Suppr超能文献

心脏植入式电子设备患者生物电阻抗分析的安全性与结果

Safety and Results of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

作者信息

Garlini Luíza Matos, Alves Fernanda Donner, Kochi Adriano, Zuchinali Priccila, Zimerman Leandro, Pimentel Mauricio, Perry Ingrid Schweigert, Souza Gabriela Corrêa, Clausell Nadine

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis Porto Alegre RS Brazil Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis - Uniritter, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):169-174. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0098.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the dual interference between cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

METHODS

Forty-three individuals admitted for CIEDs implantation were submitted to a tetrapolar BIA with an alternating current at 800 microA and 50 kHz frequency before and after the devices' implantation. During BIA assessment, continuous telemetry was maintained between the device programmer and the CIEDs in order to look for evidence of possible electric interference in the intracavitary signal of the device.

RESULTS

BIA in patients with CIEDs was safe and not associated with any device malfunction or electrical interference in the intracardiac electrogram of any electrode. After the implantation of the devices, there were significant reductions in BIA measurements of resistance, reactance, and measurements adjusted for height resistance and reactance, reflecting an increase (+ 1 kg; P<0.05) in results of total body water and extracellular water in liter and, consequently, increases in fat-free mass (FFM) and extracellular mass in kg. Because of changes in the hydration status and FFM values, without changes in weight, fat mass was significantly lower (-1.2 kg; P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

BIA assessment in patients with CIEDs was safe and not associated with any device malfunction. The differences in BIA parameters might have occurred because of modifications on the patients' body composition, associated to their hydration status, and not to the CIEDs.

摘要

目的

分析心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)与生物电阻抗分析(BIA)之间的双重干扰。

方法

43例因植入CIED而入院的患者在设备植入前后接受了四极BIA检查,使用800微安的交流电,频率为50千赫。在BIA评估期间,设备编程器与CIED之间保持连续遥测,以寻找设备腔内信号可能存在电干扰的证据。

结果

CIED患者的BIA是安全的,且与任何设备故障或任何电极的心内电图中的电干扰均无关。设备植入后,BIA测量的电阻、电抗以及根据身高调整后的电阻和电抗测量值均显著降低,反映出总体水和细胞外水的升幅(+1千克;P<0.05),进而导致无脂肪质量(FFM)和细胞外质量以千克计增加。由于水合状态和FFM值发生变化,而体重未变,脂肪量显著降低(-1.2千克;P<0.05)。

结论

CIED患者的BIA评估是安全且与任何设备故障均无关。BIA参数的差异可能是由于患者身体成分的改变,与他们的水合状态有关,而非与CIED有关。

相似文献

2
Safety of bioelectrical impedance analysis in advanced heart failure patients.生物电阻抗分析在晚期心力衰竭患者中的安全性。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Oct;43(10):1078-1085. doi: 10.1111/pace.14018. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

3
The role of bioelectrical phase angle in patients with heart failure.生物电相位角在心力衰竭患者中的作用。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023 Jun;24(3):465-477. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09757-2. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

7
The electrical basis of bioimpedance.
Nefrologia. 2012;32(2):133-5. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2012.Jan.11310.
10
Assessment methods in human body composition.人体成分的评估方法。
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008 Sep;11(5):566-72. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32830b5f23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验