School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Integr Comp Biol. 2020 Oct 1;60(4):929-942. doi: 10.1093/icb/icaa025.
Most research in comparative cognition focuses on measuring if animals manage certain tasks; fewer studies explore how animals might solve them. We investigated bumblebees' scanning strategies in a numerosity task, distinguishing patterns with two items from four and one from three, and subsequently transferring numerical information to novel numbers, shapes, and colors. Video analyses of flight paths indicate that bees do not determine the number of items by using a rapid assessment of number (as mammals do in "subitizing"); instead, they rely on sequential enumeration even when items are presented simultaneously and in small quantities. This process, equivalent to the motor tagging ("pointing") found for large number tasks in some primates, results in longer scanning times for patterns containing larger numbers of items. Bees used a highly accurate working memory, remembering which items have already been scanned, resulting in fewer than 1% of re-inspections of items before making a decision. Our results indicate that the small brain of bees, with less parallel processing capacity than mammals, might constrain them to use sequential pattern evaluation even for low quantities.
大多数比较认知研究都集中在衡量动物是否能够完成某些任务上;而较少的研究则探讨动物如何解决这些任务。我们研究了大黄蜂在数值任务中的扫描策略,区分了包含两个项目的模式与包含四个和一个项目的模式,然后将数值信息转移到新的数字、形状和颜色上。对飞行轨迹的视频分析表明,蜜蜂并不是通过快速评估数量来确定项目数量的(哺乳动物在“数小”任务中就是这样做的);相反,它们甚至在项目同时呈现且数量少时,也依赖于顺序计数。这个过程与一些灵长类动物在大量任务中发现的运动标记(“指向”)相当,导致包含更多项目的模式的扫描时间更长。蜜蜂使用了高度精确的工作记忆,记住了已经扫描过的项目,从而在做出决策之前,对项目的重新检查次数不到 1%。我们的结果表明,蜜蜂的小大脑,其并行处理能力不及哺乳动物,可能会限制它们即使在数量较少的情况下也使用顺序模式评估。