• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肌钙蛋白释放策略与常规治疗的检测限:随机对照试验。

Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Carlton Edward Watts, Ingram Jenny, Taylor Hazel, Glynn Joel, Kandiyali Rebecca, Campbell Sarah, Beasant Lucy, Aziz Shahid, Beresford Peter, Kendall Jason, Reuben Adam, Smith Jason E, Chapman Rebecca, Creanor Siobhan, Benger Jonathan Richard

机构信息

Emergency Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Heart. 2020 Oct;106(20):1586-1594. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692. Epub 2020 May 5.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692
PMID:32371401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7525793/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The clinical effectiveness of a 'rule-out' acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial, across eight hospitals in the UK, aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness of an undetectable hs-cTn and ECG (limit of detection and ECG discharge (LoDED)) discharge strategy. Eligible adult patients presented with chest pain; the treating clinician intended to perform investigations to rule out an ACS; the initial ECG was non-ischaemic; and peak symptoms occurred <6 hours previously. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either the LoDED strategy or the usual rule-out strategy. The primary outcome was discharge from the hospital within 4 hours of arrival, without a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days.

RESULTS

Between June 2018 and March 2019, 632 patients were randomised; 3 were later withdrawn. Of 629 patients (age 53.8 (SD 16.1) years, 41% women), 7% had a MACE within 30 days. For the LoDED strategy, 141 of 309 (46%) patients were discharged within 4 hours, without MACE within 30 days, and for usual care, 114 of 311 (37%); pooled adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.98). No patient with an initial undetectable hs-cTn had a MACE within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

The LoDED strategy facilitates safe early discharge in >40% of patients with chest pain. Clinical effectiveness is variable when compared with existing rule-out strategies and influenced by wider system factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN86184521.

摘要

引言

对于急诊科胸痛患者,采用“排除”急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)策略的临床有效性尚不清楚,该策略包括就诊时单次检测不到的高敏心肌肌钙蛋白(hs-cTn)以及非缺血性心电图。

方法

在英国的八家医院进行了一项随机对照试验,旨在确定检测不到的hs-cTn和心电图(检测限和心电图出院(LoDED))出院策略的临床有效性。符合条件的成年患者出现胸痛;主治医生打算进行检查以排除ACS;初始心电图为非缺血性;且峰值症状出现在6小时内。参与者按1:1随机分为LoDED策略组或常规排除策略组。主要结局是到达医院后4小时内出院,且30天内无重大不良心脏事件(MACE)。

结果

2018年6月至2019年3月期间,632例患者被随机分组;3例后来退出。在629例患者(年龄53.8(标准差16.1)岁,41%为女性)中,7%在30天内发生了MACE。对于LoDED策略,309例患者中有141例(46%)在4小时内出院,30天内无MACE,对于常规治疗,311例患者中有114例(37%);合并调整后的比值比为1.58(95%置信区间0.84至2.98)。初始hs-cTn检测不到的患者在30天内均未发生MACE。

结论

LoDED策略有助于40%以上的胸痛患者安全早期出院。与现有的排除策略相比,临床有效性存在差异,并受更广泛的系统因素影响。

试验注册号

ISRCTN86184521。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/3c989d11d9b4/heartjnl-2020-316692f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/22afc2322178/heartjnl-2020-316692f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/8f3da8a949b4/heartjnl-2020-316692f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/2bff1e77442d/heartjnl-2020-316692f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/3c989d11d9b4/heartjnl-2020-316692f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/22afc2322178/heartjnl-2020-316692f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/8f3da8a949b4/heartjnl-2020-316692f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/2bff1e77442d/heartjnl-2020-316692f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f214/7525793/3c989d11d9b4/heartjnl-2020-316692f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial.肌钙蛋白释放策略与常规治疗的检测限:随机对照试验。
Heart. 2020 Oct;106(20):1586-1594. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
Randomised controlled trial of the Limit of Detection of Troponin and ECG Discharge (LoDED) strategy versus usual care in adult patients with chest pain attending the emergency department: study protocol.急诊科胸痛成年患者肌钙蛋白检测限与心电图出院(LoDED)策略对比常规治疗的随机对照试验:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 2;8(10):e025339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025339.
3
The objective CORE score allows early rule out in acute chest pain patients.客观CORE评分有助于早期排除急性胸痛患者。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2018 Dec;52(6):308-314. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2018.1546891. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
4
Stress CMR reduces revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain.应激 CMR 可减少中危急性胸痛患者的血运重建、住院再入院和再次心脏检查。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;6(7):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.022. Epub 2013 May 8.
5
A direct comparison of decision rules for early discharge of suspected acute coronary syndromes in the era of high sensitivity troponin.高敏肌钙蛋白时代疑似急性冠脉综合征早期出院决策规则的直接比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Aug;8(5):421-431. doi: 10.1177/2048872618755369. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
6
The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge.HEART 路径随机试验:识别可早期出院的急性胸痛急诊科患者。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):195-203. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001384. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
7
ICare-ACS (Improving Care Processes for Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome): A Study of Cross-System Implementation of a National Clinical Pathway.ICare-ACS(改善疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的护理流程):一项全国临床路径跨系统实施的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 23;137(4):354-363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031984. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
8
A Randomized Trial of a 1-Hour Troponin T Protocol in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes: The Rapid Assessment of Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department With High-Sensitivity Troponin T Study (RAPID-TnT).一项在疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者中应用 1 小时肌钙蛋白 T 方案的随机试验:高敏肌钙蛋白 T 在急诊科快速评估疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的研究(RAPID-TnT)。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 5;140(19):1543-1556. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042891. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
9
HEART Score Recalibration Using Higher Sensitivity Troponin T.使用更高灵敏度肌钙蛋白 T 对 HEART 评分进行重新校准。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Oct;82(4):449-462. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.04.024. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
10
Feasibility of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule to safely reduce unnecessary hospital admissions: a pilot randomised controlled trial.曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征 (MACS) 决策规则降低不必要住院的可行性:一项试点随机对照试验。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Sep;34(9):586-592. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206148. Epub 2017 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Care Resource Utilization for Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the RACE-IT Randomized Clinical Trial.疑似心肌梗死患者的医疗资源利用:RACE-IT随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256930. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6930.
2
Evaluation of sex-specific 0-h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T thresholds for the risk stratification of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.评估非ST段抬高型心肌梗死风险分层的性别特异性0小时高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T阈值
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Apr 17;63(7):1443-1452. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1118. Print 2025 Jun 26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of rapid rule out of myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity troponin: cross-sectional survey of English hospitals.应用高敏肌钙蛋白进行心肌梗死快速排除的实施情况:英国医院的横断面调查。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Apr;37(4):229-231. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209100. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
2
A Randomized Trial of a 1-Hour Troponin T Protocol in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes: The Rapid Assessment of Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department With High-Sensitivity Troponin T Study (RAPID-TnT).一项在疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者中应用 1 小时肌钙蛋白 T 方案的随机试验:高敏肌钙蛋白 T 在急诊科快速评估疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的研究(RAPID-TnT)。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 5;140(19):1543-1556. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042891. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays: From Implementation to Resource Utilization and Cost Effectiveness.
高敏心肌肌钙蛋白检测:从实施到资源利用及成本效益
J Appl Lab Med. 2025 May 2;10(3):710-730. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae161.
4
Single high-sensitivity troponin-I for ruling out acute coronary syndrome: a detection limit approach.采用单一高敏肌钙蛋白I排除急性冠状动脉综合征:一种检测限方法。
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Nov 20;4(6):oeae094. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae094. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Effectiveness of accelerated diagnostic protocols for reducing emergency department length of stay in patients presenting with chest pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.加速诊断方案在降低胸痛患者急诊留观时间方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 22;19(10):e0309767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309767. eCollection 2024.
6
How to Approach Patients with Acute Chest Pain.如何诊治急性胸痛患者。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 22;25(8):302. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508302. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Adoption of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for risk stratification of patients with suspected myocardial infarction: a multicentre cohort study.采用高敏心肌肌钙蛋白对疑似心肌梗死患者进行风险分层:一项多中心队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Jun 13;43:100960. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100960. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Validation of Becton Dickinson Barricor tubes for use with Abbott Alinity and Siemens Atellica highly sensitive cardiac troponin I measuring systems.验证用于雅培Alinity和西门子Atellica高敏心肌肌钙蛋白I测量系统的贝克顿·迪金森Barricor试管。
EJIFCC. 2024 Apr 11;35(1):10-22. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
Complications in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome with Contemporary Care.当代护理下急诊科急性冠状动脉综合征患者的并发症
Cardiology. 2024;149(6):523-532. doi: 10.1159/000538637. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
10
A Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Strategy for Ruling Out Myocardial Infarction.一种用于排除心肌梗死的单一高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T策略。
Emerg Med Int. 2024 Mar 25;2024:2241528. doi: 10.1155/2024/2241528. eCollection 2024.
Randomised controlled trial of the Limit of Detection of Troponin and ECG Discharge (LoDED) strategy versus usual care in adult patients with chest pain attending the emergency department: study protocol.急诊科胸痛成年患者肌钙蛋白检测限与心电图出院(LoDED)策略对比常规治疗的随机对照试验:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 2;8(10):e025339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025339.
4
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2231-2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
5
Prognostic implications of detectable cardiac troponin I below the 99th percentile in patients admitted to an emergency department without acute coronary syndrome.在没有急性冠脉综合征的急诊科患者中,肌钙蛋白 I 在第 99 百分位数以下可检测到对预后的影响。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Oct 25;56(11):1954-1961. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-1140.
6
Evaluating Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay at Presentation.基于就诊时高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 I 测定的急性心肌梗死快速排除评估。
Clin Chem. 2018 May;64(5):820-829. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.283887. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Welcome to the Real World: Do the Conditions of FDA Approval Devalue High-sensitivity Troponin?欢迎来到现实世界:FDA的批准条件是否贬低了高敏肌钙蛋白?
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;24(10):1278-1280. doi: 10.1111/acem.13256. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Effect of Using the HEART Score in Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Trial.在急诊科胸痛患者中使用 HEART 评分的效果:一项阶梯式、集群随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):689-697. doi: 10.7326/M16-1600. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
9
Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction With a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement Below the Limit of Detection: A Collaborative Meta-analysis.单一高敏肌钙蛋白 T 检测低于检测限快速排除急性心肌梗死:一项协作荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):715-724. doi: 10.7326/M16-2562. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
10
Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid: single biomarker re-derivation and external validation in three cohorts.仅肌钙蛋白的曼彻斯特急性冠脉综合征(T-MACS)决策辅助工具:在三个队列中的单一生物标志物重新推导及外部验证
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jun;34(6):349-356. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205983. Epub 2016 Aug 26.