Department of Life Sciences & Medicine, GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Southwark High Support Rehabilitation, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;41(8):723-735. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1710005. Epub 2020 May 6.
The appropriate treatment of mentally unwell, aggressive patients has challenged psychiatry for centuries. Seclusion is practiced worldwide, but concerns remain regarding its appropriateness and lack of alternatives. Patients generally report seclusion as a negative experience, though there is a paucity of literature exploring this in detail. This investigation was a service evaluation appraising inpatients' perspective of processes occurring before (information, communication), during (review, care), and after (debrief, reflection) seclusion in a psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU). In this phenomenological study, qualitative data were gathered using a questionnaire in a structured interview. All patients had been nursed in seclusion during admission to a male PICU at South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Ten patients were interviewed over 4 months. The central theme was perceived lack of communication in the patient-professional relationship, which manifested itself as (i) violence against patients, (ii) lack of psychological support, and (iii) the need for alternatives. Such feedback from patients queries whether national guidelines are appropriate and/or being adhered to. Healthcare practitioners have a responsibility to challenge accepted practice to continually improve the standard of patient-centred care. Utilising patient perspectives can be a powerful driver of change towards more humane treatment of vulnerable patients.
精神不适、具有攻击性的患者的恰当治疗方法是精神病学几个世纪以来一直面临的挑战。 全世界都在实行隔离,但人们仍然对其适当性和缺乏替代方案表示担忧。 尽管有关详细探讨这方面的文献很少,但患者通常会将隔离视为一种负面体验。 这项调查是一项服务评估,评估了精神病重症监护病房 (PICU) 中患者在隔离前(信息、沟通)、隔离期间(审查、护理)和隔离后(汇报、反思)发生的过程的看法。 在这项现象学研究中,使用问卷在结构化访谈中收集了定性数据。 所有患者在南伦敦和莫兹利国民保健信托基金会的一家男性 PICU 住院期间都曾被隔离护理。 在 4 个月的时间里,对 10 名患者进行了采访。 核心主题是患者与专业人员之间缺乏沟通,表现为 (i) 对患者的暴力行为,(ii) 缺乏心理支持,以及 (iii) 需要替代方案。 这种来自患者的反馈质疑国家指南是否合适和/或是否得到遵守。 医疗保健从业者有责任挑战既定做法,不断提高以患者为中心的护理标准。 利用患者的观点可以成为推动更人道地治疗弱势患者的有力动力。