Suppr超能文献

物理治疗专业学生使用基于团队学习的学生评估工具对大体解剖学中基于团队学习的看法。

Physical therapy students' perceptions of team-based learning in gross anatomy using the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument.

作者信息

Livingston Beven, Lundy Mary, Harrington Shana

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Applied Movement Sciences, The University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014 Jan 18;11:1. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess physical therapy student perceptions of team-based learning (TBL) in a graduate level gross anatomy course using the TBL Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI).

METHODS

The TBL-SAI was administered to 85 doctor of physical therapy (DPT) students, comprising three cohorts (classes of 2013, 2014, and 2015), who successfully completed a gross anatomy course where TBL was implemented. The TBL-SAI surveys 33 items, each rated from one (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree) and measures three subscales: students' perceptions of accountability, preference for lecture or TBL, and student satisfaction.

RESULTS

The means for each subscale and the total TBL-SAI score for each cohort fell above the neutral score. The 2015 group (mean, 37.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 35.67 to 40.26) reported significantly higher satisfaction than that of the 2013 group (mean, 32.71; 95% CI, 30.31 to 35.05) and the 2014 group (mean, 33.11; 95% CI, 30.69 to 35.53). The 2015 group (mean, 125.3; 95% CI, 120.6 to 130.3) also had a significantly higher total score than that of the 2013 group (mean, 115.6; 95% CI, 110.5 to 120.5).

CONCLUSION

The physical therapy students reported an overall positive experience in using TBL to learn gross anatomy in terms of accountability, preference for learning mode, and satisfaction. This positive experience with TBL was accompanied by their successful academic performance. Given the traits and learning preferences in this generation of graduate students, TBL could be a teaching method that is received positively elsewhere and results in successful academic performance and learning.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是使用基于团队学习的学生评估工具(TBL-SAI),评估物理治疗专业研究生在大体解剖学课程中对基于团队学习(TBL)的看法。

方法

TBL-SAI被应用于85名物理治疗博士(DPT)学生,他们来自三个队列(2013级、2014级和2015级),这些学生成功完成了实施TBL的大体解剖学课程。TBL-SAI调查33个项目,每个项目的评分从1(强烈不同意)到5(强烈同意),并测量三个子量表:学生对责任感的看法、对讲座或TBL的偏好以及学生满意度。

结果

每个队列的每个子量表的平均分以及TBL-SAI总分均高于中性分数。2015组(平均分37.97;95%置信区间[CI],35.67至40.26)报告的满意度显著高于2013组(平均分32.71;95%CI,30.31至35.05)和2014组(平均分33.11;95%CI,30.69至35.53)。2015组(平均分125.3;95%CI,120.6至130.3)的总分也显著高于2013组(平均分115.6;95%CI,110.5至120.5)。

结论

物理治疗专业学生在使用TBL学习大体解剖学方面,在责任感、学习模式偏好和满意度方面总体上有积极的体验。这种对TBL的积极体验伴随着他们成功的学业表现。鉴于这一代研究生的特点和学习偏好,TBL可能是一种在其他地方也能得到积极接受并能带来成功学业表现和学习效果的教学方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32a4/3977364/fb8965d126f6/jeehp-11-01-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验