• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知信念研究中个体内与个体间方法的结合

Combining Intra- and Interindividual Approaches in Epistemic Beliefs Research.

作者信息

Rosman Tom, Seifried Eva, Merk Samuel

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID), Trier, Germany.

Institute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 16;11:570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00570. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00570
PMID:32373003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7176995/
Abstract

We combined inter- and intraindividual approaches to investigate university students' biology- and psychology-specific specific epistemic beliefs (beliefs about the nature and structure of knowledge). We expected that university students would perceive the discipline of biology as more absolute and less multiplistic than the discipline of psychology (intraindividual perspective). Furthermore, we expected students from so-called "hard" disciplines to perceive biology as more absolute and less multiplistic than students from soft disciplines (interindividual perspective). Finally, we expected that students from hard disciplines, compared to their peers from soft disciplines, would perceive stronger differences between biology and psychology (combined perspective). Hypotheses were tested, using Bayes factors, in = 938 university students from a multitude of disciplines. Results revealed that university students perceive biology as considerably more absolute and less multiplistic compared to psychology. However, the findings also suggest that there are no strong interindividual differences between students from hard and soft disciplines regarding the perception of biology. Finally, results revealed that students enrolled in harder disciplines perceive a slightly stronger difference between biology and psychology. In sum, intraindividual effects were considerably stronger, which elicits doubt that students from hard disciplines espouse a fundamentally different set of epistemic beliefs than their peers from soft disciplines.

摘要

我们结合个体间和个体内的方法,来研究大学生在生物学和心理学方面特定的认知信念(关于知识的本质和结构的信念)。我们预计,大学生会认为生物学学科比心理学学科更具绝对性且多元性更少(个体内视角)。此外,我们预计来自所谓“硬”学科的学生比来自“软”学科的学生更认为生物学具有绝对性且多元性更少(个体间视角)。最后,我们预计与来自“软”学科的同龄人相比,来自“硬”学科的学生会认为生物学和心理学之间的差异更大(综合视角)。我们使用贝叶斯因子对938名来自众多学科的大学生进行了假设检验。结果显示,与心理学相比,大学生认为生物学具有明显更高的绝对性且多元性更少。然而,研究结果还表明,在对生物学的认知方面,来自“硬”学科和“软”学科的学生之间没有强烈的个体间差异。最后,结果显示,就读于“硬”学科的学生认为生物学和心理学之间的差异略大。总之,个体内效应要强烈得多,这让人怀疑来自“硬”学科的学生与来自“软”学科的同龄人所秉持的认知信念根本不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/3b204482e693/fpsyg-11-00570-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/5a0ef64a82e1/fpsyg-11-00570-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/7defda0dbae0/fpsyg-11-00570-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/5c082dd8171c/fpsyg-11-00570-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/3b204482e693/fpsyg-11-00570-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/5a0ef64a82e1/fpsyg-11-00570-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/7defda0dbae0/fpsyg-11-00570-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/5c082dd8171c/fpsyg-11-00570-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edac/7176995/3b204482e693/fpsyg-11-00570-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Combining Intra- and Interindividual Approaches in Epistemic Beliefs Research.认知信念研究中个体内与个体间方法的结合
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 16;11:570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00570. eCollection 2020.
2
Pre-service teachers' perceived value of general pedagogical knowledge for practice: Relations with epistemic beliefs and source beliefs.职前教师对实践中一般教学知识的感知价值:与认知信念和来源信念的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184971. eCollection 2017.
3
Exploring the relationships between epistemic beliefs about medicine and approaches to learning medicine: a structural equation modeling analysis.探索关于医学的认知信念与医学学习方法之间的关系:一项结构方程模型分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 18;16:181. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0707-0.
4
Epistemic beliefs as predictors of epistemic emotions: Extending a theoretical model.认知信念作为认知情绪的预测因子:理论模型的扩展。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2018 Sep;88(3):410-427. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12191. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Mechanisms of Epistemic Change-Under Which Circumstances Does Diverging Information Support Epistemic Development?认知变化机制——在哪些情况下不同的信息会支持认知发展?
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 22;9:2278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02278. eCollection 2018.
6
Assessing epistemic sophistication by considering domain-specific absolute and multiplicistic beliefs separately.通过分别考虑特定领域的绝对信念和多元信念来评估认知成熟度。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Jun;86(2):204-21. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12098. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Energy Connections and Misconnections across Chemistry and Biology.能源在化学和生物学中的连接和错位。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-08-0169.
8
"Learning Science Is About Facts and Language Learning Is About Being Discursive"-An Empirical Investigation of Students' Disciplinary Beliefs in the Context of Argumentation.“学习科学关乎事实,而语言学习关乎论述”——关于学生在论证背景下学科信念的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 8;8:946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00946. eCollection 2017.
9
Longitudinal Study of Occupational Therapy Students' Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing.职业治疗专业学生关于知识与认知信念的纵向研究
Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Mar-Apr;69(2):6902230010. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2015.015008.
10
Connecting Structure-Property and Structure-Function Relationships across the Disciplines of Chemistry and Biology: Exploring Student Perceptions.连接化学和生物学学科的结构-性质和结构-功能关系:探索学生的认知。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar33. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-01-0004.

引用本文的文献

1
Person- and Situation-Specific Factors in Discounting Science via Scientific Impotence Excuses.通过科学无力借口贬低科学过程中的个人及情境特定因素。
Eur J Psychol. 2021 Nov 30;17(4):288-305. doi: 10.5964/ejop.3735. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Protect ya Grandma! The Effects of Students' Epistemic Beliefs and Prosocial Values on COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions.保护好你的奶奶!学生的认知信念和亲社会价值观对新冠疫苗接种意愿的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:683987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683987. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-service teachers' perceived value of general pedagogical knowledge for practice: Relations with epistemic beliefs and source beliefs.职前教师对实践中一般教学知识的感知价值:与认知信念和来源信念的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184971. eCollection 2017.
2
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications.贝叶斯推断在心理学中的应用。第一部分:理论优势与实际影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):35-57. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3.
3
Assessing epistemic sophistication by considering domain-specific absolute and multiplicistic beliefs separately.
通过分别考虑特定领域的绝对信念和多元信念来评估认知成熟度。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Jun;86(2):204-21. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12098. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
4
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results.贝叶斯推断在不显著结果中的应用。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 29;5:781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781. eCollection 2014.
5
Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.心理学家的伦理原则与行为准则。
Am Psychol. 2002 Dec;57(12):1060-73.
6
Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology.个人认识论中的维度与学科差异
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Oct;25(4):378-405. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1026.