Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
UMCU; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):409-416. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05502-0. Epub 2020 May 6.
Insight into the causes of colorectal cancer (CRC) in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients is limited. Without definitive information, patients often shape their own beliefs on the cause of their illness, developing causal attributions. This study aims to examine the causal attributions of CRC in AYA patients, compare these with middle-aged and older adults CRC patient groups and explore the association between causal attributions and psychological distress.
Two cross-sectional questionnaire studies were conducted among CRC survivors diagnosed between 1998 and 2007 using the population-based PROFILES registry. Three groups were defined by age at diagnosis: AYA (18-39 years; n = 67), middle-aged (40-70 years; n = 1993) and older adult survivors (70+ years; n = 1922). Causal attributions were assessed in a single free-text item from the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
AYA survivors most often attributed their CRC to heredity (36.4%), lifestyle (14.5%) and chance (10.9%). AYA survivors attributed their CRC to these causes more frequently than middle-aged and older adult CRC survivors. AYA survivors who attributed their CRC to causes out of their control (chance, heredity) showed significantly lower mean scores on anxiety (4.3 vs. 5.6; p < 0.01) compared to AYAs who reported causes within their control (lifestyle, stress). No significant difference was found for depression.
AYA patients with CRC may benefit from in-depth discussion about the lack of known (biological) causes and how this does not directly imply a lifestyle or stress cause.
青少年和年轻成人(AYA)患者结直肠癌(CRC)病因的了解有限。由于缺乏明确信息,患者通常会根据自己的疾病原因形成自己的信念,从而产生因果归因。本研究旨在检查 AYA 患者 CRC 的因果归因,将其与中老年 CRC 患者组进行比较,并探讨因果归因与心理困扰之间的关系。
本研究使用基于人群的 PROFILES 登记处,对 1998 年至 2007 年间诊断为 CRC 的幸存者进行了两项横断面问卷调查研究。根据诊断时的年龄将患者分为三组:AYA(18-39 岁;n=67)、中年(40-70 岁;n=1993)和老年幸存者(70+岁;n=1922)。因果归因通过 Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire 中的单个自由文本项进行评估,心理困扰通过医院焦虑和抑郁量表进行测量。
AYA 幸存者最常将 CRC 归因于遗传(36.4%)、生活方式(14.5%)和偶然(10.9%)。与中老年 CRC 幸存者相比,AYA 幸存者更常将 CRC 归因于这些原因。将 CRC 归因于无法控制的原因(偶然、遗传)的 AYA 幸存者,其焦虑评分明显低于将 CRC 归因于可控制的原因(生活方式、压力)的 AYA 幸存者(4.3 与 5.6;p<0.01)。对于抑郁,未发现显著差异。
CRC 的 AYA 患者可能受益于深入讨论缺乏已知(生物学)原因,以及这并不直接暗示生活方式或压力原因。