Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
VA SLC Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1136-1142. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16537.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to impact older adults disproportionately, from severe illness and hospitalization to increased mortality risk. Concurrently, concerns about potential shortages of healthcare professionals and health supplies to address these needs have focused attention on how resources are ultimately allocated and used. Some strategies misguidedly use age as an arbitrary criterion, inappropriately disfavoring older adults. This statement represents the official policy position of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS). It is intended to inform stakeholders including hospitals, health systems, and policymakers about ethical considerations to consider when developing strategies for allocating scarce resources during an emergency involving older adults. Members of the AGS Ethics Committee collaborated with interprofessional experts in ethics, law, nursing, and medicine (including geriatrics, palliative care, emergency medicine, and pulmonology/critical care) to conduct a structured literature review and examine relevant reports. The resulting recommendations defend a particular view of distributive justice that maximizes relevant clinical factors and deemphasizes or eliminates factors placing arbitrary, disproportionate weight on advanced age. The AGS positions include (1) avoiding age per se as a means for excluding anyone from care; (2) assessing comorbidities and considering the disparate impact of social determinants of health; (3) encouraging decision makers to focus primarily on potential short-term (not long-term) outcomes; (4) avoiding ancillary criteria such as "life-years saved" and "long-term predicted life expectancy" that might disadvantage older people; (5) forming and staffing triage committees tasked with allocating scarce resources; (6) developing institutional resource allocation strategies that are transparent and applied uniformly; and (7) facilitating appropriate advance care planning. The statement includes recommendations that should be immediately implemented to address resource allocation strategies during COVID-19, aligning with AGS positions. The statement also includes recommendations for post-pandemic review. Such review would support revised strategies to ensure that governments and institutions have equitable emergency resource allocation strategies, avoid future discriminatory language and practice, and have appropriate guidance to develop national frameworks for emergent resource allocation decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1136-1142, 2020.
新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)继续不成比例地对老年人造成严重影响,从严重疾病和住院到增加死亡风险。同时,对满足这些需求的医疗保健专业人员和卫生用品潜在短缺的担忧,使人们关注资源最终如何分配和使用。一些策略错误地将年龄作为任意标准,不恰当地对老年人不利。本声明代表美国老年医学会(AGS)的官方政策立场。其目的是告知医院、医疗系统和决策者等利益攸关方,在制定涉及老年人的紧急情况下分配稀缺资源的策略时,应考虑到伦理考虑因素。AGS 伦理委员会的成员与伦理、法律、护理和医学(包括老年病学、姑息治疗、急诊医学和肺病学/危重病学)方面的跨专业专家合作,进行了结构化文献回顾并审查了相关报告。由此产生的建议捍卫了一种特定的分配正义观点,即最大限度地利用相关临床因素,淡化或消除将任意、不成比例的权重放在高龄上的因素。AGS 的立场包括(1)避免将年龄本身作为排除任何人获得护理的手段;(2)评估合并症并考虑健康社会决定因素的不同影响;(3)鼓励决策者主要关注潜在的短期(而非长期)结果;(4)避免“挽救生命年”和“长期预测预期寿命”等辅助标准,这些标准可能对老年人不利;(5)组建和配备负责分配稀缺资源的分诊委员会;(6)制定透明和统一应用的机构资源分配策略;(7)促进适当的预先护理计划。该声明包含了在 COVID-19 期间应立即实施的资源分配策略建议,以符合 AGS 的立场。该声明还包含了大流行后审查的建议。这种审查将支持修订战略,以确保政府和机构具有公平的紧急资源分配战略,避免未来歧视性语言和做法,并为制定新兴资源分配决策的国家框架提供适当指导。J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1136-1142, 2020.