• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陆地植物的线粒体系统发育显示,在成分异质替代模型下,支持角苔纲。

The mitochondrial phylogeny of land plants shows support for Setaphyta under composition-heterogeneous substitution models.

作者信息

Sousa Filipe, Civáň Peter, Brazão João, Foster Peter G, Cox Cymon J

机构信息

Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal.

INRAE-Université Clermont-Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2020 Apr 28;8:e8995. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8995. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.8995
PMID:32377448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7194085/
Abstract

Congruence among analyses of plant genomic data partitions (nuclear, chloroplast and mitochondrial) is a strong indicator of accuracy in plant molecular phylogenetics. Recent analyses of both nuclear and chloroplast genome data of land plants (embryophytes) have, controversially, been shown to support monophyly of both bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, and hornworts) and tracheophytes (lycopods, ferns, and seed plants), with mosses and liverworts forming the clade Setaphyta. However, relationships inferred from mitochondria are incongruent with these results, and typically indicate paraphyly of bryophytes with liverworts alone resolved as the earliest-branching land plant group. Here, we reconstruct the mitochondrial land plant phylogeny from a newly compiled data set. When among-lineage composition heterogeneity is accounted for in analyses of codon-degenerate nucleotide and amino acid data, the clade Setaphyta is recovered with high support, and hornworts are supported as the earliest-branching lineage of land plants. These new mitochondrial analyses demonstrate partial congruence with current hypotheses based on nuclear and chloroplast genome data, and provide further incentive for revision of how plants arose on land.

摘要

植物基因组数据分区(核基因组、叶绿体基因组和线粒体基因组)分析结果之间的一致性是植物分子系统发育准确性的有力指标。最近对陆地植物(有胚植物)的核基因组和叶绿体基因组数据的分析结果颇具争议,这些分析表明苔藓植物(苔藓、地钱和角苔)和维管植物(石松、蕨类植物和种子植物)均为单系类群,其中苔藓和地钱构成了Setaphyta分支。然而,从线粒体基因组推断出的关系与这些结果不一致,通常表明苔藓植物是并系类群,仅地钱被解析为最早分支的陆地植物类群。在此,我们根据新汇编的数据集重建了陆地植物线粒体基因组系统发育。当在密码子简并核苷酸和氨基酸数据分析中考虑谱系组成异质性时,Setaphyta分支获得了高度支持,并且角苔被支持为陆地植物最早分支的谱系。这些新的线粒体基因组分析表明,与基于核基因组和叶绿体基因组数据的当前假说部分一致,并为修订植物在陆地上的起源方式提供了进一步的动力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/7194085/130f2498fc30/peerj-08-8995-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/7194085/b85bf5ca0e82/peerj-08-8995-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/7194085/130f2498fc30/peerj-08-8995-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/7194085/b85bf5ca0e82/peerj-08-8995-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/7194085/130f2498fc30/peerj-08-8995-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The mitochondrial phylogeny of land plants shows support for Setaphyta under composition-heterogeneous substitution models.陆地植物的线粒体系统发育显示,在成分异质替代模型下,支持角苔纲。
PeerJ. 2020 Apr 28;8:e8995. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8995. eCollection 2020.
2
Mitochondrial phylogenomics of early land plants: mitigating the effects of saturation, compositional heterogeneity, and codon-usage bias.早期陆地植物的线粒体系统发育基因组学:减轻饱和度、组成异质性和密码子使用偏好的影响。
Syst Biol. 2014 Nov;63(6):862-78. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu049. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
3
Nuclear protein phylogenies support the monophyly of the three bryophyte groups (Bryophyta Schimp.).核蛋白系统发育支持三个苔藓植物群(Bryophyta Schimp.)的单系性。
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):565-575. doi: 10.1111/nph.15587. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
4
The Interrelationships of Land Plants and the Nature of the Ancestral Embryophyte.陆地植物的相互关系和祖生植物的本质。
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):733-745.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny.早期陆地植物的营养和繁殖创新:对统一系统发育的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Jun 29;355(1398):769-93. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0615.
6
The Chloroplast Land Plant Phylogeny: Analyses Employing Better-Fitting Tree- and Site-Heterogeneous Composition Models.叶绿体陆地植物系统发育:采用更合适的树形和位点异质性组成模型的分析
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 10;11:1062. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01062. eCollection 2020.
7
Multigene phylogeny of land plants with special reference to bryophytes and the earliest land plants.陆地植物的多基因系统发育,特别涉及苔藓植物和最早的陆地植物。
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Dec;17(12):1885-95. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026290.
8
Diversity, phylogeny, and adaptation of bryophytes: insights from genomic and transcriptomic data.苔藓植物的多样性、系统发育与适应性:来自基因组和转录组数据的见解
J Exp Bot. 2022 Jul 16;73(13):4306-4322. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac127.
9
Exclusive conservation of mitochondrial group II intron nad4i548 among liverworts and its use for phylogenetic studies in this ancient plant clade.线粒体组 II 内含子 nad4i548 在苔藓植物中的独特保守性及其在该古老植物类群系统发育研究中的应用。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2012 Mar;14(2):382-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00499.x. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
10
Phylogenetic relationships of land plants using mitochondrial small-subunit rDNA sequences.利用线粒体小亚基rDNA序列研究陆地植物的系统发育关系。
Am J Bot. 1999 Mar;86(3):372-86.

引用本文的文献

1
Phylogenomics of angiosperms based on mitochondrial genes: insights into deep node relationships.基于线粒体基因的被子植物系统发育基因组学:对深层节点关系的见解。
BMC Biol. 2025 Feb 14;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02135-9.
2
From barcodes to genomes: a new era of molecular exploration in bryophyte research.从条形码到基因组:苔藓植物研究中分子探索的新时代。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 13;15:1500607. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1500607. eCollection 2024.
3
Target capture and genome skimming for plant diversity studies.用于植物多样性研究的目标捕获和基因组浅层测序

本文引用的文献

1
Organellomic data sets confirm a cryptic consensus on (unrooted) land-plant relationships and provide new insights into bryophyte molecular evolution.细胞器组数据集证实了(无根)陆地植物关系的隐含共识,并为苔藓植物分子进化提供了新的见解。
Am J Bot. 2020 Jan;107(1):91-115. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1397. Epub 2019 Dec 8.
2
One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants.一万种植物转录组与绿色植物的系统发生基因组学
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7780):679-685. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1693-2. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
3
Nuclear protein phylogenies support the monophyly of the three bryophyte groups (Bryophyta Schimp.).
Appl Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 10;11(4):e11537. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11537. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
4
Characterizing conflict and congruence of molecular evolution across organellar genome sequences for phylogenetics in land plants.表征陆地植物系统发育中跨细胞器基因组序列的分子进化冲突与一致性
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 30;14:1125107. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1125107. eCollection 2023.
5
An empirical analysis of mtSSRs: could microsatellite distribution patterns explain the evolution of mitogenomes in plants?mtSSRs 的实证分析:微卫星分布模式能否解释植物线粒体基因组的进化?
Funct Integr Genomics. 2022 Feb;22(1):35-53. doi: 10.1007/s10142-021-00815-7. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
6
The Chloroplast Land Plant Phylogeny: Analyses Employing Better-Fitting Tree- and Site-Heterogeneous Composition Models.叶绿体陆地植物系统发育:采用更合适的树形和位点异质性组成模型的分析
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 10;11:1062. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01062. eCollection 2020.
核蛋白系统发育支持三个苔藓植物群(Bryophyta Schimp.)的单系性。
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):565-575. doi: 10.1111/nph.15587. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
4
The timescale of early land plant evolution.早期陆地植物进化的时间尺度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):E2274-E2283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719588115. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
5
The Interrelationships of Land Plants and the Nature of the Ancestral Embryophyte.陆地植物的相互关系和祖生植物的本质。
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):733-745.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Genome-wide interrogation advances resolution of recalcitrant groups in the tree of life.全基因组分析提升了生命之树中顽固类群的解析度。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Jan 13;1(2):20. doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0020.
7
Implementing and testing the multispecies coalescent model: A valuable paradigm for phylogenomics.实施和测试多物种合并模型:系统发育基因组学的一个有价值的范例。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Jan;94(Pt A):447-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.027. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
The gene tree delusion.基因树错觉
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Jan;94(Pt A):1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
9
Concatenation and Species Tree Methods Exhibit Statistically Indistinguishable Accuracy under a Range of Simulated Conditions.在一系列模拟条件下,串联法和物种树方法的准确性在统计学上无显著差异。
PLoS Curr. 2015 Mar 9;7:ecurrents.tol.34260cc27551a527b124ec5f6334b6be. doi: 10.1371/currents.tol.34260cc27551a527b124ec5f6334b6be.
10
Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants.陆地植物起源与早期多样化的系统发育转录组学分析
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):E4859-68. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323926111. Epub 2014 Oct 29.