Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e040680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models are useful tools for identifying those at high risk of cardiovascular events in a population. No studies have evaluated the performance of such risk models in an Arab population. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and clinical usefulness of two commonly used Framingham-based risk models and the 2013 Pooled Cohort Risk Equation (PCE) were assessed in a United Arab Emirates (UAE) national population.
A 10-year retrospective cohort study.
Outpatient clinics at a tertiary care hospital, Al-Ain, UAE.
The study cohort included 1041 UAE nationals aged 30-79 who had no history of CVD at baseline. Patients were followed until 31 December 2019. Eligible patients were grouped into the PCE and the Framingham validation cohorts.
The 10-year predicted risk for CVD for each patient was calculated using the 2008 Framingham risk model, the 2008 office-based Framingham risk model, and the 2013 PCE model.
The discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of the three models for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk were assessed.
In women, the 2013 PCE model showed marginally better discrimination (C-statistic: 0.77) than the 2008 Framingham models (C-statistic: 0.74-0.75), whereas all three models showed moderate discrimination in men (C-statistic: 0.69‒0.70). All three models overestimated CVD risk in both men and women, with higher levels of predicted risk. The 2008 Framingham risk model (high-risk threshold of 20%) classified only 46% of women who subsequently developed incident CVD within 10 years as high risk. The 2013 PCE risk model (high-risk threshold of 7.5%) classified 74% of men who did not develop a cardiovascular event as high risk.
None of the three models is accurate for predicting cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals. The performance of the models could potentially be improved by recalibration.
心血管疾病(CVD)风险预测模型是识别人群中心血管事件高危人群的有用工具。尚无研究评估此类风险模型在阿拉伯人群中的表现。因此,在这项研究中,评估了两种常用的基于 Framingham 的风险模型和 2013 年 pooled Cohort Risk Equation(PCE)在阿联酋全国人群中的准确性和临床实用性。
一项回顾性的 10 年队列研究。
阿联酋艾因的一家三级保健医院的门诊诊所。
研究队列包括 1041 名年龄在 30-79 岁、基线时无 CVD 病史的阿联酋国民。患者随访至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。符合条件的患者被分为 PCE 和 Framingham 验证队列。
使用 2008 年 Framingham 风险模型、2008 年基于办公室的 Framingham 风险模型和 2013 年 PCE 模型计算每位患者的 10 年 CVD 风险预测值。
评估三种模型预测 10 年心血管风险的区分度、校准度和临床实用性。
在女性中,2013 年 PCE 模型的区分度略优于 2008 年 Framingham 模型(C 统计量:0.77 比 0.74-0.75),而在男性中,所有三种模型的区分度均为中等(C 统计量:0.69-0.70)。在男性和女性中,所有三种模型均高估了 CVD 风险,预测风险水平较高。2008 年 Framingham 风险模型(高危阈值为 20%)仅将随后在 10 年内发生 CVD 事件的 46%的女性归类为高危人群。2013 年 PCE 风险模型(高危阈值为 7.5%)将未发生心血管事件的 74%的男性归类为高危人群。
三种模型均不能准确预测阿联酋国民的心血管风险。通过重新校准,模型的性能可能会得到改善。