Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Transport, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(5):319-323. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1758933. Epub 2020 May 4.
: Driving anger has been found to be a motivational determinant of risky and aggressive driving. The study reported in this article focused on research questions concerning the conceptualization of driving anger and relationships between driving anger and aggressive driving.: In a cross-sectional survey study, 1,020 regular Serbian drivers completed a web-based online questionnaire. Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to assess the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Driving Anger Scale.: The results showed that the adapted DAS was a valid and reliable instrument divided into five subscales such as discourteous behavior, illegal behavior, slow driving, hostile gestures and traffic obstructions. The robustness of the five-factor model obtained from the EFA was confirmed by the CFA. The study provided evidence supporting the predictive validity of the adapted DAS and revealed that the dimensions of driving anger are differently associated with prosocial and aggressive driving behaviors.: The study supports the adapted DAS validity and produces evidence that driving anger is associated with driving outcomes.
驾驶愤怒被发现是冒险和攻击性驾驶的动机决定因素。本文报道的研究重点关注驾驶愤怒的概念化以及驾驶愤怒与攻击性驾驶之间关系的研究问题。
在一项横断面调查研究中,1020 名普通塞尔维亚司机完成了一项基于网络的在线问卷。探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析用于评估驾驶愤怒量表的因子结构和心理测量特性。
结果表明,改编后的 DAS 是一个有效的和可靠的工具,分为五个子量表,如不礼貌行为、违法行为、慢行、敌对手势和交通堵塞。EFA 获得的五因素模型的稳健性通过 CFA 得到了确认。研究结果支持了改编后的 DAS 的预测有效性,并揭示了驾驶愤怒的各个维度与亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为有不同的关联。
该研究支持改编后的 DAS 的有效性,并提供了证据表明驾驶愤怒与驾驶结果有关。