• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

叶绿体陆地植物系统发育:采用更合适的树形和位点异质性组成模型的分析

The Chloroplast Land Plant Phylogeny: Analyses Employing Better-Fitting Tree- and Site-Heterogeneous Composition Models.

作者信息

Sousa Filipe, Civáň Peter, Foster Peter G, Cox Cymon J

机构信息

Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal.

INRA, Université Clermont-Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 10;11:1062. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01062. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2020.01062
PMID:32760416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7373204/
Abstract

The colonization of land by descendants of charophyte green algae marked a turning point in Earth history that enabled the development of the diverse terrestrial ecosystems we see today. Early land plants diversified into three gametophyte-dominant lineages, namely the hornworts, liverworts, and mosses, collectively known as bryophytes, and a sporophyte-dominant lineage, the vascular plants, or tracheophytes. In recent decades, the prevailing view of evolutionary relationships among these four lineages has been that the tracheophytes were derived from a bryophyte ancestor. However, recent phylogenetic evidence has suggested that bryophytes are monophyletic, and thus that the first split among land plants gave rise to the lineages that today we recognize as the bryophytes and tracheophytes. We present a phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast protein-coding data that also supports the monophyly of bryophytes. This newly compiled data set consists of 83 chloroplast genes sampled across 30 taxa that include chlorophytes and charophytes, including four members of the Zygnematophyceae, and land plants, that were sampled following a balanced representation of the main bryophyte and tracheophyte lineages. Analyses of non-synonymous site nucleotide data and amino acid translation data result in congruent phylogenetic trees showing the monophyly of bryophytes, with the Zygnematophyceae as the charophyte group most closely related to land plants. Analyses showing that bryophytes and tracheophytes evolved separately from a common terrestrial ancestor have profound implications for the way we understand the evolution of plant life cycles on land and how we interpret the early land plant fossil record.

摘要

轮藻绿藻的后代在陆地上的定殖标志着地球历史上的一个转折点,使得我们如今所见的多样陆地生态系统得以发展。早期陆地植物分化为三个以配子体为主的谱系,即角苔、叶苔和藓类,统称为苔藓植物,以及一个以孢子体为主的谱系,即维管植物或导管植物。近几十年来,关于这四个谱系之间进化关系的主流观点一直是维管植物起源于苔藓植物祖先。然而,最近的系统发育证据表明苔藓植物是单系的,因此陆地植物的首次分化产生了我们如今所认识的苔藓植物和维管植物谱系。我们展示了一项对叶绿体蛋白质编码数据的系统发育分析,该分析也支持苔藓植物的单系性。这个新汇编的数据集由跨越30个分类群的83个叶绿体基因组成,这些分类群包括绿藻和轮藻,其中包括双星藻科的四个成员,以及陆地植物,这些陆地植物是在主要苔藓植物和维管植物谱系得到平衡代表的情况下进行采样的。对非同义位点核苷酸数据和氨基酸翻译数据的分析得出了一致的系统发育树,显示了苔藓植物的单系性,其中双星藻科是与陆地植物关系最密切的轮藻类群。分析表明苔藓植物和维管植物从一个共同的陆地祖先分别进化,这对我们理解陆地植物生命周期的进化方式以及我们如何解读早期陆地植物化石记录有着深远的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/b90a9385e640/fpls-11-01062-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/0802996ef863/fpls-11-01062-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/8a0103600f89/fpls-11-01062-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/82dc7e8b60e7/fpls-11-01062-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/b90a9385e640/fpls-11-01062-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/0802996ef863/fpls-11-01062-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/8a0103600f89/fpls-11-01062-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/82dc7e8b60e7/fpls-11-01062-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecbf/7373204/b90a9385e640/fpls-11-01062-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Chloroplast Land Plant Phylogeny: Analyses Employing Better-Fitting Tree- and Site-Heterogeneous Composition Models.叶绿体陆地植物系统发育:采用更合适的树形和位点异质性组成模型的分析
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 10;11:1062. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01062. eCollection 2020.
2
Mitochondrial phylogenomics of early land plants: mitigating the effects of saturation, compositional heterogeneity, and codon-usage bias.早期陆地植物的线粒体系统发育基因组学:减轻饱和度、组成异质性和密码子使用偏好的影响。
Syst Biol. 2014 Nov;63(6):862-78. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu049. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
3
Nuclear protein phylogenies support the monophyly of the three bryophyte groups (Bryophyta Schimp.).核蛋白系统发育支持三个苔藓植物群(Bryophyta Schimp.)的单系性。
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):565-575. doi: 10.1111/nph.15587. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
4
TRANSITION TO A LAND FLORA: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE GREEN ALGAE AND BRYOPHYTES.向陆地植物群的转变:绿藻和苔藓植物的系统发育关系。
Cladistics. 1985 Sep;1(4):305-328. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00431.x.
5
The Interrelationships of Land Plants and the Nature of the Ancestral Embryophyte.陆地植物的相互关系和祖生植物的本质。
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):733-745.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Major transitions in the evolution of early land plants: a bryological perspective.早期陆地植物进化中的主要转折:苔藓植物学视角。
Ann Bot. 2012 Apr;109(5):851-71. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs017. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
7
The mitochondrial phylogeny of land plants shows support for Setaphyta under composition-heterogeneous substitution models.陆地植物的线粒体系统发育显示,在成分异质替代模型下,支持角苔纲。
PeerJ. 2020 Apr 28;8:e8995. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8995. eCollection 2020.
8
Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny.早期陆地植物的营养和繁殖创新:对统一系统发育的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Jun 29;355(1398):769-93. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0615.
9
Organellomic data sets confirm a cryptic consensus on (unrooted) land-plant relationships and provide new insights into bryophyte molecular evolution.细胞器组数据集证实了(无根)陆地植物关系的隐含共识,并为苔藓植物分子进化提供了新的见解。
Am J Bot. 2020 Jan;107(1):91-115. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1397. Epub 2019 Dec 8.
10
Chloroplast phylogeny indicates that bryophytes are monophyletic.叶绿体系统发育研究表明苔藓植物是单系的。
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Oct;21(10):1813-9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh203. Epub 2004 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative chloroplast genomes of species: genome evolution and phylogenomic implications.物种的比较叶绿体基因组:基因组进化及系统发育学意义
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Apr 30;15:1349358. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1349358. eCollection 2024.
2
Lost in the bloom: DNA-PKcs in green plants.在繁花中迷失:绿色植物中的DNA依赖蛋白激酶催化亚基(DNA-PKcs)
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jul 28;14:1231678. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1231678. eCollection 2023.
3
Recent origin and diversification accompanied by repeated host shifts of thallus-mining flies (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on liverworts and hornworts.

本文引用的文献

1
The mitochondrial phylogeny of land plants shows support for Setaphyta under composition-heterogeneous substitution models.陆地植物的线粒体系统发育显示,在成分异质替代模型下,支持角苔纲。
PeerJ. 2020 Apr 28;8:e8995. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8995. eCollection 2020.
2
Phylogenomic Evidence for the Monophyly of Bryophytes and the Reductive Evolution of Stomata.系统基因组学证据支持苔藓植物的单系性和气孔的简化进化。
Curr Biol. 2020 Jun 8;30(11):2001-2012.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.048. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
3
One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants.
藻蝇(双翅目:Agromyzidae)在叶附生植物和角苔上的新近起源和多样化以及反复的宿主转移。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jun 14;290(2000):20222347. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2347. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
4
Characterizing conflict and congruence of molecular evolution across organellar genome sequences for phylogenetics in land plants.表征陆地植物系统发育中跨细胞器基因组序列的分子进化冲突与一致性
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 30;14:1125107. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1125107. eCollection 2023.
5
Divergent evolutionary trajectories of bryophytes and tracheophytes from a complex common ancestor of land plants.陆地植物复杂共同祖先中的苔藓植物和维管植物的分歧进化轨迹。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Nov;6(11):1634-1643. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01885-x. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
How was apical growth regulated in the ancestral land plant? Insights from the development of non-seed plants.在祖先的陆地植物中,顶端生长是如何被调控的?非种子植物发育的启示。
Plant Physiol. 2022 Aug 29;190(1):100-112. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac313.
7
Comparative Analyses of 3,654 Plastid Genomes Unravel Insights Into Evolutionary Dynamics and Phylogenetic Discordance of Green Plants.对3654个质体基因组的比较分析揭示了绿色植物进化动态和系统发育不一致性的见解。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 11;13:808156. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.808156. eCollection 2022.
8
The complete plastid genome sequence of the enigmatic moss, Takakia lepidozioides (Takakiopsida, Bryophyta): evolutionary perspectives on the largest collection of genes in mosses and the intensive RNA editing.神秘藓类 Takakia lepidozioides(Takakiopsida,苔藓植物)完整质体基因组序列:对藓类植物中最大基因集的进化观点和密集的 RNA 编辑。
Plant Mol Biol. 2021 Nov;107(4-5):431-449. doi: 10.1007/s11103-021-01214-z. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
一万种植物转录组与绿色植物的系统发生基因组学
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7780):679-685. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1693-2. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Nuclear protein phylogenies support the monophyly of the three bryophyte groups (Bryophyta Schimp.).核蛋白系统发育支持三个苔藓植物群(Bryophyta Schimp.)的单系性。
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):565-575. doi: 10.1111/nph.15587. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
5
Plastid phylogenomic analysis of green plants: A billion years of evolutionary history.绿色植物质体基因组分析:十亿年的进化历史。
Am J Bot. 2018 Mar;105(3):291-301. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1048. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
The timescale of early land plant evolution.早期陆地植物进化的时间尺度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):E2274-E2283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719588115. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
7
The Interrelationships of Land Plants and the Nature of the Ancestral Embryophyte.陆地植物的相互关系和祖生植物的本质。
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):733-745.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
How land plant life cycles first evolved.陆地植物的生命周期最初是如何演化的。
Science. 2017 Dec 22;358(6370):1538-1539. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2923.
9
Identifying Optimal Models of Evolution.识别最优进化模型。
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1525:379-420. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6622-6_15.
10
Comparative Chloroplast Genome Analyses of Streptophyte Green Algae Uncover Major Structural Alterations in the Klebsormidiophyceae, Coleochaetophyceae and Zygnematophyceae.链形植物绿藻的叶绿体基因组比较分析揭示了 Klebsormidiophyceae、鞘毛藻科和双星藻科中的主要结构变化。
Front Plant Sci. 2016 May 24;7:697. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00697. eCollection 2016.