• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估增加欧盟消费品相关伤害数据可用性的机会。

Assessment of the opportunities for increasing the availability of EU data on consumer product-related injuries.

机构信息

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2021 Apr;27(2):172-183. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043677. Epub 2020 May 5.

DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043677
PMID:32371468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8005795/
Abstract

The availability of data on consumer products-related accidents and injuries is of interest to a wide range of stakeholders, such as consumer product safety and injury prevention policymakers, market surveillance authorities, consumer organisations, standardisation organisations, manufacturers and the public. While the amount of information available and potentially of use for product safety is considerable in some European Union (EU) countries, its usability at EU level is difficult due to high fragmentation of the data sources, the diversity of data collection methods and increasing data protection concerns. To satisfy the policy need for more timely information on consumer product-related incidents, apart from injury data that have been historically collected by the public health sector, a number of 'alternative' data sources were assessed as potential sources of interest. This study explores the opportunities for enhancing the availability of data of consumer product-related injuries, arising from selected existing and 'alternative' data sources, widely present in Europe, such as firefighters' and poison centres' records, mortality statistics, consumer complaints, insurance companies' registers, manufacturers' incident registers and online news sources. These data sources, coupled with the use of IT technologies, such as interlinking by remote data access, could fill in the existing information gap. Strengths and weaknesses of selected data sources, with a view to support a common data platform, are evaluated and presented. Conducting the study relied on the literature review, extensive use of the surveys, interviews, workshops with experts and online data-mining pilot study.

摘要

消费品相关事故和伤害数据的可用性引起了广泛利益相关者的关注,例如消费品安全和伤害预防政策制定者、市场监管机构、消费者组织、标准化组织、制造商和公众。虽然一些欧盟(EU)国家有相当数量的信息可用于产品安全,并且具有潜在的可用性,但由于数据源高度分散、数据收集方法多样化以及数据保护问题日益增多,其在欧盟层面上的可用性仍存在困难。为了满足对消费品相关事件更及时信息的政策需求,除了公共卫生部门历来收集的伤害数据外,还评估了一些“替代”数据源,将其作为潜在的感兴趣来源。本研究探讨了从广泛存在于欧洲的现有和“替代”数据源(如消防员和中毒中心记录、死亡率统计、消费者投诉、保险公司登记册、制造商事故登记册和在线新闻来源)中增强消费品相关伤害数据可用性的机会。这些数据源与 IT 技术(如远程数据访问的链接)的结合,可以填补现有信息空白。评估并介绍了选定数据源的优缺点,以支持通用数据平台。进行这项研究依赖于文献综述、广泛使用调查、专家访谈、研讨会以及在线数据挖掘试点研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d032/8005795/2b177c629874/injuryprev-2020-043677f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d032/8005795/2b177c629874/injuryprev-2020-043677f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d032/8005795/2b177c629874/injuryprev-2020-043677f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the opportunities for increasing the availability of EU data on consumer product-related injuries.评估增加欧盟消费品相关伤害数据可用性的机会。
Inj Prev. 2021 Apr;27(2):172-183. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043677. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
[Accidents and injuries in the EU. Results of the EuroSafe Reports].[欧盟的事故与伤害。欧洲安全报告结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2014 Jun;57(6):673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-1969-5.
3
EU alerting and reporting systems for potential chemical public health threats and hazards.欧盟潜在化学公共健康威胁和危害的警报和报告系统。
Environ Int. 2014 Nov;72:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
4
Public funding for research on antibacterial resistance in the JPIAMR countries, the European Commission, and related European Union agencies: a systematic observational analysis.JPIAMR国家、欧盟委员会及相关欧盟机构对抗菌素耐药性研究的公共资金投入:一项系统性观察分析
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;16(4):431-40. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00350-3. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
5
Protecting whose welfare? A document analysis of competition regulatory decisions in four jurisdictions across three harmful consumer product industries.保护谁的福利?对四个司法管辖区三个有害消费品行业的竞争监管决策的文件分析。
Global Health. 2024 Oct 2;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01076-2.
6
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
8
[Plant protection products and their residues : Aspects of consumer safety in context of the new EU regulations].[植物保护产品及其残留:新欧盟法规背景下的消费者安全问题]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):567-76. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1068-1.
9
New legal requirements for submission of product information to poisons centres in EU member states.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018 Jan;56(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1339888. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
Non-European traditional herbal medicines in Europe: a community herbal monograph perspective.欧洲的非欧洲传统草药:从社区草药专论角度看
J Ethnopharmacol. 2014 Oct 28;156:107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic online news monitoring and classification for syndromic surveillance.用于症状监测的自动在线新闻监测与分类
Decis Support Syst. 2009 Nov;47(4):508-517. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.016. Epub 2009 May 4.
2
TOY SAFETY SURVEILLANCE FROM ONLINE REVIEWS.基于在线评论的玩具安全监测
Decis Support Syst. 2016 Oct;90:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 26.
3
Injury surveillance: the next generation.伤害监测:下一代技术
Inj Prev. 2016 Apr;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i63-5. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041943.
4
All Wales Injury Surveillance System revised: development of a population-based system to evaluate single-level and multilevel interventions.全威尔士伤害监测系统修订版:基于人群的系统开发,用于评估单级和多级干预措施。
Inj Prev. 2016 Apr;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-5. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041814. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
5
Trauma registry methodology: a survey of trauma registry custodians to determine current approaches.创伤登记方法:对创伤登记保管人员进行调查以确定当前方法。
Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
6
Open PHACTS: semantic interoperability for drug discovery.Open PHACTS:药物发现的语义互操作性。
Drug Discov Today. 2012 Nov;17(21-22):1188-98. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
7
Classifying external causes of injury: history, current approaches, and future directions.伤害外部原因分类:历史、当前方法和未来方向。
Epidemiol Rev. 2012;34:4-16. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr014. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
Injury data needs and opportunities in Europe.欧洲的伤害数据需求和机会。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2009 Jun;16(2):103-12. doi: 10.1080/17457300902885769.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
10
Assessing the burden of injury in six European countries.评估六个欧洲国家的伤害负担。
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Jan;85(1):27-34. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.030973.