mechanism of action of membrane disrupting antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and the basis of their specificity and selectivity to pathogens are often studied by using biomimetic model membranes. It is often assumed that all model membrane morphologies, e.g. liposomes, supported bilayers, tethered bilayers etc. are equivalent. In this work the validity of this assumption was assessed. Melittin was used as the reference AMP as it can disrupt both bacterial and mammalian-mimetic membranes. Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) viscoelastic fingerprints show characteristic differences between the three model morphologies: single bilayer membranes, multilamellar membrane stacks and unilamellar liposomes. In the second and third case, initial trends show material removal instead of material addition as in the single bilayer case, consistent with dissolution of some bilayers, and bursting liposomes, respectively. The latter is accompanied by a characteristic drop in the dissipation signal as the liposomes collapse. The results also highlight an important limitation of the QCM method, the need for a well established reference system for qualitative analysis of the viscoelastic fingerprints, and thus the importance of using the right model system, i.e. single bilayer membrane, for studies of the mechanism of action of AMPs.
膜破坏抗菌肽(AMPs)的作用机制以及它们对病原体的特异性和选择性基础通常通过使用仿生模型膜来研究。人们常常认为所有模型膜形态,例如脂质体、支撑双层膜、拴系双层膜等都是等效的。在这项工作中,评估了这一假设的有效性。蜂毒素被用作参考抗菌肽,因为它既能破坏细菌模拟膜,也能破坏哺乳动物模拟膜。石英晶体微天平(QCM)粘弹性指纹图谱显示了三种模型形态之间的特征差异:单层双层膜、多层膜堆叠和单层脂质体。在第二种和第三种情况下,初始趋势显示的是物质去除,而不是像单层双层膜情况那样的物质添加,分别与一些双层膜的溶解和脂质体破裂一致。后者伴随着脂质体塌陷时耗散信号的特征性下降。结果还突出了QCM方法的一个重要局限性,即需要一个完善的参考系统来对粘弹性指纹图谱进行定性分析,因此强调了使用正确的模型系统(即单层双层膜)来研究抗菌肽作用机制的重要性。