• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国主要苹果品种上苹果绵蚜刺吸行为的比较分析。

Comparative Analysis of Stylet Penetration Behaviors of Eriosoma lanigerum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Main Apple Cultivars in China.

机构信息

College of Botanical Medicine, Qingdao Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Integrated Plant Disease and Pest Control, China-Australia Joint Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Health, Qingdao, China.

Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2020 Aug 13;113(4):1761-1767. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa085.

DOI:10.1093/jee/toaa085
PMID:32372096
Abstract

The preference and behavioral mechanism of the feeding behavior of the woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), on Chinese apple cultivars was investigated using the electrical penetration graph (EPG) technique. Feeding of adult aphids was assessed for the four main cultivars of apple in China (Red Fuji, Ralls Genet, Starkrimson, and Jonagold) over an 8-h monitoring period, what that of fourth-instar nymphs was assessed for 8 h on Jonagold only. EPG waveforms representing the details of probing behaviors, parameters were measured for analysis. We found that at the nonphloem phase, the total duration of the nonpenetration (np) waveform and the total duration of the stylet pathway phase (the 'C wave') on Ralls Genet and Starkrimson were significantly longer than on Red Fuji. In addition, the phloem-feeding phase, the total duration of 'release of saliva into the phloem', (the E1 waveform) was significantly longer on Ralls Genet and Jonagold than on Red Fuji. The total duration of the 'ingestion from sieve cells' phase (the E2 waveform) on Red Fuji, meanwhile, was significantly longer than on Ralls Genet or Starkrimson. At the same time, when combined with EPG parameters, Red Fuji was found to have no obvious resistance to woolly apple aphid and to be a susceptible cultivar. This experiment also recorded the feeding waveform of fourth-instar aphid nymphs. Based on the phloem and nonphloem parameters recorded in this study, it was inferred that adult aphids are more likely than nymphs to feed on apple trees.

摘要

利用电穿透图(EPG)技术研究了苹果绵蚜(Eriosoma lanigerum(Hausmann))对中国苹果品种的取食行为的偏好和行为机制。在 8 小时的监测期内,评估了成年蚜虫对中国四种主要苹果品种(红富士、元帅、斯特克明斯特和乔纳金)的取食情况,仅对 8 小时龄的第四龄若虫在乔纳金上进行了取食评估。EPG 波代表了探测行为的细节,测量了参数进行分析。我们发现,在非韧皮部阶段,非穿透(np)波的总持续时间和口器途径阶段(“C 波”)的总持续时间在元帅和斯特克明斯特上显著长于在红富士上。此外,在韧皮部取食阶段,唾液释放到韧皮部的总持续时间(E1 波)在元帅和乔纳金上显著长于在红富士上。同时,在红富士上,筛细胞取食阶段(E2 波)的总持续时间显著长于在元帅或斯特克明斯特上。同时,结合 EPG 参数,发现红富士对苹果绵蚜没有明显的抗性,是一个易感品种。本实验还记录了第四龄若虫的取食波形。基于本研究记录的韧皮部和非韧皮部参数,可以推断成年蚜虫比若虫更有可能取食苹果树。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Stylet Penetration Behaviors of Eriosoma lanigerum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Main Apple Cultivars in China.中国主要苹果品种上苹果绵蚜刺吸行为的比较分析。
J Econ Entomol. 2020 Aug 13;113(4):1761-1767. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa085.
2
EPG analysis of stylet penetration preference of woolly apple aphid on different parts of apple trees.EPG 分析表明,有卷叶的苹果蚜虫对苹果树不同部位的刺吸有偏好。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 24;16(8):e0256641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256641. eCollection 2021.
3
Chemical characteristics of normal, woolly apple aphid-damaged, and mechanically damaged twigs of six apple cultivars, measured in autumn wood.在秋季木质部中测量的 6 个苹果品种的正常、毛白杨蚜虫损伤和机械损伤嫩枝的化学特性。
J Econ Entomol. 2013 Apr;106(2):1011-7. doi: 10.1603/ec12168.
4
Mouthpart structure in the woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea: Pemphigidae).苹果绵蚜(Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann))(半翅目:蚜总科:瘿蚜科)的口器结构
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2016 May;45(3):230-41. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
5
Probing behavior of Adelges laricis Vallot (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) on Larix decidua Mill: Description and analysis of EPG waveforms.探讨落叶松球蚜 Adelges laricis Vallot(半翅目:球蚜科)在兴安落叶松 Larix decidua Mill 上的取食行为:EPG 波型的描述与分析。
PLoS One. 2021 May 18;16(5):e0251663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251663. eCollection 2021.
6
Feeding behavior analysis of the soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on resistant soybean 'Dowling'.大豆蚜(半翅目:蚜科)在抗大豆‘道林’上的取食行为分析。
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Jun;103(3):648-53. doi: 10.1603/ec09370.
7
Ultrastructure of compatible and incompatible interactions in phloem sieve elements during the stylet penetration by cotton aphids in melon.在棉蚜刺吸瓜类韧皮部筛管过程中亲和和非亲和相互作用的超微结构
Insect Sci. 2018 Aug;25(4):631-642. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12447. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
8
Newly Distinguished Cell Punctures Associated with Transmission of the Semipersistent Phloem-Limited Beet Yellows Virus.新发现的与半持久韧皮部局限型黄化病毒传播有关的细胞穿刺现象。
J Virol. 2018 Oct 12;92(21). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01076-18. Print 2018 Nov 1.
9
[Investigation on the resistance of wheat germplasm resources to aphid based on fuzzy recognition and electrical penetration graph (EPG)techniques].基于模糊识别和刺吸电位图谱(EPG)技术的小麦种质资源对蚜虫抗性的研究
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Oct;31(10):3248-3254. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202010.033.
10
Electrical Penetration Graph Recording of Russian Wheat Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Feeding on Aphid-Resistant Wheat and Barley.俄罗斯小麦蚜(半翅目:蚜科)取食抗蚜小麦和大麦的电穿透图记录
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Oct;108(5):2465-70. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov183. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Different Host Plants Distinctly Influence the Feeding Ability of the Brown Citrus Aphid .不同寄主植物对柑橘褐蚜的取食能力有显著影响。
Insects. 2021 Sep 24;12(10):864. doi: 10.3390/insects12100864.
2
EPG analysis of stylet penetration preference of woolly apple aphid on different parts of apple trees.EPG 分析表明,有卷叶的苹果蚜虫对苹果树不同部位的刺吸有偏好。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 24;16(8):e0256641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256641. eCollection 2021.
3
Expression of Thioredoxin/Thioredoxin Reductase System Genes in Aphid-Challenged Maize Seedlings.
硫氧还蛋白/硫氧还蛋白还原酶系统基因在玉米受蚜虫侵害的幼苗中的表达。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 31;21(17):6296. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176296.