• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较海地的六个心血管风险预测模型:对确定初级预防高危个体的意义。

Comparing six cardiovascular risk prediction models in Haiti: implications for identifying high-risk individuals for primary prevention.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Center for Global Health, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 19;22(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12963-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-12963-x
PMID:35305599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8933947/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are rapidly increasing in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Accurate risk assessment is essential to reduce premature CVD by targeting primary prevention and risk factor treatment among high-risk groups. Available CVD risk prediction models are built on predominantly Caucasian risk profiles from high-income country populations, and have not been evaluated in LMIC populations. We aimed to compare six existing models for predicted 10-year risk of CVD and identify high-risk groups for targeted prevention and treatment in Haiti.

METHODS

We used cross-sectional data within the Haiti CVD Cohort Study, including 1345 adults ≥ 40 years without known history of CVD and with complete data. Six CVD risk prediction models were compared: pooled cohort equations (PCE), adjusted PCE with updated cohorts, Framingham CVD Lipids, Framingham CVD Body Mass Index (BMI), WHO Lipids, and WHO BMI. Risk factors were measured during clinical exams. Primary outcome was continuous and categorical predicted 10-year CVD risk. Secondary outcome was statin eligibility.

RESULTS

Sixty percent were female, 66.8% lived on a daily income of ≤ 1 USD, 52.9% had hypertension, 14.9% had hypercholesterolemia, 7.8% had diabetes mellitus, 4.0% were current smokers, and 2.5% had HIV. Predicted 10-year CVD risk ranged from 3.6% in adjusted PCE (IQR 1.7-8.2) to 9.6% in Framingham-BMI (IQR 4.9-18.0), and Spearman rank correlation coefficients ranged from 0.86 to 0.98. The percent of the cohort categorized as high risk using model specific thresholds ranged from 1.8% using the WHO-BMI model to 41.4% in the PCE model (χ = 1416, p value < 0.001). Statin eligibility also varied widely.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Haiti CVD Cohort, there was substantial variation in the proportion identified as high-risk and statin eligible using existing models, leading to very different treatment recommendations and public health implications depending on which prediction model is chosen. There is a need to design and validate CVD risk prediction tools for low-middle income countries that include locally relevant risk factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT03892265 .

摘要

背景

心血管疾病(CVD)在中低收入国家(LMICs)迅速增加。通过针对高危人群进行一级预防和危险因素治疗,准确的风险评估对于降低CVD 的过早发生至关重要。现有的 CVD 风险预测模型是基于高收入国家人群的主要是白种人风险概况建立的,尚未在 LMIC 人群中进行评估。我们旨在比较六种现有的 CVD 风险预测模型,以预测 10 年 CVD 风险,并确定海地高危人群,以进行有针对性的预防和治疗。

方法

我们使用了海地 CVD 队列研究中的横断面数据,包括 1345 名年龄≥40 岁、无已知 CVD 病史且资料完整的成年人。比较了六种 CVD 风险预测模型:合并队列方程(PCE)、更新队列调整后的 PCE、Framingham CVD 血脂、Framingham CVD 体重指数(BMI)、世界卫生组织(WHO)血脂和 WHO BMI。在临床检查期间测量了风险因素。主要结局是连续的和分类的 10 年 CVD 风险。次要结局是他汀类药物的适用性。

结果

60%为女性,66.8%的人每天收入≤1 美元,52.9%患有高血压,14.9%患有高胆固醇血症,7.8%患有糖尿病,4.0%为当前吸烟者,2.5%为 HIV 阳性。预测的 10 年 CVD 风险范围从调整后的 PCE 中的 3.6%(IQR 1.7-8.2)到 Framingham-BMI 中的 9.6%(IQR 4.9-18.0),Spearman 秩相关系数范围从 0.86 到 0.98。使用特定模型的阈值将队列分类为高危的比例范围从使用 WHO-BMI 模型的 1.8%到 PCE 模型的 41.4%(χ²=1416,p 值<0.001)。他汀类药物的适用性也有很大差异。

结论

在海地 CVD 队列中,使用现有的模型确定为高危和他汀类药物适用的比例存在很大差异,这导致根据所选择的预测模型,治疗建议和公共卫生影响也有很大差异。需要为中低收入国家设计和验证 CVD 风险预测工具,其中包括当地相关的风险因素。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov NCT03892265 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42de/8933947/45bdd955890d/12889_2022_12963_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42de/8933947/45bdd955890d/12889_2022_12963_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42de/8933947/45bdd955890d/12889_2022_12963_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing six cardiovascular risk prediction models in Haiti: implications for identifying high-risk individuals for primary prevention.比较海地的六个心血管风险预测模型:对确定初级预防高危个体的意义。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 19;22(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12963-x.
2
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.减少或无麸质饮食对心血管疾病一级预防的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2.
3
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries.中低收入国家心血管疾病一级预防的多重危险因素干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD011163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011163.pub2.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.基于手机的干预措施,用于提高成年人心血管疾病一级预防中所开药物的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 22;6(6):CD012675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012675.pub2.
8
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的饮食预防高血压(DASH)方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD013729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013729.pub2.
9
Smoking cessation for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.戒烟对心血管疾病二级预防的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 8;8(8):CD014936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014936.pub2.
10
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimates in the US CKD Population Using the PREVENT Equation.使用PREVENT方程对美国慢性肾脏病患者群体进行心血管疾病风险评估。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.01.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis Using Various Models on the Effect of Metabolic Surgery on Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the Chinese Population with Obesity.使用多种模型分析代谢手术对中国肥胖人群心血管疾病风险的影响
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Jun 17;17:2457-2468. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S436176. eCollection 2024.
2
Validation of the general Framingham Risk Score (FRS), SCORE2, revised PCE and WHO CVD risk scores in an Asian population.在亚洲人群中验证一般弗明汉姆风险评分(FRS)、SCORE2、修订的PCE和世界卫生组织心血管疾病风险评分。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Mar 17;35:100742. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100742. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
High Lead Exposure Associated With Higher Blood Pressure in Haiti: a Warning Sign for Low-Income Countries.高铅暴露与海地高血压有关:对低收入国家的警告信号。
Hypertension. 2022 Jan;79(1):283-290. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18250. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Availability and affordability of medicines and cardiovascular outcomes in 21 high-income, middle-income and low-income countries.21 个高收入、中等收入和低收入国家的药品可及性和可负担性与心血管结局的关系。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002640.
3
The Haiti cardiovascular disease cohort: study protocol for a population-based longitudinal cohort.
海地心血管疾病队列研究:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 1;20(1):1633. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09734-x.
4
Access to Cardiovascular Disease and Hypertension Medicines in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Essential Medicine Lists, Price, Availability, and Affordability.发展中国家心血管疾病和高血压药物的可及性:基本药物清单、价格、可获得性及可负担性分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e015302. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015302. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
5
What Is the Best Mix of Population-Wide and High-Risk Targeted Strategies of Primary Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention?原发性中风和心血管疾病预防的全人群策略与高危人群针对性策略的最佳组合是什么?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 4;9(3):e014494. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014494. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
6
World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions.世界卫生组织心血管疾病风险图表:修订后的模型可估算 21 个全球区域的风险。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Oct;7(10):e1332-e1345. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30318-3. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
7
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2018 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心血管血管造影和介入学会/美国预防、物理治疗和康复医师学会/美国糖尿病协会/美国老年学会/美国药学会/美国医师协会/美国生理学会/北美介入放射学会/美国国家脂质协会/美国临床内分泌医师协会胆固醇管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告。
Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-e1143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
8
Machine Learning Outperforms ACC / AHA CVD Risk Calculator in MESA.机器学习在 MESA 研究中优于 ACC/AHA CVD 风险计算器。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 20;7(22):e009476. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009476.
9
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家 84 种行为、环境、职业和代谢风险以及 195 个国家和地区 1990 至 2017 年风险簇的比较风险评估:全球疾病负担研究 2017 系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1923-1994. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家按年龄、性别和死因分类的死亡率,195 个国家和地区,1980-2017 年:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1736-1788. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.