Pandit Narendra, Yadav Tek Narayan, Awale Laligen, Deo Kunal Bikram, Dhakal Yogesh, Adhikary Shailesh
Surgical Gastroenterology Division, Department of Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.
Minim Invasive Surg. 2020 Apr 21;2020:4382307. doi: 10.1155/2020/4382307. eCollection 2020.
With the adoption of safe cholecystectomy principles at an academic institute, the risk of major bile duct injury has decreased. This study aims at evaluating the present status of bile duct injury, compared to the study published in 2013 by index centre.
This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of bile leak and bile duct injury from 2014 to 2019. Patients who completed postcholecystectomy bile leak or bile duct injury treatment and were on regular follow-up were included.
Eighteen patients (0.78%) among 2,300 consecutive cholecystectomies presented with bile duct injury, including 8 (0.35%) major bile duct injuries and 10 (0.43%) bile leaks compared to major bile duct injury rate of 0.68% (92/11,345 cholecystectomies) between 2001 and 2010. Injuries were classified as Strasberg's type A (52.9%), type D (5.9%), and type E (41.1%). Eight patients (47%) of bile leak were managed conservatively with drains, while two required laparotomy and lavage. The mean time for spontaneous closure of bile leak was 11 days. Intraoperative repair was done in three cases: Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy in 2 and end-to-end repair over T-tube in 1 for sharp transection of the duct. Delayed repair (Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy) was done in five patients. The median postcholecystectomy hospital stay was 8 days, with no mortality. There was no restricture at a median follow-up of 13 months.
With the adoption of a safe culture of cholecystectomy, the major bile duct injury rate has decreased currently. Repair of bile duct injury by experienced hepatobiliary surgeon results in excellent outcome.
随着一所学术机构采用安全胆囊切除术原则,主要胆管损伤的风险有所降低。本研究旨在评估胆管损伤的现状,并与索引中心2013年发表的研究进行比较。
这是一项对2014年至2019年前瞻性维护的胆漏和胆管损伤数据库的回顾性研究。纳入完成胆囊切除术后胆漏或胆管损伤治疗并接受定期随访的患者。
在2300例连续胆囊切除术中,18例(0.78%)出现胆管损伤,其中8例(0.35%)为主要胆管损伤,10例(0.43%)为胆漏,而2001年至2010年间主要胆管损伤率为0.68%(92/11345例胆囊切除术)。损伤分为斯特拉斯伯格A型(52.9%)、D型(5.9%)和E型(41.1%)。8例(47%)胆漏患者通过放置引流管保守治疗,2例需要剖腹手术和灌洗。胆漏自发闭合的平均时间为11天。3例患者进行了术中修复:其中2例行Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术,1例因胆管锐性横断行T管支撑下的端端吻合术。5例患者进行了延迟修复(Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术)。胆囊切除术后的中位住院时间为8天,无死亡病例。中位随访期13个月时无狭窄发生。
随着安全胆囊切除文化的采用,目前主要胆管损伤率有所下降。由经验丰富的肝胆外科医生进行胆管损伤修复可取得良好效果。