• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯尼亚内罗毕贫民窟环境中,合并队列方程和弗雷明汉风险评分在心血管疾病风险分类中的比较表现。

Comparative performance of pooled cohort equations and Framingham risk scores in cardiovascular disease risk classification in a slum setting in Nairobi Kenya.

作者信息

Wekesah Frederick M, Mutua Martin K, Boateng Daniel, Grobbee Diederick E, Asiki Gershim, Kyobutungi Catherine K, Klipstein-Grobusch Kerstin

机构信息

African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.

Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Apr 28;28:100521. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100521. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100521
PMID:32373711
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7191575/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) cause 18 million deaths annually. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) account for 80% of the CVD burden, and the burden is expected to grow in the region in the coming years. Screening for and identification of individuals at high risk for CVD in primary care settings can be accomplished using available CVD risk scores. However, few of these scores have been validated/recalibrated for use in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

METHODS

Pooled cohort equations (PCE) and Framingham risk scores for 10-year CVD risk were applied on 1960 men and women aged 40 years and older from the AWI-Gen (Africa, Wits-INDEPTH Partnership for GENomic studies) study 2015. Low, moderate/intermediate or high CVD risk classifications correspond to <10%, 10-20% and >20% chance of developing CVD in 10 years respectively. Agreement between the risk scores was assessed using kappa and correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

High CVD risk was 10.3% in PCE 2013, 0.4% in PCE 2018, 2.9% in Framingham and 3.6% in Framingham non-laboratory scores. Conversely, low CVD risk was 62.2% in PCE 2013 and 95.6% in PCE 2018, 84.0% and 80.1% in Framingham and Framingham non-laboratory scores, respectively. A moderate agreement existed between the Framingham functions (kappa = 0.64, 95% CI 0.59-0.68, correlation, r = 0.711). There was no agreement between the PCE 2013 and 2018 functions (kappa = 0.05, 95% CI 0.04-0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Newer cohort-based data is necessary to validate and recalibrate existing CVD risk scores in order to develop appropriate functions for use in SSA.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病(CVD)每年导致1800万人死亡。低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)承担了80%的心血管疾病负担,预计未来几年该地区的负担还将增加。在初级保健机构中,使用现有的心血管疾病风险评分可以筛查和识别心血管疾病高危个体。然而,这些评分中很少有经过验证/重新校准可用于撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)地区的。

方法

对2015年AWI-Gen(非洲,威特沃特斯兰德大学深度基因组研究合作伙伴关系)研究中1960名40岁及以上的男性和女性应用了10年心血管疾病风险的合并队列方程(PCE)和弗雷明汉风险评分。低、中/中等或高心血管疾病风险分类分别对应10年内发生心血管疾病的概率<10%、10 - 20%和>20%。使用kappa系数和相关系数评估风险评分之间的一致性。

结果

2013年PCE中高心血管疾病风险为10.3%,2018年PCE中为0.4%,弗雷明汉评分中为2.9%,弗雷明汉非实验室评分中为3.6%。相反,2013年PCE中低心血管疾病风险为62.2%,2018年PCE中为95.6%,弗雷明汉评分和弗雷明汉非实验室评分中分别为84.0%和80.1%。弗雷明汉函数之间存在中等程度的一致性(kappa = 0.64,95%CI 0.59 - 0.68,相关性,r = 0.711)。2013年和2018年PCE函数之间不存在一致性(kappa = 0.05,95%CI 0.04 - 0.06)。

结论

需要更新的基于队列的数据来验证和重新校准现有的心血管疾病风险评分,以便开发适用于撒哈拉以南非洲地区的函数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c3c/7191575/7ebfafad3233/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c3c/7191575/7ebfafad3233/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c3c/7191575/7ebfafad3233/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative performance of pooled cohort equations and Framingham risk scores in cardiovascular disease risk classification in a slum setting in Nairobi Kenya.肯尼亚内罗毕贫民窟环境中,合并队列方程和弗雷明汉风险评分在心血管疾病风险分类中的比较表现。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Apr 28;28:100521. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100521. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction in sub-Saharan African populations - Comparative analysis of risk algorithms in the RODAM study.撒哈拉以南非洲人群的心血管疾病风险预测 - RODAM 研究中风险算法的比较分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;254:310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.082. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
3
Estimating the burden of cardiovascular risk in community dwellers over 40 years old in South Africa, Kenya, Burkina Faso and Ghana.估算南非、肯尼亚、布基纳法索和加纳40岁以上社区居民的心血管疾病风险负担。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003499.
4
Validation of the Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Score and Pooled Cohort Equations in a Community-Based Population: A Prospective Cohort Study Analysis 2006-2017.基于社区人群的弗雷明汉心血管疾病综合风险评分和合并队列方程的验证:一项2006 - 2017年的前瞻性队列研究分析
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Nov;39(6):879-887. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202311_39(6).20230405A.
5
Comparative assessment of absolute cardiovascular disease risk characterization from non-laboratory-based risk assessment in South African populations.南非人群中非实验室基础风险评估对心血管疾病绝对风险特征的比较评估。
BMC Med. 2013 Jul 24;11:170. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-170.
6
External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.在阿联酋人群中对三种常用心血管风险预测评分进行外部验证和临床实用性评估:一项回顾性纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e040680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680.
7
Comparing six cardiovascular risk prediction models in Haiti: implications for identifying high-risk individuals for primary prevention.比较海地的六个心血管风险预测模型:对确定初级预防高危个体的意义。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 19;22(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12963-x.
8
External validation and comparison of four cardiovascular risk prediction models with data from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study.澳大利亚糖尿病、肥胖和生活方式研究的数据对四种心血管风险预测模型的外部验证和比较。
Med J Aust. 2019 Mar;210(4):161-167. doi: 10.5694/mja2.12061. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
Temporal trends in cardiovascular risk factors and performance of the Framingham Risk Score and the Pooled Cohort Equations.心血管危险因素的时间趋势及 Framingham 风险评分和 Pooled Cohort 方程的表现。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jan;73(1):19-25. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211102. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Evaluating cardiovascular disease risk stratification using multiple-polygenic risk scores and pooled cohort equations: insights from a 17-year longitudinal Korean cohort study.使用多基因风险评分和汇总队列方程评估心血管疾病风险分层:一项为期17年的韩国纵向队列研究的见解。
Front Genet. 2024 Mar 28;15:1364993. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1364993. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Agreement between Framingham, Pooled Cohort Equations, and Globorisk-LAC in the Estimation of Cardiovascular Risk in Brazil, 2013.2013年巴西弗明汉姆方程、合并队列方程与Globorisk-LAC在心血管风险评估中的一致性
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Jul 28;122(6):e20240405. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240405. eCollection 2025.
2
Performance of PREVENT and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-Year ASCVD risk in the UK Biobank.PREVENT及汇总队列方程在英国生物银行中预测10年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的性能。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025 May 18;22:101009. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101009. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Harnessing HIV clinics to deliver integrated hypertension care for People living with HIV in Uganda: A formative mixed methods study.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of Mortality from Cardiovascular Disease in the Slums of Nairobi, Kenya.肯尼亚内罗毕贫民窟心血管疾病死亡率的决定因素。
Glob Heart. 2020 Apr 10;15(1):33. doi: 10.5334/gh.787.
2
Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.弗拉明汉风险模型和队列汇总方程预测心血管疾病 10 年风险的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2019 Jun 13;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1340-7.
3
Global, Regional, National, and Subnational Big Data to Inform Health Equity Research: Perspectives from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
利用艾滋病诊所为乌干达的艾滋病病毒感染者提供综合高血压护理:一项形成性混合方法研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;5(6):e0004701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004701. eCollection 2025.
4
Discrimination and calibration performances of non-laboratory-based and laboratory-based cardiovascular risk predictions: a systematic review.基于非实验室和基于实验室的心血管风险预测的辨别和校准性能:一项系统评价。
Open Heart. 2025 Feb 10;12(1):e003147. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003147.
5
No Evidence for an Association of HIV and Antiviral Treatment With Changes in Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score in the Ndlovu Cohort Study.没有证据表明 HIV 和抗病毒治疗与 Ndlovu 队列研究中弗雷明汉心血管风险评分的变化有关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;13(2):e029637. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029637. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
6
Genotype-by-socioeconomic status interaction influences heart disease risk scores and carotid artery thickness in Mexican Americans: the predominant role of education in comparison to household income and socioeconomic index.基因类型与社会经济地位的相互作用影响墨西哥裔美国人的心脏病风险评分和颈动脉厚度:与家庭收入和社会经济指数相比,教育起主要作用。
Front Genet. 2023 Sep 14;14:1132110. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1132110. eCollection 2023.
7
External validation of the ACC/AHA ASCVD risk score in a Colombian population cohort.在哥伦比亚人群队列中对 ACC/AHA ASCVD 风险评分进行外部验证。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 15;13(1):6139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32668-4.
8
Sex-Specific Survival Bias and Interaction Modeling in Coronary Artery Disease Risk Prediction.性别特异性生存偏差与冠状动脉疾病风险预测中的交互作用建模。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2023 Feb;16(1):e003542. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003542. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Comparison of laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based WHO cardiovascular disease risk charts: a population-based study.基于实验室和非实验室的世界卫生组织心血管疾病风险图表比较:一项基于人群的研究。
J Transl Med. 2022 Mar 16;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03336-4.
10
Comparative performance of the two pooled cohort equations for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.两种列线图方程预测动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的比较性能。
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Oct;334:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.08.034. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
全球、区域、国家和次国家大数据在健康公平研究中的应用:来自 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的观点。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):159-172. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.159. eCollection 2019.
4
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction in low income settings: A call for context specific risk equations.低收入环境下的心血管疾病风险预测:呼吁采用因地制宜的风险方程。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;265:239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.010.
5
Evaluation of the Framingham risk score and pooled cohort risk equation for prediction of cardiovascular risk in low resource areas: Insights from Asian rural population.评估弗明汉风险评分和合并队列风险方程在资源匮乏地区预测心血管风险的应用:来自亚洲农村人口的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;265:237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.063.
6
Clinical Implications of Revised Pooled Cohort Equations for Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk.修订后的汇总队列方程在估计动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险中的临床意义。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):20-29. doi: 10.7326/M17-3011. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction in sub-Saharan African populations - Comparative analysis of risk algorithms in the RODAM study.撒哈拉以南非洲人群的心血管疾病风险预测 - RODAM 研究中风险算法的比较分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;254:310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.082. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
8
Comparisons of the Framingham and Pooled Cohort Equation Risk Scores for Detecting Subclinical Vascular Disease in Blacks Versus Whites.弗雷明汉风险评分与合并队列方程风险评分在检测黑人和白人亚临床血管疾病方面的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;121(5):564-569. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.031. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
Calibration of the Pooled Cohort Equations for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: An Update.动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病 pooled 队列方程的校准:更新。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Dec 6;165(11):786-794. doi: 10.7326/M16-1739. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
10
African partnerships through the H3Africa Consortium bring a genomic dimension to longitudinal population studies on the continent.通过“非洲人类遗传与健康”(H3Africa)联盟建立的非洲伙伴关系,为该大陆的纵向人群研究引入了基因组层面的内容。
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):305-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv187. Epub 2015 Dec 10.