• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估引入电子免疫登记和库存管理系统的增量成本与节省情况:来自坦桑尼亚和赞比亚更好免疫数据倡议的证据

Assessing the incremental costs and savings of introducing electronic immunization registries and stock management systems: evidence from the better immunization data initiative in Tanzania and Zambia.

作者信息

Mvundura Mercy, Di Giorgio Laura, Vodicka Elisabeth, Kindoli Robert, Zulu Chipo

机构信息

Medical Devices and Health Technologies Program, PATH, Seattle, USA.

Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Feb 12;35(Suppl 1):11. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.1.17804. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.1.17804
PMID:32373262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7195915/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Poor data quality and use have been identified as key challenges that negatively impact immunization programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In addition, many LMICs have a shortage of health personnel, and staff available have demanding workloads across several health programs. In order to address these challenges, the Better Immunization Data (BID) Initiative introduced a comprehensive suite of interventions, including an electronic immunization registry aimed at improving the quality, reliability, and use of immunization data in Arusha Region, Tanzania, and Southern Province of Zambia. The objective of this study was to assess the incremental costs of implementing the BID interventions in immunization programs in these two countries.

METHODS

We conducted a micro-costing study to estimate the economic costs of service delivery and logistics for the immunization programs with and without the BID interventions in a sample of health facilities and district program offices in each country. Structured questionnaires were used to interview immunization program staff at baseline and post-intervention to assess annual resource utilization and costs. Cost outcomes were reported as annual cost per facility, cost per district and changes in resource costs due to the BID interventions (i.e., costs associated with health worker time, start-up costs, etc.). Sub-group analyses were conducted by health facility to assess variation in costs by volume served and location (rural versus urban). One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify influential parameters. Costs were reported in 2017 US dollars.

RESULTS

In Tanzania, the average annual reduction in resource costs was estimated at US$10,236 (95% confidence interval: $7,606-$14,123) per health facility, while the average annual reduction in resource costs per district was estimated at $6,542. In Zambia, reductions in resource costs were modest at an estimated annual average of $628 (95% confidence interval: $209-$1,467) per health facility and $236 per district. Resource cost reductions were mainly attributable to reductions in time required for immunization service delivery and reporting. One-way sensitivity analyses identified key cost drivers, all related to reductions in health worker time.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of electronic immunization registries and stock management systems through the BID Initiative was estimated to result in potential time savings in both countries. Health worker time was the area most impacted by the interventions, suggesting that time savings gained could be utilized for patient care. Information generated through this work provides evidence to inform stakeholder decision-making for scale-up of the BID interventions in Tanzania and Zambia and to inform other Low-to-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) interested in similar interventions.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efe/7195915/411091fca5d1/PAMJ-SUPP-35-1-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efe/7195915/411091fca5d1/PAMJ-SUPP-35-1-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efe/7195915/411091fca5d1/PAMJ-SUPP-35-1-11-g001.jpg
摘要

引言

数据质量差及使用不当已被确定为对低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的免疫规划产生负面影响的关键挑战。此外,许多低收入和中等收入国家卫生人员短缺,现有工作人员在多个卫生项目中承担着繁重的工作量。为应对这些挑战,更好免疫数据(BID)倡议引入了一套全面的干预措施,包括一个电子免疫登记系统,旨在提高坦桑尼亚阿鲁沙地区和赞比亚南部省份免疫数据的质量、可靠性及利用率。本研究的目的是评估在这两个国家的免疫规划中实施BID干预措施的增量成本。

方法

我们开展了一项微观成本核算研究,以估计在每个国家的一组卫生设施和地区项目办公室中,有和没有BID干预措施的免疫规划的服务提供和物流的经济成本。使用结构化问卷在基线和干预后对免疫规划工作人员进行访谈,以评估年度资源利用情况和成本。成本结果报告为每个设施的年度成本、每个地区的成本以及由于BID干预措施导致的资源成本变化(即与卫生工作者时间、启动成本等相关的成本)。按卫生设施进行亚组分析,以评估按服务量和地点(农村与城市)划分的成本差异。进行单向敏感性分析以确定有影响的参数。成本以2017年美元报告。

结果

在坦桑尼亚,每个卫生设施的资源成本估计平均每年减少10,236美元(95%置信区间:7,606美元至14,123美元),而每个地区的资源成本估计平均每年减少6,542美元。在赞比亚,资源成本的减少幅度较小,估计每个卫生设施平均每年减少628美元(95%置信区间:209美元至1,467美元),每个地区减少236美元。资源成本的减少主要归因于免疫服务提供和报告所需时间的减少。单向敏感性分析确定了关键成本驱动因素,均与卫生工作者时间的减少有关。

结论

通过BID倡议引入电子免疫登记系统和库存管理系统估计在这两个国家都能节省潜在时间。卫生工作者时间是受干预影响最大的领域,这表明节省的时间可用于患者护理。通过这项工作产生的信息为利益相关者在坦桑尼亚和赞比亚扩大BID干预措施的决策提供了依据,并为对类似干预措施感兴趣的其他低收入和中等收入国家提供了参考。

相似文献

1
Assessing the incremental costs and savings of introducing electronic immunization registries and stock management systems: evidence from the better immunization data initiative in Tanzania and Zambia.评估引入电子免疫登记和库存管理系统的增量成本与节省情况:来自坦桑尼亚和赞比亚更好免疫数据倡议的证据
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Feb 12;35(Suppl 1):11. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.1.17804. eCollection 2020.
2
Estimating the costs of the vaccine supply chain and service delivery for selected districts in Kenya and Tanzania.估算肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚部分地区疫苗供应链及服务交付的成本。
Vaccine. 2015 May 28;33(23):2697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.084. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
3
How much does it cost to get a dose of vaccine to the service delivery location? Empirical evidence from Vietnam's Expanded Program on Immunization.将一剂疫苗送到服务提供地点需要多少成本?来自越南扩大免疫规划的经验证据。
Vaccine. 2014 Feb 7;32(7):834-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.029. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
4
Immunization costs, from evidence to policy: Findings from a nationally representative costing study and policy translation effort in Tanzania.免疫接种成本,从证据到政策:来自坦桑尼亚全国代表性成本研究和政策转化工作的发现。
Vaccine. 2020 Nov 10;38(48):7659-7667. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
5
An evaluation of the cost of human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine delivery in Zambia.赞比亚人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种成本评估。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09222-2.
6
The cost determinants of routine infant immunization services: a meta-regression analysis of six country studies.常规婴儿免疫服务的成本决定因素:六项国家研究的元回归分析
BMC Med. 2017 Oct 6;15(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0942-1.
7
The costs of developing, deploying and maintaining electronic immunisation registries in Tanzania and Zambia.在坦桑尼亚和赞比亚开发、部署和维护电子免疫登记系统的成本。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Nov 25;4(6):e001904. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001904. eCollection 2019.
8
Examining the cost of delivering routine immunization in Honduras.考察洪都拉斯提供常规免疫接种的成本。
Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.016.
9
Added Value of Electronic Immunization Registries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Observational Case Study in Tanzania.电子免疫登记系统在中低收入国家的附加值:坦桑尼亚的观察性案例研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 21;8(1):e32455. doi: 10.2196/32455.
10
Systematic review of the costs and effectiveness of interventions to increase infant vaccination coverage in low- and middle-income countries.系统评价在中低收入国家提高婴儿疫苗接种覆盖率的干预措施的成本和效果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4468-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Costs of Digital Health Interventions to Improve Immunization Data in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Multicountry Mixed Methods Study.改善低收入和中等收入国家免疫接种数据的数字健康干预措施成本:多国混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 18;27:e62746. doi: 10.2196/62746.
2
Strengthening Immunization Data: Protocol for the Evaluation of an Electronic Immunization Register.加强免疫接种数据:电子免疫接种登记册评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 19;14:e65663. doi: 10.2196/65663.
3
Root causes of COVID-19 data backlogs: a mixed methods analysis in four African countries.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Routine Vaccination Coverage, 2016.2016年全球常规疫苗接种覆盖率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Nov 17;66(45):1252-1255. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6645a3.
2
The future of routine immunization in the developing world: challenges and opportunities.发展中国家常规免疫的未来:挑战与机遇。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Dec 10;2(4):381-94. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00137.
3
Economic review of immunization information systems to increase vaccination rates: a community guide systematic review.免疫信息系统的经济学综述以提高疫苗接种率:社区指南系统评价
新冠疫情数据积压的根本原因:对四个非洲国家的混合方法分析
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024 May 6;2(Suppl 1):i16-i28. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae009. eCollection 2024.
4
Outcomes and Costs of the Transition From a Paper-Based Immunization System to a Digital Immunization System in Vietnam: Mixed Methods Study.从纸质免疫系统向越南数字化免疫系统过渡的结果和成本:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 18;26:e45070. doi: 10.2196/45070.
5
Leveraging Community Health Workers and a Responsive Digital Health System to Improve Vaccination Coverage and Timeliness in Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Study.利用社区卫生工作者和响应式数字卫生系统提高资源有限环境下的疫苗接种覆盖率和及时性:一项整群随机1型有效性-实施混合研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jan 12;13:e52523. doi: 10.2196/52523.
6
Design, Development, and Deployment of an Electronic Immunization Registry: Experiences From Vietnam, Tanzania, and Zambia.电子免疫登记系统的设计、开发和部署:来自越南、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚的经验。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Feb 28;11(1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00804.
7
Changes in on-time vaccination following the introduction of an electronic immunization registry, Tanzania 2016-2018: interrupted time-series analysis.2016-2018 年坦桑尼亚引入电子免疫登记系统后及时接种疫苗的变化:中断时间序列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):1175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08504-2.
8
Added Value of Electronic Immunization Registries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Observational Case Study in Tanzania.电子免疫登记系统在中低收入国家的附加值:坦桑尼亚的观察性案例研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 21;8(1):e32455. doi: 10.2196/32455.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):253-62. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000100.
4
Strengthening the expanded programme on immunization in Africa: looking beyond 2015.加强非洲扩大免疫规划:展望 2015 年之后。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001405. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
5
Priorities for research into human resources for health in low- and middle-income countries.低、中收入国家卫生人力资源研究重点。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):435-43. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.066290.
6
Microcosting quantity data collection methods.微观成本核算数量数据收集方法。
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S76-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819bc064.
7
Accuracy and quality of immunization information systems in forty-one low income countries.41个低收入国家免疫规划信息系统的准确性和质量
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Jan;14(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02181.x.
8
An evaluation of infant immunization in Africa: is a transformation in progress?非洲婴幼儿免疫接种评估:变革正在进行吗?
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Jun;85(6):449-57. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.031526.
9
Economics of immunization information systems in the United States: assessing costs and efficiency.美国免疫信息系统的经济学:评估成本与效率
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006 Aug 22;4:15. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-4-15.
10
The immunization data quality audit: verifying the quality and consistency of immunization monitoring systems.免疫接种数据质量审计:核实免疫接种监测系统的质量与一致性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jul;83(7):503-10.