Głuszek Stanisław, Kot Marta, Bałchanowski Norbert, Matykiewicz Jarosław, Kuchinka Jakub, Kozieł Dorota, Wawrzycka Iwona
Pol Przegl Chir. 2014 Jan;86(1):17-25. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0004.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in surgical wards. Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) incurred during the procedures are among postoperative complications that are most difficult to treat. The risk of bile duct injury is 0.2-0.4%, and their consequences are unpleasant both for the surgeon and for the patient. The aim of the study was analysis of iatrogenic bile duct injuries and methods of their repair, taking into consideration the circumstances, under which the injuries occur.
The study group consisted of 16 patients who had suffered IBDI during surgery. The analysed parameters included sex, age, indications for surgery, the setting of the surgical procedure and the type of bile duct injury. Additionally, the time of injury diagnosis, type of repair and treatment outcome were assessed. The IBDI analysis used the EAES classification of injuries. The time of IBDI repair was defined as immediate, early or late,depending on the time that had passed from the injury. The analysis included complications seen after bile duct repair.
The study group consisted of 10 women and 6 men, aged 29-84. Patients underwent 6 classic cholecystectomies, 8 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, one gastrotomy to remove oesophageal prosthesis and one laparotomy due to peptic ulcer. IBDI was diagnosed intraoperatively in 4 patients. In 12 patients IBDI was diagnosed within 1-7 days. The diagnosis was based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and the results of biochemistry tests. According to the EAES classification, the injuries were of type 1 (4 patients), type 2 (8 patients), type 5 (3 patients) and type 6 (1 patients). Reconstruction procedures were performed during the same anaesthesia session in 3 patients, and in the early period in 13 patients. The main procedure was Roux-en-Y anastomosis (12 patients), with the remaining including bile-duct suturing over a T-tube (3 patients) and underpinning of an accessory bile duct in the pocket left after gallbladder removal (1 patient). The most common reconstruction complications included bile leak (3 patients), recurrent cholangitis (3 patients) and bile duct stricture (2 patients). Mortality in the study group was 12.5%.
The procedures of laparoscopic and classic cholecystectomy are associated with a risk of IBDI, especially in the presence of inflammatory state of the gall-bladder. IBDI is a complex complication: its treatment poses a challenge for the operating surgeon, and even the most careful treatment adversely affects the patient's lifedue to complications.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术是外科病房中最常施行的外科手术之一。手术过程中发生的医源性胆管损伤(IBDI)是最难治疗的术后并发症之一。胆管损伤的风险为0.2 - 0.4%,其后果对外科医生和患者来说都很棘手。本研究的目的是分析医源性胆管损伤及其修复方法,同时考虑损伤发生的情况。
研究组由16例手术中发生医源性胆管损伤的患者组成。分析的参数包括性别、年龄、手术指征、手术环境及胆管损伤类型。此外,还评估了损伤诊断时间、修复类型及治疗结果。医源性胆管损伤分析采用EAES损伤分类法。医源性胆管损伤修复时间根据损伤后经过的时间定义为即刻、早期或晚期。分析包括胆管修复后出现的并发症。
研究组包括10名女性和6名男性,年龄在29 - 84岁之间。患者接受了6例经典胆囊切除术、8例腹腔镜胆囊切除术、1例胃切开术以取出食管假体以及1例因消化性溃疡行剖腹手术。4例患者术中诊断出医源性胆管损伤。12例患者在1 - 7天内诊断出医源性胆管损伤。诊断基于内镜逆行胰胆管造影及生化检查结果。根据EAES分类,损伤类型为1型(4例)、2型(8例)、5型(3例)和6型(1例)。3例患者在同一次麻醉期间进行了重建手术,13例患者在早期进行了重建手术。主要手术方式为Roux - en - Y吻合术(12例),其余包括在T管上缝合胆管(3例)以及在胆囊切除后残留的囊袋中对副胆管进行支撑(1例)。最常见的重建并发症包括胆漏(3例)、复发性胆管炎(3例)和胆管狭窄(2例)。研究组的死亡率为12.5%。
腹腔镜和经典胆囊切除手术都存在医源性胆管损伤风险,尤其是在胆囊存在炎症状态时。医源性胆管损伤是一种复杂的并发症:其治疗对外科医生构成挑战,而且即使是最精心的治疗也会因并发症对患者的生活产生不利影响。