• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西洛他唑治疗冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入术后阿司匹林不耐受的中国患者。

Cilostazol for Chinese Patients with Aspirin Intolerance after Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2020 May;120(5):857-865. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709520. Epub 2020 May 5.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1709520
PMID:32369856
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is widely used in patients with aspirin intolerance after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in China. However, this empirical strategy is not recommended or even mentioned in Chinese or international guidelines due to a lack of evidence from large-scale studies. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based DAPT in this special population.

METHODS

In this cohort study, patients were grouped according to the DAPT strategy that they received after coronary DES implantation. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Angiographic follow-up and major bleeding events were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 918 patients receiving cilostazol-based DAPT due to aspirin intolerance were enrolled, matched with 918 patients receiving aspirin-based DAPT. After 15-month prospective follow-up, the cilostazol group had lower risk of MACCE (5.1% vs. 7.6%, propensity score adjusted hazard ratio = 0.671 [95% confidence interval 0.462-0.974],  = 0.036) compared with the aspirin group. Lower rate of coronary lesion progression was also found through follow-up angiography in the cilostazol group (17.4% vs. 23.6%,  = 0.022), especially in nontarget lesions (12.1% vs. 17.6%,  = 0.019). The two groups had the same risk of major bleeding events (0.8% vs. 0.4%,  = 0.364).

CONCLUSION

In the current study, cilostazol is a good substitute for aspirin in patients who have aspirin intolerance but need DAPT after coronary DES implantation in China. However, large-scale randomized controlled trials were still required to further confirm its efficacy and safety.

摘要

背景

在中国,在冠状动脉药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后,由于对阿司匹林不耐受,广泛应用西洛他唑为基础的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)。然而,由于缺乏大规模研究的证据,这种经验性策略在中国或国际指南中既不被推荐,甚至都未被提及。我们旨在探讨在这一特殊人群中西洛他唑为基础的 DAPT 的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项队列研究中,患者根据 DES 植入后接受的 DAPT 策略进行分组。主要疗效终点是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs)。还记录了血管造影随访和主要出血事件。

结果

共纳入 918 例因对阿司匹林不耐受而接受西洛他唑为基础的 DAPT 的患者,与 918 例接受阿司匹林为基础的 DAPT 的患者相匹配。经过 15 个月的前瞻性随访,西洛他唑组 MACCE 的风险较低(5.1%比 7.6%,经倾向评分调整的风险比=0.671[95%置信区间 0.462-0.974],=0.036)。西洛他唑组在随访造影时也发现冠状动脉病变进展率较低(17.4%比 23.6%,=0.022),特别是在非靶病变(12.1%比 17.6%,=0.019)。两组大出血事件的风险相同(0.8%比 0.4%,=0.364)。

结论

在目前的研究中,西洛他唑是中国冠状动脉 DES 植入后因对阿司匹林不耐受但需要 DAPT 的患者中阿司匹林的良好替代品。然而,仍需要大规模的随机对照试验来进一步证实其疗效和安全性。

相似文献

1
Cilostazol for Chinese Patients with Aspirin Intolerance after Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.西洛他唑治疗冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入术后阿司匹林不耐受的中国患者。
Thromb Haemost. 2020 May;120(5):857-865. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709520. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
6- Versus 24-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Nonresistant to Aspirin: Final Results of the ITALIC Trial (Is There a Life for DES After Discontinuation of Clopidogrel).抗阿司匹林药物洗脱支架植入术后 6 个月与 24 个月双联抗血小板治疗:ITALIC 试验(停用氯吡格雷后 DES 是否仍有生命力)的最终结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1202-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.049.
3
Cilostazol combined with P2Y receptor inhibitors: A substitute antiplatelet regimen for aspirin-intolerant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation.西洛他唑联合 P2Y 受体抑制剂:一种替代抗血小板方案,用于阿司匹林不耐受患者经皮冠状动脉支架植入术。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Feb;45(2):189-197. doi: 10.1002/clc.23787. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
Triple antithrombotic therapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.药物洗脱支架植入术后房颤患者三联抗栓治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的比较
Coron Artery Dis. 2015 Aug;26(5):372-80. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000242.
5
Prediction of Ischemic and Bleeding Events Using the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score in an Unrestricted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Population.在不受限制的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗人群中使用双联抗血小板治疗评分预测缺血和出血事件。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e006853. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006853.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Guideline-Recommended Risk Score-Directed Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After 2nd-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.指南推荐的风险评分指导下的双联抗血小板治疗在第二代药物洗脱支架后的疗效和安全性。
Circ J. 2020 Jan 24;84(2):161-168. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0667. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Determinants and Clinical Outcomes of Extended Dual Antiplatelet Therapy over 3 Years after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Retrospective Analysis.药物洗脱支架置入后 3 年以上延长双联抗血小板治疗的决定因素和临床结局:回顾性分析。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Jul;61(7):597-605. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.7.597.
8
Randomized Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Comparison of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy vs Triple-Antiplatelet Therapy to Reduce Neointimal Tissue Proliferation in Diabetic Patients.双抗血小板治疗与三联抗血小板治疗减少糖尿病患者新生内膜组织增殖的随机血管造影和血管内超声比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Mar;29(3):76-81.
9
Prevalence, Management, and Long-Term (6-Year) Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents.药物洗脱冠状动脉支架置入患者的房颤患病率、治疗及 6 年随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 12;10(11):1075-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.028. Epub 2017 May 17.
10
Novel insights on dual antiplatelet therapy duration following stenting for angiography-detected moderate-to-severe calcified coronary lesions.经血管造影检测到的中等至重度钙化冠状动脉病变支架置入后双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的新见解。
Pharmacol Res. 2024 Oct;208:107378. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107378. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.吲哚布芬与阿司匹林用于老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的比较
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04843-0.
2
Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs. Aspirin in Addition to Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease Patients with Gastrointestinal Disease.胃肠道疾病的冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,低剂量利伐沙班与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷的对比研究
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1007/s10557-025-07682-5.
3
Real-world performance of indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the ASPIRATION registry.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后吲哚布芬与阿司匹林的真实世界疗效:来自 ASPIRATION 注册研究的结果。
BMC Med. 2024 Apr 2;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03374-3.
4
Comparison of Cilostazol versus Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients with Ischemic Stroke who Underwent Intracranial or Extracranial Artery Stent Implantation.颅内或颅外动脉支架置入术后缺血性脑卒中患者加用西洛他唑与氯吡格雷的比较。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Aug 1;30(8):1010-1021. doi: 10.5551/jat.63632. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
5
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Outcome Impact of Cilostazol in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or at a High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.一项评估西洛他唑对冠心病患者或心血管疾病高危患者结局影响的随机对照试验。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 6;12(6):938. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060938.
6
Cilostazol combined with P2Y receptor inhibitors: A substitute antiplatelet regimen for aspirin-intolerant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation.西洛他唑联合 P2Y 受体抑制剂:一种替代抗血小板方案,用于阿司匹林不耐受患者经皮冠状动脉支架植入术。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Feb;45(2):189-197. doi: 10.1002/clc.23787. Epub 2022 Feb 4.