Suppr超能文献

可接受性和使用一种患者持有的沟通工具,为生活与痴呆症的人:一项纵向定性研究。

Acceptability and use of a patient-held communication tool for people living with dementia: a longitudinal qualitative study.

机构信息

Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK

Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Ulster University, Coleraine Campus, Coleraine, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e036249. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036249.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the acceptability and use of a low-cost patient-held communication tool.

DESIGN

Longitudinal qualitative interviews at three time points over 18 months and document content analysis.

SETTING

Primary and community services.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-eight dyads: People living with dementia in Northern Ireland and their informal carers.

INTERVENTIONS

A patient-held healthcare 'passport' for people living with dementia.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Acceptability and use of the passport-barriers and facilitators to successful engagement.

RESULTS

There was a qualified appreciation of the healthcare passport and a much more nuanced, individualistic or personalised approach to its desirability and use. How people perceive it and what they actually do with it are strongly determined by individual contexts, dementia stage and other health problems, social and family needs and capacities. We noted concerns about privacy and ambivalence about engaging with health professionals.

CONCLUSION

Such tools may be of use but there is a need for demanding, thoughtful and nuanced programme delivery for future implementation in dementia care. The incentivisation and commitment of general practitioners is crucial. Altering the asymmetrical relationship between professionals and patients requires more extensive attention.

摘要

目的

评估一种低成本的患者持有的沟通工具的可接受性和使用情况。

设计

18 个月内三个时间点的纵向定性访谈和文献内容分析。

地点

初级和社区服务。

参与者

28 对患者-照护者:北爱尔兰的痴呆症患者及其非正规照护者。

干预措施

为痴呆症患者提供的患者持有的医疗保健“护照”。

主要和次要结果

对护照的可接受性和使用情况-成功参与的障碍和促进因素。

结果

人们对医疗保健护照有一定的认识,但对其可取性和使用方式有更细致、个性化或个人化的看法。人们如何看待它以及他们实际如何使用它,强烈取决于个人背景、痴呆症阶段和其他健康问题、社会和家庭需求和能力。我们注意到对隐私的担忧以及对与卫生专业人员接触的矛盾心理。

结论

这种工具可能有用,但在痴呆症护理的未来实施中,需要有要求高、深思熟虑和细致入微的方案交付。全科医生的激励和承诺至关重要。改变专业人员和患者之间的不对称关系需要更广泛的关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2d8/7223142/aad76ae216c6/bmjopen-2019-036249f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验