From University Medical Center Utrecht and Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht; University of Twente, Enschede; Medical Center The Hague, The Hague; Vu University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein; Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede; Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum; Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht; Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn; and Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, the Netherlands.
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):689-697. doi: 10.7326/M16-1600. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
The HEART (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and initial Troponin) score is an easy-to-apply instrument to stratify patients with chest pain according to their short-term risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), but its effect on daily practice is unknown.
To measure the effect of use of the HEART score on patient outcomes and use of health care resources.
Stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01756846).
Emergency departments in 9 Dutch hospitals.
Unselected patients with chest pain presenting at emergency departments in 2013 and 2014.
All hospitals started with usual care. Every 6 weeks, 1 hospital was randomly assigned to switch to "HEART care," during which physicians calculated the HEART score to guide patient management.
For safety, a noninferiority margin of a 3.0% absolute increase in MACEs within 6 weeks was set. Other outcomes included use of health care resources, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
A total of 3648 patients were included (1827 receiving usual care and 1821 receiving HEART care). Six-week incidence of MACEs during HEART care was 1.3% lower than during usual care (upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI, 2.1% [within the noninferiority margin of 3.0%]). In low-risk patients, incidence of MACEs was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.2% to 3.3%). No statistically significant differences in early discharge, readmissions, recurrent emergency department visits, outpatient visits, or visits to general practitioners were observed.
Physicians were hesitant to refrain from admission and diagnostic tests in patients classified as low risk by the HEART score.
Using the HEART score during initial assessment of patients with chest pain is safe, but the effect on health care resources is limited, possibly due to nonadherence to management recommendations.
Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
HEART(历史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和初始肌钙蛋白)评分是一种易于应用的工具,可根据短期发生主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的风险对胸痛患者进行分层,但它对日常实践的影响尚不清楚。
测量使用 HEART 评分对患者结局和医疗资源使用的影响。
阶梯式、聚类随机试验。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01756846)。
荷兰 9 家医院的急诊科。
2013 年和 2014 年急诊科就诊的未选择的胸痛患者。
所有医院均采用常规护理。每 6 周,1 家医院随机分配到“HEART 护理”,在此期间医生计算 HEART 评分以指导患者管理。
出于安全性考虑,设定了 6 周内 MACE 增加 3.0%的非劣效性边界。其他结局包括医疗资源使用、生活质量和成本效益。
共纳入 3648 例患者(常规护理 1827 例,HEART 护理 1821 例)。HEART 护理期间 6 周内 MACE 的发生率比常规护理低 1.3%(单侧 95%CI 的上限为 2.1%[在 3.0%的非劣效性边界内])。低危患者 MACE 发生率为 2.0%(95%CI,1.2%至 3.3%)。未观察到早期出院、再入院、急诊再次就诊、门诊就诊或全科医生就诊的统计学显著差异。
医生在根据 HEART 评分将患者分类为低危时不愿拒绝入院和诊断性检查。
在胸痛患者初始评估中使用 HEART 评分是安全的,但对医疗资源的影响有限,这可能是由于不遵守管理建议。
荷兰健康研究与发展组织。