Mulasi Urvashi, Kuchnia Adam J, Cole Abigail J, Earthman Carrie P
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota
Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;30(2):180-93. doi: 10.1177/0884533614568155. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
The loss of muscle mass is a defining characteristic of malnutrition, and there is ongoing interest in the assessment of lean tissue at the bedside. Globally, bioimpedance techniques have been widely appreciated for their noninvasiveness, safety, ease of use, portability, and relatively low cost compared with other clinically available methods. In this brief update, we review the 3 primary types of commercially available bioimpedance devices (single- and multiple-frequency and spectroscopy) and differentiate the underlying theory and current applications of each. We also address limitations and potential opportunities for using these devices at the bedside for clinical assessment. Mixed reports in the validation literature for all bioimpedance approaches have raised questions about absolute accuracy to estimate whole body composition in clinical populations, particularly those with abnormal fluid status and/or body geometry in whom underlying method assumptions may be violated. Careful selection of equations can improve whole body estimates by single- and multiple-frequency techniques; however, not all devices will allow for this approach. Research is increasing on the use of bioimpedance variables including phase angle and impedance ratio as potential markers of nutrition status and/or clinical outcomes; consensus on reference cut-points for interpreting these markers has yet to be established. Novel developments in the bioimpedance spectroscopy approach are allowing for improved fluid management in individuals receiving dialysis; these developments have implications for the clinical management of other conditions associated with fluid overload and may also provide enhanced whole body estimates of lean tissue through new modeling procedures.
肌肉量减少是营养不良的一个决定性特征,目前人们对在床边评估瘦组织仍很感兴趣。在全球范围内,生物电阻抗技术因其无创性、安全性、易用性、便携性以及与其他临床可用方法相比成本相对较低而受到广泛认可。在这篇简短的综述中,我们回顾了三种商用生物电阻抗设备(单频和多频以及光谱法)的主要类型,并区分了每种设备的基础理论和当前应用。我们还讨论了在床边使用这些设备进行临床评估的局限性和潜在机会。所有生物电阻抗方法的验证文献中的混合报告引发了对估计临床人群全身成分的绝对准确性的质疑,特别是那些液体状态和/或身体几何形状异常的人群,其基础方法假设可能会被违反。仔细选择方程可以通过单频和多频技术改善全身估计;然而,并非所有设备都允许采用这种方法。关于使用生物电阻抗变量(包括相位角和阻抗比)作为营养状况和/或临床结果的潜在标志物的研究正在增加;对于解释这些标志物的参考切点尚未达成共识。生物电阻抗光谱法的新进展使得接受透析的个体的液体管理得到改善;这些进展对与液体过载相关的其他病症的临床管理具有影响,并且还可能通过新的建模程序提供对瘦组织更好的全身估计。